[rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls#128923
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Aug 10, 2024
Merged
[rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls#128923bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs cc @camelid |
fmease
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2024
Member
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128273 (Improve `Ord` violation help) - rust-lang#128807 (run-make: explaing why fmt-write-bloat is ignore-windows) - rust-lang#128903 (rustdoc-json-types `Discriminant`: fix typo) - rust-lang#128905 (gitignore: Add Zed and Helix editors) - rust-lang#128908 (diagnostics: do not warn when a lifetime bound infers itself) - rust-lang#128909 (Fix dump-ice-to-disk for RUSTC_ICE=0 users) - rust-lang#128910 (Differentiate between methods and associated functions in diagnostics) - rust-lang#128923 ([rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease
reviewed
Aug 10, 2024
| trait_, | ||
| rendering_params, | ||
| ); | ||
| if !impl_.is_negative_trait_impl() { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From what I remember this check shouldn't actually be necessary contrary to the one further down but since this is temporary, it's fine.
I will elaborate on that in my upcoming PR.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128923 - GuillaumeGomez:negative-impls-items, r=fmease [rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls Fixes rust-lang#128799. As discussed with `@fmease,` they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :) r? `@fmease`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #128799.
As discussed with @fmease, they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :)
r? @fmease