Fix mini-css-extract-plugin 0.4.3 issue

[karlvr]

Resolves #167

mini-css-extract-plugin reports additional, incorrect information for files that are refenced in CSS. The first time we see the file the module.userRequest is correct, and we add to moduleAssets correctly. However mini-css-extract-plugin then also reports the same file but with module.userRequest set to the CSS file that references it, which caused us to overwrite the good value in moduleAssets.

See the change in mini-css-extract-plugin that caused this webpack/mini-css-extract-plugin#177

[karlvr]

Sorry, I have found a case where the first time the asset is reported it is from the CSS file, so this doesn't work.

[karlvr]

I've pushed a change which is based on the normalModuleLoader fix that webdeveric/webpack-assets-manifest#40 uses. That seems to consistently report the files in an order so that our check where we don't overwrite what we know about a file works.

[alexander-akait]

/cc @mastilver

[fernandopasik]

would it be possible for someone to check this PR? @mastilver @danethurber ?

[alexander-akait]

hm, we need:

1. Tests here to avoid regressions
2. Somebody can create minimum reproducible test repo? I should investigate this situation

[Lyrkan]

@evilebottnawi Here is a minimal example for your second point: https://github.com/Lyrkan/repro-manifest-plugin-167

[alexander-akait]

WIP, confirmed.

i think it is bug in mini-css-webpack-plugin WIP

WIP on this inside webpack, please don't merge this, feedback soon

[fernandopasik]

@evilebottnawi is there a PR or issue in webpack to follow up this?

[alexander-akait]

@fernandopasik sorry, a lot of developers on holidays, we can merge this as workaround right now and fix it late

[fernandopasik]

oh, that would be great!

[fernandopasik]

@evilebottnawi are there any updates on this one? :)

WIP on this inside webpack, please don't merge this, feedback soon

do you know which issue or pr is there to follow?

[alexander-akait]

@fernandopasik can be merged as is, it will be solved in webpack@5 (need some refactor architecture)

[fernandopasik]

Oh good to know!
Could you merge this? Thanks for the hard work!!

[alexander-akait]

@fernandopasik don't have permissions on this

/cc @mastilver

[fernandopasik]

@mastilver any chance we can merge this fix? webpack 5 is still far away from release

[alexander-akait]

/cc @mastilver friendly ping again

[fernandopasik]

Hey @evilebottnawi, if @mastilver is not available do you think @danethurber could merge this?

[alexander-akait]

I don't know, PR can be merged

[eugef]

This fix works for me, any plans to merge the PR?

Meanwhile I decided to use instead https://github.com/webdeveric/webpack-assets-manifest

[alexander-akait]

/cc @karlvr can you do rebase?

[eugef]

@evilebottnawi as i can see this PR is already on top of the master branch, no rebase is needed

[alexander-akait]

@eugef oh, yes, sorry

[shellscape]

Thanks for opening this PR a while back, and I'm sorry that it didn't get attention sooner. We've landed a major refactor in #222 that has resulted in some significant conflicts. If this issue is still outstanding, please open a new PR after rebasing to upstream/master and please make sure to include tests.