bolt: remove deprecated option value for split-functions

[klensy]

Noticed warning at https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/4711883459/jobs/8356538964#step:26:40828, option value was removed at llvm/llvm-project@96f6ec5.

bolt only running on latest supported llvm (yes?), so it's safe to apply this patch.
cc @Kobzol

[rustbot]

r? @albertlarsan68

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[albertlarsan68]

r? @Kobzol

[rustbot]

Failed to set assignee to Kobzol: invalid assignee

Note: Only org members, users with write permissions, or people who have commented on the PR may be assigned.

[Kobzol]

(I don't have review rights).

Should be fine, let's do a perf test to make sure that perf. didn't regress.

@bors try @perf-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit e4a9d13 with merge 412a49bef7d568577d0294b36b624cb874947090...

[Kobzol]

@rust-timer queue

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 412a49bef7d568577d0294b36b624cb874947090 (412a49bef7d568577d0294b36b624cb874947090)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (412a49bef7d568577d0294b36b624cb874947090): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

[albertlarsan68]

@bors r=albertlarsan68,Kobzol

[bors]

📌 Commit e4a9d13 has been approved by albertlarsan68,Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e4a9d13 with merge e279f90...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: albertlarsan68,Kobzol
Pushing e279f90 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e279f90): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.7%	[-1.7%, -1.7%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.9%	[3.1%, 4.4%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0