chore: sync 8 org-standard workflow stub(s) from petry-projects/.github - #436
Conversation
don-petry
added
the
standards-sync
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (applied)Changes committed and pushed. |
|
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
Advisory bots were rate-limited; auto-approval is withheld until they recover. pr-review-sweep will re-review this PR after 2026-07-13T12:46:29Z. |
donpetry-bot
left a comment
donpetry-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Automated review — APPROVED ✓
Risk: MEDIUM
Reviewed commit: 341b9c887204285265d45e5502c340d3505fe8d4
Review mode: triage-approved (single reviewer)
Summary
Standards-sync PR deploying 8 org-standard workflow stubs verbatim from petry-projects/.github. Changes are channel-tag pin bumps (stable → v1-stable/v2-stable), comment/whitespace normalization, and removal of the discussion trigger from add-to-project.yml (reduced trigger surface). All 11 files were verified against the source-of-truth files in petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/ — the only deltas are whitespace and the per-repo channel pins, which the stub headers explicitly permit. All referenced channel tags were confirmed to exist. No permission or secrets changes; all reusable refs are first-party.
Linked issue analysis
No linked issues. This PR was opened automatically by scripts/deploy-standard-workflows.sh as part of the org standards-sync pipeline (labeled standards-sync); the PR body documents the sync scope. No issue linkage is expected for this class of PR.
Findings
- Triage assessment confirmed: thin caller stubs only; all behaviour lives in the reusables.
- Verified verbatim sync: each stub matches petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/ modulo whitespace and the documented per-repo channel pin (e.g. dev-lead/v1-stable, agent-shield/v2-stable). All pinned tags exist in petry-projects/.github and petry-projects/.github-private.
- No new permissions, triggers, or secret exposure. add-to-project.yml drops the discussion trigger, reducing surface. secrets: inherit usage is pre-existing and unchanged.
- Secret scan: run_secret_scanning MCP tool unavailable in this run; gitleaks CI check passed. No secrets present in the diff (workflow refs and comments only).
- No unresolved review threads or human reviewer questions; all PR comments are bot advisories (CodeRabbit/Codex rate limits, SonarCloud pass, dev-lead status markers).
CI status
All required checks green at 341b9c8: CI Pipeline (build-and-test, gitleaks, autofix), CodeQL (actions/js-ts/python), SonarCloud quality gate passed (0 new issues, 0 hotspots), Node.js Tests, Playwright UI Tests, Coverage, AgentShield, dependency-audit (npm audit pass; other ecosystems skipped), CodeRabbit status SUCCESS. Skipped jobs are conditional (dependabot-only / ecosystem-absent) and expected.
Reviewed automatically by the PR-review agent (single-reviewer mode: fable 5). Reply if you need a human review.
2 participants
Syncs the following org-standard workflow stub(s) from
petry-projects/.github(standards/workflows/), deployed verbatim:pr-review-mention.ymldev-lead.ymlagent-shield.ymlauto-rebase.ymldependabot-automerge.ymldependabot-rebase.ymldependency-audit.ymladd-to-project.ymlOpened by
scripts/deploy-standard-workflows.sh. Stubs are thin callers; all behaviour lives in the reusables. Seestandards/ci-standards.md. Labeledstandards-syncand left for the normal review/auto-merge pipeline — the deploy script never merges directly.