Fix outputs being not passed along in input-only derive case#6558
Merged
BMagnu merged 1 commit intoJan 30, 2025
Merged
Conversation
wookieejedi
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
wookieejedi
left a comment
wookieejedi
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fix works, thanks for the quick turnaround!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Followup to #6465:
Turns out, one of the modular curve derivation functions was not passing on the outputs the way it should to the derived set.
This resulted in one of the modular curve sets of the particle rework not having some of the outputs it should have had.