Skip to content

DO NOT MERGE: use citestwheel image built on cuda-base instead of cuda-devel#521

Closed
gforsyth wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
smaller_citestweel
Closed

DO NOT MERGE: use citestwheel image built on cuda-base instead of cuda-devel#521
gforsyth wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
smaller_citestweel

Conversation

@gforsyth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

xref rapidsai/build-planning#143
xref rapidsai/ci-imgs#400

Swapping over to a citestwheel image built on top of cuda-base instead of cuda-devel - pushing up this branch for testing before we merge in the ci-imgs PR

@gforsyth gforsyth closed this Apr 16, 2026
rapids-bot Bot pushed a commit to rapidsai/cucim that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2026
I'm testing out smaller base images for wheel testing in #1116 and those tests flagged up that we're missing a `cusolver` dependency on wheel-only installs (the previous testing images have a full cuda toolkit installed beforehand).

The missing dependency turns out to be due to a `cupy` bug upstream with wheel-only installs (reported in cupy/cupy#10095).

This is a temporary workaround (if we want one) to enable switching to smaller test images (and also allowing end-users to use `cucim` on wheel-only installs)

xref rapidsai/build-planning#143
xref rapidsai/ci-imgs#400
xref rapidsai/shared-workflows#521

Authors:
  - Gil Forsyth (https://github.com/gforsyth)
  - https://github.com/jakirkham

Approvers:
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)
  - https://github.com/jakirkham

URL: #1117
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant