Reduce transport allocation and client hot-path overhead - #196
Closed
Alek99 wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Jul 22, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks
🆕 6 new benchmarks
⏩ 1 skipped benchmark1
Performance Changes
| Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | test_first_payload_area_core_2d |
9.5 ms | 7.2 ms | +32.74% |
| 🆕 | test_datetime_seconds_fused_one_copy_ingest |
N/A | 3.1 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | test_first_payload_scatter_direct_rgba |
N/A | 12.1 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | test_first_payload_stacked_bar_reuses_category_geometry |
N/A | 430.7 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | test_hexbin_payload_reuses_precomputed_center_bounds |
N/A | 960.3 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | test_memory_report_counts_without_payload_blob |
N/A | 7.4 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | test_notebook_repr_line_streams_escaped_document |
N/A | 11.9 ms | N/A |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing agent/transport-quick-wins (6e96a70) with main (2a7d898)
Footnotes
-
1 benchmark was skipped, so the baseline result was used instead. If it was deleted from the codebase, click here and archive it to remove it from the performance reports. ↩
Loading