Conversation
3af38df to
13c89a9
Compare
Currently the way to work across crates is stability attributes, so this is ok. If we decide to land this though the |
|
Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams: No concerns currently listed. Once these reviewers reach consensus, this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
|
If we stabilize the impl then we should also stabilize the error type? |
|
That's what I'm thinking, yeah. |
|
Changes look good to me, thanks @tinaun! |
|
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
|
@alexcrichton I think this is good to go, but I'm not sure if I understand the rfcbot process on PRs 100% so not going to r=you myself. |
src/libcore/char.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To be conservative, could this remove Copy, PartialEq, and Eq?
|
Ah no worries @Mark-Simulacrum. @tinaun I added one minor comment about the error type but otherwise this should be good to go. |
|
@tinaun oh it's ok to leave |
|
whoops, totally thought i removed copy |
|
Ah it looks like some of the tests are failing with the removal of |
|
The final comment period is now complete. |
|
fixed; squashed. |
|
@bors: r+ Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit fd9d7aa has been approved by |
|
@bors rollup |
add `FromStr` Impl for `char` fixes rust-lang#24939. is it possible to use pub(restricted) instead of using a stability attribute for the internal error representation? is it needed at all?
fixes #24939.
is it possible to use pub(restricted) instead of using a stability attribute for the internal error representation? is it needed at all?