[ET-VK] Introduce vTensorPtr to prevent reference invalidation and remove get_val() API#2978
Closed
SS-JIA wants to merge 5 commits intogh/SS-JIA/32/basefrom
Closed
[ET-VK] Introduce vTensorPtr to prevent reference invalidation and remove get_val() API#2978SS-JIA wants to merge 5 commits intogh/SS-JIA/32/basefrom
vTensorPtr to prevent reference invalidation and remove get_val() API#2978SS-JIA wants to merge 5 commits intogh/SS-JIA/32/basefrom
Conversation
…remove `get_val()` API ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/2978
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit b99f1d8 with merge base 62a4dd3 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
SS-JIA
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
…remove `get_val()` API ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) ghstack-source-id: 222072108 Pull Request resolved: #2978
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55984187 |
…dation and remove `get_val()` API" ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) [ghstack-poisoned]
SS-JIA
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
…remove `get_val()` API Pull Request resolved: #2978 ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. ghstack-source-id: 222074671 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/)
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55984187 |
…dation and remove `get_val()` API" ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55984187 |
SS-JIA
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2024
…remove `get_val()` API Pull Request resolved: #2978 ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. ghstack-source-id: 222196863 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/)
…dation and remove `get_val()` API" ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55984187 |
SS-JIA
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2024
…remove `get_val()` API Pull Request resolved: #2978 ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. ghstack-source-id: 222197446 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/)
junpi3
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2024
…dation and remove `get_val()` API" ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/) [ghstack-poisoned]
SS-JIA
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2024
…remove `get_val()` API Pull Request resolved: #2978 ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. ghstack-source-id: 222224052 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D55984187](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55984187/)
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55984187 |
copyrightly
pushed a commit
to copyrightly/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2024
…get_val()` API (pytorch#2978) Summary: ## Context Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a `vTensor` retrieved from a `ComputeGraph`'s list of `values_` like so: ``` vTensor& vten = graph.get_val(vref).toTensor(); ``` However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored, `values_` which is a `std::vector` may have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid. To protect against this, this changeset introduces the `vTensorPtr` class which is a wrapper around a `vTensor*`. When constructed, it will increment a counter in the `ComputeGraph` instance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter. `ComputeGraph` cannot add any values while the counter is not zero. Since `Value` can be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes the `get_val` function entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour. ghstack-source-id: 222224052 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: jorgep31415 Differential Revision: D55984187
Contributor
|
This pull request has been merged in 76d8513. |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
vTensorPtrto prevent reference invalidation and removeget_val()API #2978Context
Currently when writing operators developers will save a reference to a
vTensorretrieved from aComputeGraph's list ofvalues_like so:However, this is dangerous since if any values are added once the reference has been stored,
values_which is astd::vectormay have been resized and therefore have its contents moved, meaning the reference is now invalid.To protect against this, this changeset introduces the
vTensorPtrclass which is a wrapper around avTensor*. When constructed, it will increment a counter in theComputeGraphinstance, and when destroyed it will decrement the counter.ComputeGraphcannot add any values while the counter is not zero.Since
Valuecan be converted to other non-trivial types, this changeset also removes theget_valfunction entirely to guard against unsafe behaviour.Differential Revision: D55984187