docs(errata): #5032 PR-A — mechanical citation fixes (Aizenman/GJ/FFS pinpoints) - #5033
Merged
Conversation
… tree (#5032 item 1) Issue #5032 item 1: `Aizenman 1982 Lemma 4.1` does not exist. Re-extracted the primary paper (Commun. Math. Phys. 86, 1-48; `pdftotext -layout`, 49 pages, PDF page = book page) and confirmed first-hand: `Lemma 4.x` matches 0x, and section 4 ("A Heuristic Explanation of the Gaussian Structure ...", pp. 11-13) carries only eqs. (4.1) and (4.2) - so the sibling pointers `§4, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.10)`, `§4, Eqs. (4.8)-(4.10)` and `Eq. (4.12)` are equally nonexistent. Per-site classification (37 sites / 12 files; not a blanket rename), each site matched against what its own declaration claims: * Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5) - the switching lemma (source swap across the two-current doubled ensemble, conditioned on same-cluster connectivity), and the `weightSum * weightSum = tsum of fixed-M inner sums` regrouping that PR #5031 already anchored there. * Lemma 3.1, p. 7 - the fixed-flux binomial source swap: the summand definitions `doubledSourcefreeSummand` / `doubledPairSummand` and the `m |-> M - m` involution. `SourcefreeConnectionUnconditional.lean`'s per-current `W(M) = D(M)` is verbatim Aizenman's `A = B = {x,y}` instance (his eq. (3.8)). * Proposition 3.1, eq. (3.2), p. 6 - sites whose statement *is* `<s_x s_y>^2 = P^{empty,empty}[x <-> y]`, which is that display verbatim. * §9, Lemma 9.2, p. 25, eq. (9.11) and Lemma 9.3, pp. 25-26 - the `ClusterConditioningFiber*` (SL-D2) cluster: Lemma 9.2 is exactly "the correlation in the system obtained by setting the interaction to zero on all the bonds in B(w1)", i.e. the subgraph/reduced-interaction conditioning. Hedged with `cf.` because Aizenman's own use of it is via the Griffiths inequality, an inequality rather than a collapse. * §2, eq. (2.4), p. 4 - `SourcefreeConnectionCurrentDeriv.lean`, whose subject is the random-current weight `w(n) = prod_b (beta J_b)^{n_b}/n_b!` and its beta-scaling, not switching. Same-citation adjuncts, corrected to avoid leaving the files self-contradictory (a `Lemma 3.2, §3` anchor next to a `§4, Eqs. (4.x)` pointer): the nonexistent section-4 pinpoints in `SourcefreeConnectionEdgeReachableLeg.lean` and `SourcefreeConnectionTruncatedFourPointMass.lean`; the latter's P2-ii backbone reference now names Proposition 9.2, p. 24, eqs. (9.5)-(9.7), the random-walk representation. Also in these files (#5032 item 4): FFS `Thm 9.35` / `Lemma 9.36` are displayed equations, ch. 9, pp. 198-199 (verified on the local PDF: running heads `198 9. Models without magnetic field` and `9.2 Examples 199`), not theorems, not in ch. 12, and not the switching lemma - FFS contains no switching/backbone material at all. The labels are corrected and the switching role transferred to Aizenman Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5). Doc comments only; no declaration, statement, proof or import is touched. Refs #5032 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… 2, 3, 5b, 6) Page numbers re-derived first-hand from `.self-local/refs/Glimm.Jaffe.P428.*.pdf` (book = PDF - 16 in ch. 4), not carried over from the issue. * item 2 - Corollary 4.3.4 is on book p. 62: PDF 78 opens with the running head `62 4 Correlation Inequalities and the Lee-Yang Theorem` and carries `Corollary 4.3.4.` plus its `PROOF.`; book p. 61 (PDF 77) carries `Corollary 4.3.3.`, and book p. 68 is inside §4.5 (Lee-Yang). Fixes `AmbientLattice/TruncatedFunctions/ThreePoint.lean` (`pp. 68ff`) and `Inequalities/Lebowitz/Cor434.lean` (`p. 61`). * item 3 - `Inequalities/GKS.lean`'s reference block named only Theorem 4.1.1, so the Glimm-Jaffe source of `gks_second` was never given. PDF 73 (book 57) has `Theorem 4.1.1` -> `(4.1.9) 0 <= <xi^A>` (GKS-I) and `Theorem 4.1.3` -> `(4.1.11) 0 <= <xi^A xi^B> - <xi^A><xi^B>` (GKS-II) on the same page; the GKS-II line is added and the existing (correct) Friedli-Velenik Thm 3.49 citation is kept. * item 5b - `SourcefreeConnectionLebowitzConvolutionBound.lean` called `lebowitz_four_zero_field` "the corrected form of GHS/FV eq. (3.45)". FV (3.45) is the high-temperature (tanh) representation of the partition function, and the result is the four-point Lebowitz inequality, not GHS. It is re-anchored on Glimm-Jaffe §4.3, Corollaries 4.3.2-4.3.3, pp. 60-61 - the anchor `Inequalities/Lebowitz/LebowitzFour.lean` itself carries (PDF 76 = book 60 heads `Corollary 4.3.2 (Lebowitz Inequalities)`). * item 6 - two live mislabels. `GHS/TruncatedDefs.lean`'s `truncated2_nonneg` claimed "non-negative by GKS-II", which is false on the `i = j` branch: that branch's proof is `gks_first` + `abs_correlation_le_one` + `nlinarith`, and GKS-II gives nothing there. The doc now splits the two branches and names Thm 4.1.3, (4.1.11), p. 57 and Thm 4.1.1, (4.1.9), p. 57 respectively. `Concrete/LatticeGraphCorrelation/FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicity.lean` credited "GJ §4.2 Prop 4.2.1 (GKS-I)" for a nonnegativity statement, but Proposition 4.2.1 is coupling monotonicity; it is re-anchored on GKS-I with that distinction recorded. Doc comments only; no declaration, statement, proof or import is touched. Refs #5032 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…#5032 items 2, 3, 4) Four `docs/index.md` rows carried the same defects fixed on the Lean side: * `:657` - twice: the quoted Glimm-Jaffe display `2^{3/2}<t_i q_j q_k> <= 2^{3/2}<t_i><q_j q_k>` is attributed to "p. 61, verified verbatim" but sits inside the `PROOF.` of Corollary 4.3.4 on PDF 78 = book p. 62; and the trailing "GJ §4.3 Cor 4.3.4, p. 61". Both -> p. 62. * `:1188` - "Cor 4.3.4 pp. 68ff" -> p. 62 (book p. 68 is in §4.5, Lee-Yang). * `:1281` - the row bundled GKS-I and GKS-II under Thm 4.1.1, which states only `(4.1.9) 0 <= <xi^A>`; GKS-II is `(4.1.11)` under Thm 4.1.3, same book page 57. The row now names both. * `:1771` - "Chapter 12 (Theorem 9.35, Lemma 9.36)": `(9.35)` and `(9.36)` are displayed equations in FFS ch. 9 (book pp. 198-199, running heads `198 9. Models without magnetic field` and `9.2 Examples 199`), not theorems and not in ch. 12. The row now says so. `docs/index.md` prose only. The implementation record, with the primary-source extraction table, the per-site classification and the before/after gate measurements, is in `.self-local/reports/dev-implement-5032-pra.md`. Refs #5032 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…uation ranges (#5032) Round-1 review follow-up (two mechanical citation fixes). * `SourcefreeConnectionEdgeEmptyLeg.lean`: the inline proof citation of the Stage A product identity spanned a line break ("Aizenman 1982\n§4"), so the single-line sweep left it behind and the file contradicted its own header. Re-anchored to `Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5)` (the switching lemma), matching the header and the sibling `SourcefreeConnectionEdgeReachableLeg.lean`. * `docs/index.md`: dropped both `Eqs. (4.3)-(4.10)` fragments; Aizenman's §4 contains only eqs. (4.1)/(4.2). The first site keeps `Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5)`; the second keeps the bare `Lemma 9.2/9.3, §9` pointer. Comment/prose only; no proof term changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
phasetr
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 12, 2026 01:50
phasetr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2026
… bricks Eight progress rows for the random-current / Ornstein-Zernike bricks still pinned "Aizenman (1982), Lemma 9.2/9.3" while the modules they describe were re-anchored elsewhere by PR #5033. The docs now mirror what each module's own reference block says: SourcefreeConnectionCurrentDeriv -> §2, eq. (2.4), p. 4 SourcefreeConnectionRatioDerivative -> Proposition 3.1, eq. (3.2), p. 6 SourcefreeConnectionExcessEdgeSum -> Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5) SourcefreeConnectionEdgePivotal -> Lemma 3.1, p. 7 SourcefreeConnectionEdgeReachableLeg -> Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5) None of the eight belongs to the §9 Lemma 9.2/9.3 bucket: the only modules still carrying that anchor are the ClusterConditioningFiber* files (SL-D2), which no row in this range cites. One row already carried "Aizenman 1982 Lemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5)" in its body while its trailing reference list still said 9.2/9.3; the two now agree.
4 tasks
phasetr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2026
…esidue (#5034) Correct the "Simon-Lieb inequality" citation, previously attributed to a nonexistent "FV Prop 9.31" and a mislabeled "GJ §5.1" — neither source contains this result. This is PR-B of #5032 (PR-A merged as #5033, `2270c5e6`), the final authorized scope item of #5032: item 5 (FV "Prop 9.31", 31 sites / 13 files), item 7f (GJ §5.1 mislabeling, 31 Lean lines / 11 files, 15 overlapping item 5), and Med-3 (8 `docs/index.md` rows carrying a stale post-PR-A "Aizenman 1982 Lemma 9.2/9.3" pin). Deliberately excluded: the ~104-site pre-existing `§17.5 pp. 304–306` mis-pin (a different section, separable, left for a future errata PR), the `SummabilityCluster.lean` in-range-object-anchor scoping question, a pre-existing "Six supporting lemmas" wording mismatch in `SimonLieb.lean:11` untouched by this diff, and the `RandomCurrent`-family §5.1 classification (a distinct, separable defect). Why: GJ §5.1 (pp. 72-74) is "Pure and Mixed Phases" — the truncated-correlation cluster property — and never states an edge-peeling/Simon-Lieb result; FV has no "Prop 9.31" at all (FV Ch. 9 tops out at Prop 9.7 and is unrelated). The correct attribution is Simon, B. (1980), Comm. Math. Phys. 77, 111-126, and Lieb, E.H. (1980), Comm. Math. Phys. 77, 127-135 — cited by author/year/journal/pages only, since neither paper's full text is in the repo's local corpus. GJ §17.8 Remark 3, p. 317 corroborates this as the source GJ itself points to. The Lean mathematics (`IsingModel/Inequalities/SimonLieb.lean`, `correlation_inducedGraph_simon_lieb`) was always correct; only the citation was wrong. What was considered and rejected: (1) the Lieb 1980 page range — GJ's own OCR bibliography reads `127-136` (a degraded scan), while the FFS 1992 bibliography (clean text layer) reads `127-135`; the clean source was preferred and corroborated independently in round 3. (2) An FFS eq. (12.27) sentence added in round 1 was rejected and reworded in round 2/3 after two independent reviewers (this repo's reviewer and codex) found it misattributed "special case of Simon-Lieb" to the equation itself rather than to Griffiths' third inequality, which is what FFS actually states. (3) A page-number pin for the FFS anchor was rejected in favor of `eq. (12.27), §12.2`: the repo-local FFS PDF is a 2012 Ghostscript re-typeset whose running header (237) and own index (239) disagree by two pages for the same passage, so no page number is verifiable against the 1992 Springer printing from repo-local evidence; the equation number and section are printing-independent and were read verbatim. Verified over 3 independent review rounds (this repo's reviewer + independent codex cross-review each round, full agreement on every blocking finding): round 1 found 3 High self-contradictions/false-negatives in the initial edit (fixed), round 2 found 1 blocking misattribution in the newly-added FFS sentence (fixed), round 3 APPROVE with all gates green — `lake build` (0 warnings/errors), `scripts/audit_gate.py --full` (V1-V4 pass), and `scripts/citation_audit.py` (37 cleared, 0 new) all re-run independently at HEAD. AC4 comment-only verified over all 16 touched `.lean` files (nested-comment-stripped, byte-identical to `main`, with a fail-open self-test on the stripper). Anti-scope-creep token ledger: `9.31` 31→0, `FV Prop` 12→0, `§5.1 pp. 76–79` 8→0, `Simon 1980`/`Lieb 1980` 0→46/0→46, 17 paths all `M` (no add/delete/rename), no file outside the diff changed. Refs #5032 Refs #4984 Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
PR-A of the errata campaign scoped in #5032 (
dev-issue-managerscoping freeze,2026-08-12, against main
1cd2ffd1): mechanical re-anchoring of doc-comment /docs/index.mdcitations whose correct target was already established, with noproof-term or statement changes. Items 5 and 7 (Simon–Lieb anchor, gated on a
dev-researchdispatch) are explicitly out of scope and remain for PR-B.Scope — 6 items fixed (55 sites / 20 files)
classified (not a blanket rename) into Aizenman Lemma 3.2 (p. 7, eq. (3.5),
switching lemma), Lemma 3.1 (p. 7), Proposition 3.1 (eq. (3.2), p. 6),
Proposition 9.2 (p. 24, eqs. (9.5)–(9.7)), or §9 Lemma 9.2 (p. 25, eq. (9.11)) /
Lemma 9.3 (pp. 25-26), each verified against
~/junk/0-pdf-for-translation/Aizenman.1982.p48....pdf.(old
p. 61/pp. 68ffwere both wrong; printed p. 62 running head verifiedfirst-hand), including
IsingModel/AmbientLattice/TruncatedFunctions/ThreePoint.lean:24.IsingModel/Inequalities/GKS.lean:10now alsonames GJ Theorem 4.1.3 / (4.1.11), p. 57, alongside the existing FV Theorem 3.49
citation (which already covered GKS-II; the defect was GJ's own GKS-II theorem
never being named).
corrected to FFS eq. (9.35), ch. 9, p. 198 / eq. (9.36), p. 199 (verified against
.self-local/refs/Fernandez.Frohlich.Sokal.1992.p465.*.pdfpp. 198-199: both arenumbered displays, not theorems/lemmas).
5b. Misused FV (3.45) — 1 site,
SourcefreeConnectionLebowitzConvolutionBound.lean:72, pinpoint removed.i = j/ GJ Prop 4.2.1 mislabeling — 2 sites(
GHS/TruncatedDefs.lean:172,FiniteVolumeCorrelationMonotonicity.lean:70-71),migrated from Errata: Glimm-Jaffe Proposition 4.2.4 does not exist, and Corollary 4.3.5's page is 63 not 62 #4993's round-2 review.
Adjunct sweep (beyond items 1-6). While re-anchoring the random-current tree,
the same Aizenman-1982 misattribution class was found outside the enumerated items
and fixed in the same pass: 10 comment lines across 2 files pinning a bare
§4,Eqs. (4.3)–(4.10),Eqs. (4.8)–(4.10)orEq. (4.12)— none of which exist(Aizenman's §4 labels only (4.1) and (4.2)). Sites:
IsingModel/Inequalities/SourcefreeConnectionEdgeReachableLeg.lean:50,51,158,391,458(5 lines; line 50 doubles as an item-1
Lemma 4.1site) andIsingModel/Inequalities/SourcefreeConnectionTruncatedFourPointMass.lean:65,80,85,124,273,314(6 lines, including the
Eq. (4.12)site at line 80 in the## Scope (honest limitation)paragraph). All re-anchored toLemma 3.2, p. 7, eq. (3.5)(theswitching lemma) or, for the random-walk representation, to
Proposition 9.2, p. 24, eqs. (9.5)–(9.7). Reproduce withgit show main:PATH | rg -n --pcre2 '§ ?4(?![.0-9])|Eqs?\. \(4\.[0-9]+\)'onIsingModel/Inequalities/SourcefreeConnection{EdgeReachableLeg,TruncatedFourPointMass}.lean.Round-1 review fixes (Med-1/Med-2). One
§4residue survived the first sweepbecause the string spans a line break in
SourcefreeConnectionEdgeEmptyLeg.lean:113-115((Aizenman 1982\n§4 / FFS Chapter 12; ...)— invisible to a single-line grep).docs/index.md:1780carriedtwo
Eqs. (4.3)–(4.10)ranges. Both fixed inbf4db83a; residue is now re-checkedwith a line-break-insensitive (whitespace-joined) scanner, not single-line grep.
Verification
Lemma\s*4\.\d, bare§\s*4,Eqs?\.\s*\(4\.\d+\),\(4\.(3|4|…|19)\),Thm/Theorem\s*9\.35,Lemma\s*9\.36)main: 37/11/8/15/8/4 hits;HEAD: 0/0/0/0/0/0Aizenmanmentions repo-wide, manually inspected§4,Lemma 4.1,(4.x)survives, wrapped or not--, nested/- -/,/-- -/,/-! -/, skipping string literals).leanfiles byte-identicalmainvsHEADafter stripping;docs/index.mdis prose only9.31(FV Prop 9.31) 31→31,§5.1221→221,3.45111→110 (only the item-5b site)rg "[ぁ-んァ-ン一-龯]" docs/index.md README.md)scripts/citation_audit.pyscripts/audit_gate.py --full(V1 noaxiom, V2 no sorry/admit/native_decide, V3 13 capstones axiom-free, V4 no Japanese)lake build(incremental, 4944 jobs)lake env lean IsingModel/Inequalities/SourcefreeConnectionEdgeEmptyLeg.lean(round-2, Codex)Independent review — 2 rounds, both APPROVE, Codex agreement both rounds
dev-review+ Codexcodex exec): found Med-1 (line-break-straddling§4residue inSourcefreeConnectionEdgeEmptyLeg.lean) and Med-2(
docs/index.md:1780doubleEqs. (4.3)–(4.10)). Both fixed inbf4db83a; see"Round-1 review fixes" above.
.self-local/reports/dev-review-5032-pra-round2.md, reviewed SHAbf4db83a): VERDICT: APPROVE. Independently re-verified every new anchoragainst the primary sources (Aizenman 1982, GJ, FFS PDFs read directly — pages
4, 6, 7, 12-13, 22, 57, 60-62, 198-199), re-ran the residue scan and the AC4
comment-only diff, and re-ran the anti-scope-creep gates. One Low finding, on the
PR-body wording only (not a code issue): the adjunct-sweep description in an
earlier draft undercounted the site list; corrected to 10 lines/10 sites above,
with the full enumeration including
EdgeReachableLeg.lean:51,458(
Eqs. (4.3)-(4.10)) andTruncatedFourPointMass.lean:80(
Eq. (4.12), Scope paragraph) that an earlier description omitted. Codexindependently re-ran a whitespace-normalized global scan (no residue), confirmed
all 19 changed files comment-only, and confirmed the anti-scope-creep gates —
full agreement, zero divergence, findings: none.
Deferred to PR-B (recorded here, not fixed in this PR)
docs/index.mdrows (lines 1772, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777,1780, 1781) pin a stale
Aizenman (1982), Lemma 9.2/9.3, §9reference: thisPR's Lean-header re-anchoring (item 1) moved the underlying modules' anchors to
§2 eq. (2.4)/Proposition 3.1 eq. (3.2)/Lemma 3.2 eq. (3.5)/Lemma 3.1, so these 8 docs rows now describe those modules with an anchortheir sources no longer use. Pre-existing on
main(count unchanged by thisPR — Med-2 only removed an equation range from one of the 8 rows). The
Lemma 9.2/9.3anchor is correct on the separateClusterConditioning*rows, so PR-B must resolve this row-by-row (switching lemma vs. conditioning
lemma), not blanket-replace.
H_low/ OZ-wall estimates the chapter does not actually contain (same false-descriptor class as item 4). 41 total
FFS (Ch.|Chapter) ?12mentions inIsingModel/; the suspect subset (not yet verified against the FFS PDF, whichneeds extraction first) is
SourcefreeConnectionLebowitzConvolutionDegenerateBound.lean:47,143,222,SourcefreeConnectionLebowitzConvolutionBound.lean:62-63,SourcefreeConnectionEdgePivotal.lean:13,92,274,SourcefreeConnectionRatioDerivative.lean:52,58,452. An exact count must bere-derived in PR-B rather than carried over.
remain errata: residual mis-attributions left out of PR #5031 (Aizenman "Lemma 4.1", GJ Cor 4.3.4 page, GKS-II rows, FFS "Thm 9.35", FV "Prop 9.31") #5032's original PR-B scope, gated on a prior
dev-researchdispatch(neither GJ nor FV contains a "Simon–Lieb inequality"; the correct anchor is
primary literature — Simon, CMP 77 (1980) 111–126 / Lieb, CMP 77 (1980)
127–135).
Refs #5032
Refs #4984