Set XY's competitive product north star - #313
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (22)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR removes claim-guardrail tooling and its CI, Makefile, verification, packaging, and test integrations. It also revises benchmark evidence guidance, product positioning, staged roadmap documentation, contribution requirements, and production-readiness checks. ChangesClaim evidence and product documentation
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
Summary
Why
The existing README primarily positioned XY as a large-data 2D specialist. This change makes the intended destination unmistakable: one charting system for ordinary and massive datasets, any chart family, leading performance, and complete design control. The benchmark program becomes the evidence system for proving progress against every relevant competitor rather than one favorable scatter workload.
Validation
pre-commit run --all-filesruff check .ruff format --check .pytest tests/test_verify_local.py tests/test_verify_ci_workflow.py tests/test_verify_sdist.py -q(148 passed)python3 scripts/verify_ci_workflow.pySummary by CodeRabbit