Skip to content

doc: no need for an explicit iter()#32607

Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
tshepang:we-gots-intoiterator
Mar 30, 2016
Merged

doc: no need for an explicit iter()#32607
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
tshepang:we-gots-intoiterator

Conversation

@tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs &heap

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 30, 2016

📌 Commit fd78ae8 has been approved by apasel422

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
…asel422

doc: no need for an explicit iter()
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #32580, #32591, #32603, #32605, #32606, #32607, #32608
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit fd78ae8 into rust-lang:master Mar 30, 2016
@tshepang tshepang deleted the we-gots-intoiterator branch April 1, 2016 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants