Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly

[GeorgeWort]

No description provided.

[rustbot]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @petrochenkov (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

[petrochenkov]

Some more tests in tests/ui/asm also need an update.
@rustbot author

[petrochenkov]

r=me with the style nit addressed #117912 (comment)

[petrochenkov]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit e0bfb61 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 5f0ff7c...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[petrochenkov]

@bors retry

[petrochenkov]

(CI appears to be down in general.)

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[petrochenkov]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge fce2c02...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[compiler-errors]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 3a19e68...

[rust-log-analyzer]

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[petrochenkov]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 4e3dc97...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 4e3dc97 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4e3dc97): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[2.5%, 2.6%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-3.5%, -3.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[2.5%, 2.6%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.874s -> 673.421s (0.23%)
Artifact size: 313.92 MiB -> 313.90 MiB (-0.01%)