Remove u32 on BrAnon and BoundTyKind::Anon in favor of BoundVar on Placeholder types#110036
Conversation
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
⌛ Trying commit b15195a with merge 556dcffdd3e6e31e4521e798443b02e2f28745f6... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (556dcffdd3e6e31e4521e798443b02e2f28745f6): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
|
Thanks! I would still like the new size assertion from the first commit in #110025. (I think this change reduces the size of @bors delegate=jackh726 |
|
✌️ @jackh726 can now approve this pull request |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (9452402): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
r? @nnethercote
Better alternative to #110025