[REVIEW] Use edge_ids directly in uniform sampling call to prevent cost of edge_id lookup#2550
Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intorapidsai:branch-22.10from Aug 17, 2022
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-22.10 #2550 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 61.11%
===============================================
Files ? 106
Lines ? 5634
Branches ? 0
===============================================
Hits ? 3443
Misses ? 2191
Partials ? 0 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
BradReesWork
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2022
rlratzel
reviewed
Aug 17, 2022
rlratzel
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2022
Contributor
|
@gpucibot merge |
nv-rliu
pushed a commit
to nv-rliu/cugraph-gnn
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2025
…e_id lookup (#2550) This PR fixes rapidsai/cugraph#2520 **Speedup Details** We see a 2.6x speedup , ranging from 0.8x to 10x. **Benchmarking Gist:** Benchmark Link: https://gist.github.com/VibhuJawa/38da2f151141c0582a0532a364458602 **Benchmarking Table:** | dataset | fanout | seednodes | PR cugraph\_t (ms) | Main cugraph\_t (ms) | Speedup | | ----------- | ------ | --------- | ------------------ | -------------------- | ------------ | | livejournal | 5 | 6400 | 9.77469367 | 36.14 | 3.697743722 | | livejournal | 5 | 12800 | 10.24105188 | 37.04 | 3.617198402 | | livejournal | 5 | 25600 | 11.25398077 | 39.31 | 3.492790318 | | livejournal | 5 | 51200 | 19.90233963 | 48.31 | 2.427492542 | | livejournal | 20 | 6400 | 11.08045933 | 37.40 | 3.375111171 | | livejournal | 20 | 12800 | 12.41813744 | 39.78 | 3.203001674 | | livejournal | 20 | 25600 | 20.01964133 | 48.59 | 2.426926934 | | livejournal | 20 | 51200 | 20.479394 | 51.75 | 2.526783655 | | livejournal | 40 | 6400 | 18.02444187 | 38.42 | 2.13166189 | | livejournal | 40 | 12800 | 15.95887286 | 41.13 | 2.577490516 | | livejournal | 40 | 25600 | 30.42667777 | 49.21 | 1.617178892 | | livejournal | 40 | 51200 | 31.27987486 | 56.83 | 1.816870032 | | ogbn-arxiv | 5 | 6400 | 7.269433069 | 6.81 | 0.9363815769 | | ogbn-arxiv | 5 | 12800 | 3.700939559 | 6.48 | 1.750559107 | | ogbn-arxiv | 5 | 25600 | 7.43439748 | 6.74 | 0.9070057901 | | ogbn-arxiv | 5 | 51200 | 8.364707041 | 8.92 | 1.06631151 | | ogbn-arxiv | 20 | 6400 | 3.526507211 | 6.01 | 1.704996136 | | ogbn-arxiv | 20 | 12800 | 7.11795785 | 6.35 | 0.8917298112 | | ogbn-arxiv | 20 | 25600 | 9.83814247 | 8.87 | 0.9015745857 | | ogbn-arxiv | 20 | 51200 | 19.16898326 | 15.28 | 0.797070347 | | ogbn-arxiv | 40 | 6400 | 7.47879348 | 6.11 | 0.8169812813 | | ogbn-arxiv | 40 | 12800 | 8.980390432 | 7.44 | 0.828701598 | | ogbn-arxiv | 40 | 25600 | 9.939847551 | 9.78 | 0.9838518889 | | ogbn-arxiv | 40 | 51200 | 21.65015471 | 17.39 | 0.8032186603 | | reddit | 5 | 6400 | 4.485681872 | 47.60 | 10.61118206 | | reddit | 5 | 12800 | 8.203881669 | 48.36 | 5.894866842 | | reddit | 5 | 25600 | 10.19984847 | 51.61 | 5.05981494 | | reddit | 5 | 51200 | 25.52061113 | 61.15 | 2.39617171 | | reddit | 20 | 6400 | 9.60336474 | 51.21 | 5.333003796 | | reddit | 20 | 12800 | 22.43147231 | 60.14 | 2.681092588 | | reddit | 20 | 25600 | 23.204309 | 70.10 | 3.021163687 | | reddit | 20 | 51200 | 27.07365799 | 76.18 | 2.813953476 | | reddit | 40 | 6400 | 24.64297758 | 60.25 | 2.445081387 | | reddit | 40 | 12800 | 23.05950785 | 68.38 | 2.965428975 | | reddit | 40 | 25600 | 24.84033842 | 74.12 | 2.983957307 | | reddit | 40 | 51200 | 30.75342988 | 87.18 | 2.834787134 | **Bottleneck after the PR** ```python Timer unit: 1e-06 s Total time: 0.022579 s File: /datasets/vjawa/miniconda3/envs/cugraph_dev_aug_10/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cugraph-22.10.0a0+45.g3ff5b53ff.dirty-py3.9-linux-x86_64.egg/cugraph/gnn/graph_store.py Function: sample_neighbors at line 181 Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents ============================================================== 181 def sample_neighbors( 182 self, nodes, fanout=-1, edge_dir="in", prob=None, replace=False 183 ): ................ 216 """ 217 218 1 2.0 2.0 0.0 if edge_dir not in ["in", "out"]: 219 raise ValueError( 220 f"edge_dir must be either 'in' or 'out' got {edge_dir} instead" 221 ) 222 223 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 if edge_dir == "in": 224 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 sg = self.extracted_reverse_subgraph_without_renumbering 225 else: 226 sg = self.extracted_subgraph_without_renumbering 227 228 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 if not hasattr(self, '_sg_node_dtype'): 229 self._sg_node_dtype = sg.edgelist.edgelist_df['src'].dtype 230 231 # Uniform sampling assumes fails when the dtype 232 # if the seed dtype is not same as the node dtype 233 1 774.0 774.0 3.4 nodes = cudf.from_dlpack(nodes).astype(self._sg_node_dtype) 234 235 2 19303.0 9651.5 85.5 sampled_df = uniform_neighbor_sample( 236 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 sg, start_list=nodes, fanout_vals=[fanout], 237 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 with_replacement=replace, 238 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 is_edge_ids=True # FIXME: Does not seem to do anything 239 ) 240 241 # handle empty graph case 242 1 17.0 17.0 0.1 if len(sampled_df) == 0: 243 return None, None, None 244 245 # we reverse directions when directions=='in' 246 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 if edge_dir == "in": 247 2 136.0 68.0 0.6 sampled_df.rename( 248 1 1.0 1.0 0.0 columns={"destinations": src_n, "sources": dst_n}, inplace=True 249 ) 250 else: 251 sampled_df.rename( 252 columns={"sources": src_n, "destinations": dst_n}, inplace=True 253 ) 254 255 1 2.0 2.0 0.0 return ( 256 1 786.0 786.0 3.5 sampled_df[src_n].to_dlpack(), 257 1 776.0 776.0 3.4 sampled_df[dst_n].to_dlpack(), 258 1 776.0 776.0 3.4 sampled_df['indices'].to_dlpack(), 259 ) ``` Authors: - Vibhu Jawa (https://github.com/VibhuJawa) Approvers: - Brad Rees (https://github.com/BradReesWork) - Rick Ratzel (https://github.com/rlratzel) - Alex Barghi (https://github.com/alexbarghi-nv) URL: rapidsai/cugraph#2550
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes #2520
Speedup Details
We see a 2.6x speedup , ranging from 0.8x to 10x.
Benchmarking Gist:
Benchmark Link: https://gist.github.com/VibhuJawa/38da2f151141c0582a0532a364458602
Benchmarking Table:
Bottleneck after the PR