comm: Implement synchronous channels#12991
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Mar 25, 2014
Merged
Conversation
src/libstd/comm/mod.rs
Outdated
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am unsure if these are the best names.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As far as I can tell, RecvUnavailable could be considered a special case of Full. How would you feel about collapsing them together?
This commit contains an implementation of synchronous, bounded channels for Rust. This is an implementation of the proposal made last January [1]. These channels are built on mutexes, and currently focus on a working implementation rather than speed. Receivers for sync channels have select() implemented for them, but there is currently no implementation of select() for sync senders. Rust will continue to provide both synchronous and asynchronous channels as part of the standard distribution, there is no intent to remove asynchronous channels. This flavor of channels is meant to provide an alternative to asynchronous channels because like green tasks, asynchronous channels are not appropriate for all situations. [1] - https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-January/007924.html
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2014
This commit contains an implementation of synchronous, bounded channels for Rust. This is an implementation of the proposal made last January [1]. These channels are built on mutexes, and currently focus on a working implementation rather than speed. Receivers for sync channels have select() implemented for them, but there is currently no implementation of select() for sync senders. Rust will continue to provide both synchronous and asynchronous channels as part of the standard distribution, there is no intent to remove asynchronous channels. This flavor of channels is meant to provide an alternative to asynchronous channels because like green tasks, asynchronous channels are not appropriate for all situations. [1] - https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-January/007924.html
matthiaskrgr
pushed a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2022
…it-into-impl-root, r=Veykril Feat: extracted method from trait impl is placed in existing impl **Before** https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183872883-3b0eafd2-d1dc-440e-9e66-38e3372f8b64.mp4 **After** https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183875769-87f34c7d-52f0-4dfc-9766-f591ee738ebb.mp4 Previously, when triggering a method extraction from within an impl trait block, then this would always create a new impl block for the struct, even if there already is one. Now, if there is already an existing trait-less impl block, then it'll put the extracted method in there. **Caveats**: - It currently requires the target impl block to be non-empty. This limitation is because the current architecture takes a `node_to_insert_after` as reference for where to insert the extracted function. An empty impl block doesn't have such a reference node, since it's empty. It seems that supporting this requires a much larger and more complex change. - This is my first contribution in rust, so apologies for any beginner mistakes.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit contains an implementation of synchronous, bounded channels for
Rust. This is an implementation of the proposal made last January [1]. These
channels are built on mutexes, and currently focus on a working implementation
rather than speed. Receivers for sync channels have select() implemented for
them, but there is currently no implementation of select() for sync senders.
Rust will continue to provide both synchronous and asynchronous channels as part
of the standard distribution, there is no intent to remove asynchronous
channels. This flavor of channels is meant to provide an alternative to
asynchronous channels because like green tasks, asynchronous channels are not
appropriate for all situations.
[1] - https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-January/007924.html