You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Found while doing the page-scoped citation verification for the #4984 header campaign
(wave 9, LGC Two*/Base*/Site*, PR #5006). One site of this class was inside that
wave's frozen 37-file set and is repaired there; every site listed below is outside
it and is filed here rather than absorbed, following the #4987 / #4989 / #4991 / #4993 / #4998 / #5005 precedent.
Verification method: page-scoped extraction (pdftotext -f N -l N on .self-local/refs/Glimm.Jaffe.P428.*.pdf), never the flat OCR text. In the chapter-4
region book page = PDF page − 16 (PDF 72 = book 56, PDF 73 = 57, PDF 74 = 58,
PDF 75 = 59). Anyone re-checking must re-measure the offset in the region they read.
Revision (PR #5006 round 2). Three corrections to this issue's own prose, from an
independent re-extraction: the GKS-I attribution below was wrong (it is Theorem 4.1.1,
not equation (4.1.10)); the site inventory was incomplete (docs/index.md:398 and docs/index.md:1438 were missing); and the "correct at five sites" count understated
the correct uses by more than half. The six defect sites and the disposition are
unchanged.
What Glimm-Jaffe §4.1-§4.2 actually contains
Theorem 4.1.1, book p. 57 (PDF 73): "Let H be ferromagnetic, let dμ_i(ξ_i) be
symmetric under ξ_i → -ξ_i, and let (4.1.4) be satisfied. Then all moments are
nonnegative: 0 ≤ ⟨ξ^A⟩ (4.1.9)." This is GKS-I.
Lemma 4.1.2, book p. 57: 2^{|A|/2}(ξ^A ± χ^A) = (q + t)^A ± (q - t)^A is
ferromagnetic in the duplicate variables q, t.
Theorem 4.1.3, book p. 57 (PDF 73): "With the same assumption as the previous
theorem, 0 ≤ ⟨q^A t^B⟩ (4.1.10), 0 ≤ ⟨ξ^A ξ^B⟩ − ⟨ξ^A⟩⟨ξ^B⟩ (4.1.11)." (4.1.11) is GKS-II; (4.1.10) is the duplicate-variable inequality in q, t that
Glimm-Jaffe prove first and then use to derive (4.1.11) — it is not a second statement
of GKS-I. For Ising spins σ² = 1, so σ^A σ^B = σ^{A∆B} and (4.1.11) is exactly the
repository's symmetric-difference form.
Proposition 4.2.1, book p. 58 (PDF 74): correlations are monotone increasing in
the couplings J_A.
Proposition 4.2.2, book p. 58: Ising couplings are ferromagnetic, correlations
are at most 1.
Theorem 4.2.3, book p. 59 (PDF 75): "Let 0 ≤ h in (4.2.2). As Λ ↑ ℝ^d, the
correlation functions (4.2.1) of the Ising model converge." This is a convergence
theorem. It is not an inequality and it is not about J-monotonicity.
Theorem 4.2.3 is convergence, not the second Griffiths inequality. The correct source is
Theorem 4.1.3, (4.1.11), p. 57.
IsingModel/AmbientLattice/CorrelationInfinite/GKSSecondPrelude.lean:24 — module header,
"Reference: Glimm-Jaffe, Quantum Physics §4.2 Theorem 4.2.3 (GKS-II for the
infinite-volume limit)". The Friedli-Velenik Thm 3.49 pointer on the next line is not
checked here.
docs/index.md:382 — table row "GKS-II at ∞-vol (Thm 4.2.3)".
docs/index.md:1147 — "GKS-II at infinite volume (Glimm-Jaffe §4.2 Thm 4.2.3)".
docs/index.md:1284 — the §4.2 progress row lists correlationInfinite_gks_second
(GKS-II) under "Thm 4.2.3 (thermodynamic limit)". Here the row label is right and the
membership is the defect: exhaustion-independence belongs under 4.2.3, GKS-II does not.
Repaired in PR #5006 (in the frozen set, so not left to this issue): IsingModel/Concrete/LatticeGraphCorrelation/TwoPointCorrelationInfinite.lean, whose
GKS-II docstring now cites "§4.1 Thm 4.1.3, p. 57, in its Ising symmetric-difference
form".
B. "Proposition 4.2.3" for J-monotonicity
There is no Proposition 4.2.3; 4.2.3 is a Theorem and is about convergence. The correct
source for J-monotonicity is Proposition 4.2.1, p. 58.
grep -rn '4\.2\.3' over IsingModel/, docs/index.md and README.md returns 20
lines: 6 defects (above), 2 under-qualified analogies, 12 correct uses. The
count matters because it is what forbids a blanket replacement.
The two under-qualified analogies. FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicityConvergent.lean:24 ("GJ §4.2 Thm 4.2.3 (J → ∞ along
ℕ)") and docs/index.md:1438 ("the direct GJ §4.2 Thm 4.2.3 specialization (J → ∞ along
ℕ)") both transpose the theorem from the volume direction (Λ ↑ ℝ^d) into a parameter
direction at fixed Λ. That transposition is real mathematics in this repository and the
theorem number is the right pointer for it, but neither line says it is a transposition,
whereas line 14 of the same file does ("taken here in a parameter direction at fixed Λ
rather than in the volume direction"). They are listed as a register weakness, not as
defects. docs/index.md:1438 additionally says "Prop 4.2.4 companion", which is #4993's
subject and is not re-derived here.
The correct uses.InfiniteVolume/Lattice.lean and InfiniteVolume/MonotoneJ.lean
cite Theorem 4.2.3, p. 59, for convergence statements — right on content and page. docs/index.md:398 is the section heading "### §4.2: Thermodynamic limit of correlations
(Thm 4.2.3)" — right on content. TwoPointCorrelationInfinite.lean:12,39 attribute
exhaustion-independence to 4.2.3 as a corollary of the convergence theorem — right.
Suggested disposition
Site by site, not by blanket search-and-replace. Of the 20 lines carrying the string 4.2.3, 12 are correct and 2 more are correct-but-under-qualified, so a sweep would
break 14 lines to fix 6. #4993's own note about this failure mode applies here too. The
mathematics is fine everywhere; only the labels are wrong.
Not derived here and must not be assumed. Two of the .lean sites
(GKSSecondPrelude.lean, PosAndAntitone.lean) are in the Lean lane and may or may not
carry a ratchet charge in a later wave's frozen set; the four docs/index.md sites are in
the docs lane, which #4984 explicitly does not cover.
Found while doing the page-scoped citation verification for the #4984 header campaign
(wave 9, LGC
Two*/Base*/Site*, PR #5006). One site of this class was inside thatwave's frozen 37-file set and is repaired there; every site listed below is outside
it and is filed here rather than absorbed, following the #4987 / #4989 / #4991 / #4993 /
#4998 / #5005 precedent.
Verification method: page-scoped extraction (
pdftotext -f N -l Non.self-local/refs/Glimm.Jaffe.P428.*.pdf), never the flat OCR text. In the chapter-4region book page = PDF page − 16 (PDF 72 = book 56, PDF 73 = 57, PDF 74 = 58,
PDF 75 = 59). Anyone re-checking must re-measure the offset in the region they read.
What Glimm-Jaffe §4.1-§4.2 actually contains
dμ_i(ξ_i)besymmetric under
ξ_i → -ξ_i, and let (4.1.4) be satisfied. Then all moments arenonnegative:
0 ≤ ⟨ξ^A⟩(4.1.9)." This is GKS-I.2^{|A|/2}(ξ^A ± χ^A) = (q + t)^A ± (q - t)^Aisferromagnetic in the duplicate variables
q, t.theorem,
0 ≤ ⟨q^A t^B⟩(4.1.10),0 ≤ ⟨ξ^A ξ^B⟩ − ⟨ξ^A⟩⟨ξ^B⟩(4.1.11)."(4.1.11) is GKS-II; (4.1.10) is the duplicate-variable inequality in
q, tthatGlimm-Jaffe prove first and then use to derive (4.1.11) — it is not a second statement
of GKS-I. For Ising spins
σ² = 1, soσ^A σ^B = σ^{A∆B}and (4.1.11) is exactly therepository's symmetric-difference form.
the couplings
J_A.are at most 1.
0 ≤ hin (4.2.2). AsΛ ↑ ℝ^d, thecorrelation functions (4.2.1) of the Ising model converge." This is a convergence
theorem. It is not an inequality and it is not about J-monotonicity.
no Proposition 4.2.4 (the latter is Errata: Glimm-Jaffe Proposition 4.2.4 does not exist, and Corollary 4.3.5's page is 63 not 62 #4993's subject).
A. GKS-II attributed to Theorem 4.2.3
Theorem 4.2.3 is convergence, not the second Griffiths inequality. The correct source is
Theorem 4.1.3, (4.1.11), p. 57.
IsingModel/AmbientLattice/CorrelationInfinite/GKSSecondPrelude.lean:24— module header,"Reference: Glimm-Jaffe, Quantum Physics §4.2 Theorem 4.2.3 (GKS-II for the
infinite-volume limit)". The Friedli-Velenik Thm 3.49 pointer on the next line is not
checked here.
docs/index.md:382— table row "GKS-II at ∞-vol (Thm 4.2.3)".docs/index.md:1147— "GKS-II at infinite volume (Glimm-Jaffe §4.2 Thm 4.2.3)".docs/index.md:1284— the §4.2 progress row listscorrelationInfinite_gks_second(GKS-II) under "Thm 4.2.3 (thermodynamic limit)". Here the row label is right and the
membership is the defect: exhaustion-independence belongs under 4.2.3, GKS-II does not.
Repaired in PR #5006 (in the frozen set, so not left to this issue):
IsingModel/Concrete/LatticeGraphCorrelation/TwoPointCorrelationInfinite.lean, whoseGKS-II docstring now cites "§4.1 Thm 4.1.3, p. 57, in its Ising symmetric-difference
form".
B. "Proposition 4.2.3" for J-monotonicity
There is no Proposition 4.2.3; 4.2.3 is a Theorem and is about convergence. The correct
source for J-monotonicity is Proposition 4.2.1, p. 58.
IsingModel/Concrete/LatticeGraphCorrelation/LatticeMassHighTemperature/PosAndAntitone.lean:135— "(
correlationInfinite_monotone_J, GJ Prop 4.2.3)".IsingModel/Concrete/LatticeGraphCorrelation/LatticeMassHighTemperature/PosAndAntitone.lean:137— "Reference: Glimm-Jaffe §17.1 pp. 304-306; §4.2 Prop 4.2.3 (J-monotonicity)". The
§17.1 page range on that same line is Errata: 130 tracked lines cite Glimm-Jaffe §17.5 at pp. 304--306 (§17.5 is pp. 310--312; Lemma 17.5.2 is pp. 311--312), and no wave will reach them #4991's subject and is not re-derived here.
Full inventory of
4.2.3in the treegrep -rn '4\.2\.3'overIsingModel/,docs/index.mdandREADME.mdreturns 20lines: 6 defects (above), 2 under-qualified analogies, 12 correct uses. The
count matters because it is what forbids a blanket replacement.
AmbientLattice/CorrelationInfinite/GKSSecondPrelude.lean:24.../LatticeMassHighTemperature/PosAndAntitone.lean:135,137docs/index.md:382,1147,1284.../FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicityConvergent.lean:24docs/index.md:1438.../TwoPointCorrelationInfinite.lean:12,39.../FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicityConvergent.lean:14IsingModel/InfiniteVolume/Lattice.lean:15,21,28,75,129IsingModel/InfiniteVolume/MonotoneJ.lean:144,156,173docs/index.md:398The two under-qualified analogies.
FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicityConvergent.lean:24("GJ §4.2 Thm 4.2.3 (J → ∞ alongℕ)") and
docs/index.md:1438("the direct GJ §4.2 Thm 4.2.3 specialization (J → ∞ alongℕ)") both transpose the theorem from the volume direction (
Λ ↑ ℝ^d) into a parameterdirection at fixed
Λ. That transposition is real mathematics in this repository and thetheorem number is the right pointer for it, but neither line says it is a transposition,
whereas line 14 of the same file does ("taken here in a parameter direction at fixed
Λrather than in the volume direction"). They are listed as a register weakness, not as
defects.
docs/index.md:1438additionally says "Prop 4.2.4 companion", which is #4993'ssubject and is not re-derived here.
The correct uses.
InfiniteVolume/Lattice.leanandInfiniteVolume/MonotoneJ.leancite Theorem 4.2.3, p. 59, for convergence statements — right on content and page.
docs/index.md:398is the section heading "### §4.2: Thermodynamic limit of correlations(Thm 4.2.3)" — right on content.
TwoPointCorrelationInfinite.lean:12,39attributeexhaustion-independence to 4.2.3 as a corollary of the convergence theorem — right.
Suggested disposition
Site by site, not by blanket search-and-replace. Of the 20 lines carrying the string
4.2.3, 12 are correct and 2 more are correct-but-under-qualified, so a sweep wouldbreak 14 lines to fix 6. #4993's own note about this failure mode applies here too. The
mathematics is fine everywhere; only the labels are wrong.
Reachability by the #4984 campaign
Not derived here and must not be assumed. Two of the
.leansites(
GKSSecondPrelude.lean,PosAndAntitone.lean) are in the Lean lane and may or may notcarry a ratchet charge in a later wave's frozen set; the four
docs/index.mdsites are inthe docs lane, which #4984 explicitly does not cover.