Remove AttributeLintKind variants - part 5#155590
Remove AttributeLintKind variants - part 5#155590rust-bors[bot] merged 7 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
AttributeLintKind variants - part 5#155590Conversation
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing cc @jdonszelmann, @JonathanBrouwer Some changes occurred to diagnostic attributes. cc @mejrs |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…and not the old one
221174d to
80777dd
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
|
@bors r+ |
…uwer Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #155546 (Improve E0308 error message for `impl Trait` return mismatches) - #152834 (Fix incorrect `let` to `const` suggestion for pattern bindings) - #155425 (Remove duplicated `Flags` methods.) - #155547 (Use per-parent disambiguators everywhere) - #155590 (Remove AttributeLintKind variants - part 5)
Rollup merge of #155590 - GuillaumeGomez:rm-attributelintkind, r=JonathanBrouwer Remove AttributeLintKind variants - part 5 Part of #153099. r? @JonathanBrouwer
AttributeLintKind variants - part 5
|
@GuillaumeGomez for the 80777dd commit, I'm not sure that it worked as desired - https://thanks.rust-lang.org/rust/1.11.0/ now lists both
compared to before, when it was just one entry
Did you want separate entries for the two names? Though maybe #154175 caused the issue rather than this commit, though I can't imagine why |
|
@DanielEScherzer It's supposed to be one entry. Did I mess up the |
I'm not sure - there aren't any warnings in the thanks logs about the mailmap, and I double checked the commit multiple times and don't see anything wrong. Do you want to file an issue on r-l/thanks ? |
|
Opened rust-lang/thanks#103. |
Part of #153099.
r? @JonathanBrouwer