Skip to content

RFC: Postfix match #3295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
conradludgate wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+313 −0
Open

RFC: Postfix match #3295

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
dfc2e5f
start doc
Jul 10, 2022
b13f614
comment on lifetime extension
Jul 10, 2022
e5c4fde
edit
Jul 19, 2022
1c77769
alternatives
Jul 23, 2022
ce40102
typos
Jul 23, 2022
fb8769b
demote tap proposal and explain precedence
Aug 31, 2022
6b7cecf
add comment on future postfix syntax
conradludgate Jan 19, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
add comment on future postfix syntax 
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
  • Loading branch information
@conradludgate @joshtriplett
conradludgate and joshtriplett authored Jan 19, 2023
commit 6b7cecfbaa4f11d0beb4839a113d63e71c98aa38
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion text/0000-postfix-match.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -310,4 +310,4 @@ use-cases of match would cause more [subtle bugs](https://fasterthanli.me/articl
# Future possibilities
[future-possibilities]: #future-possibilities

I can't think of anything related to match that could be improved in this area
In theory, some other Rust constructs could also have postfix alternatives, but this RFC should not be taken as precedent for doing so. This RFC only proposes postfix `match`.