doc: fix strict_provenance_lints tracking issue link#149030
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom Nov 18, 2025
Merged
doc: fix strict_provenance_lints tracking issue link#149030bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
strict_provenance_lints tracking issue link#149030bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead. cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
RalfJung
reviewed
Nov 17, 2025
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rust-lang/rust-analyzer is this something we should update in this repo? I was under the impression that it is largely auto-generated.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We regenerate it every now and then, but we also let people update it by hand if they want.
Member
|
Sounds good then, let's land this. @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
Rollup merge of #149030 - mkroening:doc-strict_provenance_lints, r=RalfJung doc: fix `strict_provenance_lints` tracking issue link This PR is a follow-up on 56ee492 and fixes the link to the `strict_provenance_lints` tracking issue. I am not sure whether we should touch this line too: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/66bc5a43e55eae14a2ec70b11004c88072fe7f02/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs#L2537 r? `@RalfJung`
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#147077 (std: move `kernel_copy` to `sys`) - rust-lang/rust#149030 (doc: fix `strict_provenance_lints` tracking issue link) - rust-lang/rust#149031 (Update books) - rust-lang/rust#149034 (update my email in mailmap) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a follow-up on 56ee492 and fixes the link to the
strict_provenance_lintstracking issue.I am not sure whether we should touch this line too:
rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs
Line 2537 in 66bc5a4
r? @RalfJung