Skip to content

Do not build CUDA libs in Python jobs#2039

Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intorapidsai:branch-22.02from
jjacobelli:fix-build
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

Do not build CUDA libs in Python jobs#2039
rapids-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intorapidsai:branch-22.02from
jjacobelli:fix-build

Conversation

@jjacobelli
Copy link
Contributor

This PR should prevent building CUDA libs in Python jobs and speed up CI

Signed-off-by: Jordan Jacobelli <jjacobelli@nvidia.com>
@jjacobelli jjacobelli added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jan 27, 2022
@jjacobelli jjacobelli added this to the 22.02 milestone Jan 27, 2022
@jjacobelli jjacobelli requested a review from a team January 27, 2022 14:58
@jjacobelli jjacobelli self-assigned this Jan 27, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2039 (37b8912) into branch-22.02 (2e781c1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 37b8912 differs from pull request most recent head 1977c0c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1977c0c to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           branch-22.02    #2039   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         73.26%   73.26%           
=============================================
  Files               151      151           
  Lines              9736     9736           
=============================================
  Hits               7133     7133           
  Misses             2603     2603           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2e781c1...1977c0c. Read the comment docs.

@jjacobelli
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit e3273ee into rapidsai:branch-22.02 Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants