Tester: rename inputs to example_inputs

[oscarandersson8218]

Rename inputs to example_inputs to differentiate between what's used as test data and what's used as example/calibration data.

Change-Id: Ibe6e65fd3f6ec14a8f27fe2270595a3835b1e038

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3800

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 1054c5e with merge base 13ba3a7 ():

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

• trunk / test-coreml-delegate / macos-job (gh) (trunk failure)
  RuntimeError: Command bash /Users/runner/work/_temp/exec_script failed with exit code 1

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[digantdesai]

differentiate between what's used as test data and what's used as example/calibration data.

Sorry I still don't understand the motivation. But if it is just a rename then sure.

[oscarandersson8218]

differentiate between what's used as test data and what's used as example/calibration data.

Sorry I still don't understand the motivation. But if it is just a rename then sure.

@digantdesai Yes, it's just a renaming. Prior to #2442, run_method() would use Tester.inputs if no inputs were provided to the function, but that's no longer the case. Tester.inputs is only used as example/calibration data (unless I'm missing something).

[facebook-github-bot]

@digantdesai has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

[facebook-github-bot]

@digantdesai merged this pull request in 8c70a50.