Skip to content

Add cuda graph status to prefill log#17836

Merged
ispobock merged 5 commits intomainfrom
prefill-log
Jan 30, 2026
Merged

Add cuda graph status to prefill log#17836
ispobock merged 5 commits intomainfrom
prefill-log

Conversation

@ispobock
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation

  • Log prefill after forward
  • Add prefill cuda graph status to log

Modifications

Accuracy Tests

Benchmarking and Profiling

Checklist

Review Process

  1. Ping Merge Oncalls to start the PR flow. See the PR Merge Process.
  2. Get approvals from CODEOWNERS and other reviewers.
  3. Trigger CI tests with comments or contact authorized users to do so.
    • /tag-run-ci-label, /rerun-failed-ci, /tag-and-rerun-ci
  4. After green CI and required approvals, ask Merge Oncalls to merge.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @ispobock, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the prefill logging mechanism to enhance observability and accuracy. By deferring the logging of prefill statistics until after the forward pass, the system can now include crucial information such as CUDA graph utilization directly within the logs. This change provides a more comprehensive view of prefill performance and helps in debugging and optimizing CUDA graph usage.

Highlights

  • Prefill Logging Timing: Prefill statistics logging has been re-timed to occur after the forward pass, ensuring that all relevant metrics, including CUDA graph status, are captured post-execution.
  • CUDA Graph Status in Logs: The prefill log messages now explicitly include whether a CUDA graph was successfully utilized for the forward operation, providing clearer insights into performance.
  • forward_extend Return Value: The forward_extend method in the model runner now returns a boolean flag indicating if a CUDA graph was used, allowing this information to be propagated for logging.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ispobock
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/tag-and-rerun-ci

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request successfully implements the logging of CUDA graph status for prefill operations, addressing the stated motivation. The changes involve deferring the log_prefill_stats call to after the forward pass and passing the can_run_cuda_graph status. The modifications are consistent across the relevant files, updating method signatures and variable assignments as needed.

@ispobock
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It seems embedding models ci failed. I'll have a check.

@ispobock
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/rerun-stage unit-test-backend-8-gpu-h200

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Triggered unit-test-backend-8-gpu-h200 to run independently (skipping dependencies).

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🔗 View workflow run

@ispobock ispobock merged commit 77a27e7 into main Jan 30, 2026
453 of 488 checks passed
@ispobock ispobock deleted the prefill-log branch January 30, 2026 08:56
charlesHsuGG pushed a commit to charlesHsuGG/sglang that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
sfiisf pushed a commit to sfiisf/sglang that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2026
Johnsonms pushed a commit to Johnsonms/sglang that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants