Added tests for unordered list

[SaidShah]

• Related GitHub issue(s) linked in PR description
• Destination branch merged, built and tested with your changes
• Code formatted and follows best practices and patterns
• Code builds cleanly (no additional warnings or errors)
• Manually tested
• Automated tests are passing
• No decreases in automated test coverage
• Documentation updated (readme, docs, comments, etc.)
• Localization: No hard-coded error messages in code files (minimally in string constants)
• New component and/ or properties? Make sure to update storybook

Closes #31

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #56 into main will increase coverage by 0.73%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #56      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   20.62%   21.35%   +0.73%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines         897      899       +2     
  Branches      209      209              
==========================================
+ Hits          185      192       +7     
+ Misses        702      697       -5     
  Partials       10       10              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/molecules/lists/unordered-list.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (+33.33%)	⬆️
src/atoms/forms/radio-button-input.tsx	100.00% <0.00%> (+12.50%)	⬆️
src/atoms/typography/paragraph.tsx	100.00% <0.00%> (+14.28%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2368707...4fadecb. Read the comment docs.

[SaidShah]

@jstevenson I did change it, thank you for the input👍.

[brandongregoryscott]

Approving this (and following PRs to backfill tests) for now, but I'll wait on merging all of them until we decide on whether to pull in @testing-library/jest-dom for the extended matchers.

[brandongregoryscott]

Is there a reason for using faker rather than just using a static class name without spaces? This is less readable, is slower, uses more memory, and as your update shows, can be wrong.

While it's not something that really needs to be randomized, as a general rule of thumb, if it doesn't need to be a specific value, I prefer to keep the data randomized - it helps shed light on edge cases that might not be handled and to be honest, we use faker all over the place - not sure we're really concerned about memory usage for unit testing at this scale.