Add test for exact googol (10**100) in intword

[BlocksecPHD]

Summary

This PR adds a test case for exact googol (10**100) in intword() function.

Context

• Issue intword fails to parse numbers >= 1 Googol #134 reported that intword(10**100) returns the raw number instead of "1.0 googol"
• PR Fix plural form for intword and improve performance #273 fixed the underlying issue by using bisect instead of for-loop
• However, the test for exact googol was not added in that PR
• The existing tests cover 2e100 (2 googols) and 10**101 (10 googols), but not 10**100 (1 googol)

Changes

Added test case ([10**100], "1.0 googol") to tests/test_number.py

Testing

The test passes on the current repo code (which already includes the fix from PR #273). This ensures the googol edge case is covered in the test suite for future releases.

Fixes #134

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.54%. Comparing base (92b4117) to head (853e9e4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #304   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.54%   99.54%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         871      871           
=======================================
  Hits          867      867           
  Misses          4        4           

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos-latest	97.47% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest	97.47% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest	95.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[hugovk]

Testing

This test will pass once version 4.15.0 (containing the fix from PR #273) is released to PyPI.

What do you mean? It has been released: https://pypi.org/project/humanize/4.15.0/

And why does it matter if it's released to PyPI? The tests test the code in this repo.

[BlocksecPHD]

Hi @hugovk, thank you for pointing that out! You're right - the tests test the code in this repo, not the PyPI package.

I've updated the PR description to correct that misleading statement. The test passes on the current repo code (which already has the fix from PR #273), and ensures the googol edge case is covered in the test suite.