Rollup of 6 pull requests#105166
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This macro serves as a placeholder for future type ascription syntax to make sure that the semantic implementation keeps working.
Use it in all UI tests that are about the semantics and not the syntax of type ascription.
Co-authored-by: Takayuki Maeda <takoyaki0316@gmail.com>
Add `type_ascribe!` macro as placeholder syntax for type ascription This makes it still possible to test the internal semantics of type ascription even once the `:`-syntax is removed from the parser. The macro now gets used in a bunch of UI tests that test the semantics and not syntax of type ascription. I might have forgotten a few tests but this should hopefully be most of them. The remaining ones will certainly be found once type ascription is removed from the parser altogether. Part of rust-lang#101728
Make `VecDeque::new_in` unstably const (See rust-lang#105072)
…gle-to-var, r=notriddle Migrate summary toggle filter to CSS variable r? `@notriddle`
…r=oli-obk clarify comment on Deref promotion r? `@oli-obk`
Add tracking issue number for `file_create_new` feature It was missing a tracking issue, so I opened one (rust-lang#105135).
…e-list-font, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: use simpler CSS for setting the font on scraped examples
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: 11663b1b48 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (cef44f5): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
type_ascribe!macro as placeholder syntax for type ascription #104614 (Addtype_ascribe!macro as placeholder syntax for type ascription)VecDeque::new_inunstably const #105126 (MakeVecDeque::new_inunstably const)file_create_newfeature #105137 (Add tracking issue number forfile_create_newfeature)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup