Strict parsing #2#92
Conversation
(To be tweaked after @mshannon-sil determines a strategy on his end) --ECL
|
The build is broken - let's fix that first. |
|
So, strict parsing is false by default. Is that the desire as per Damien? |
That's because it requires the build_options update to Serval. It's not broken in and of itself. You can verify this locally. |
As I understood it...See this connected comment. |
johnml1135
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 14 of 14 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @ddaspit)
|
Previously, Enkidu93 (Eli C. Lowry) wrote…
ok. Makes sense. See comment in Serval about adding swagger docs about this. |
johnml1135
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 15 of 15 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ddaspit)
ddaspit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 2 of 14 files at r1, 15 of 15 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @Enkidu93)
This change is