Skip to content

[3.13] Provide a cross-reference to PEP 798 unpacking syntax (GH-152454)#152458

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.13from
miss-islington:backport-8107c53-3.13
Closed

[3.13] Provide a cross-reference to PEP 798 unpacking syntax (GH-152454)#152458
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.13from
miss-islington:backport-8107c53-3.13

Conversation

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit 8107c53)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com
Co-authored-by: Rishit Agnihotri Twix1288@users.noreply.github.com

(cherry picked from commit 8107c53)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rishit Agnihotri <Twix1288@users.noreply.github.com>

@rhettinger rhettinger left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PEP 798 is a 3.15 feature, so I don't think a 3.13 backport is warranted.

@bedevere-app

bedevere-app Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@rhettinger rhettinger closed this Jun 28, 2026
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-8107c53-3.13 branch June 28, 2026 03:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting changes docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants