Avoid building LLVM just for llvm-dwp#81594
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 1, 2021
Merged
Conversation
When the LLVM backend is disabled, the llvm-project submodule is not checked out by default. This breaks the bootstrap test for cg_clif. As cg_clif doesn't support split debuginfo anyway llvm-dwp is not necessary. Other backends would likely not want to build LLVM just for llvm-dwp either.
bjorn3
added
T-bootstrap
Contributor
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 1fe1fa9 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Member
|
I am a bit worried about our story for support for split debug info if we're not expecting all backends to support it - is it a temporary problem for cranelift? |
Contributor
|
That's a good question, but I think this is a strict improvement whether Cranelift backend's lack of support for split debug info is temporary or not. The question probably should be a separate issue. |
Member
Author
|
By the time gimli gets enough support for writing split debuginfo to make it possible to implement split debuginfo in cg_clif I hope that it wouldn't be too hard to re-implement llvm-dwp in pure rust using gimli. If this isn't the case using the system dwp may also be an option. |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2021
…as-schievink Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#78641 (Let io::copy reuse BufWriter buffers) - rust-lang#79291 (Add error message for private fn) - rust-lang#81364 (Improve `rustc_mir_build::matches` docs) - rust-lang#81387 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 3) - rust-lang#81463 (Rename NLL* to Nll* accordingly to C-CASE) - rust-lang#81504 (Suggest accessing field when appropriate) - rust-lang#81529 (Fix invalid camel case suggestion involving unicode idents) - rust-lang#81536 (Indicate both start and end of pass RSS in time-passes output) - rust-lang#81592 (Rustdoc UI fixes) - rust-lang#81594 (Avoid building LLVM just for llvm-dwp) - rust-lang#81598 (Fix calling convention for CRT startup) - rust-lang#81618 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the LLVM backend is disabled, the llvm-project submodule is not checked out by default. This breaks the bootstrap test for cg_clif. As cg_clif doesn't support split debuginfo anyway llvm-dwp is not necessary. Other backends would likely not want to build LLVM just for llvm-dwp either.
Fixes https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1119