docs: fix heading and disable lint rule#11840
Merged
Conversation
Match the camelCase function name `reinterpretComplex`, consistent with sibling packages (`reinterpret-complex128`, `reinterpret-complex64`, `reinterpret-boolean`).
Pin to the jsDelivr CDN path that includes the committed asset, matching the convention used by every other entry in `docs/talks.md`.
Top-level docs page does not expose `usage`/`examples` sections; mirror the directive used by `docs/contributing/zen_of_stdlib.md`.
develop on 2026-04-28..29
Member
|
/stdlib merge |
…it-review-2026-04-29
kgryte
approved these changes
May 1, 2026
Contributor
Coverage ReportNo coverage information available. |
Member
|
As the CI failure is not due to changes introduced in this PR, I'll go ahead and merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request:
developbetween 2026-04-28 18:13 and 2026-04-29 09:22 (16 commits, rangebb1eae9b..ba7a1573c).Validated, high-signal issues found and fixed:
ndarray/base/reinterpret-complex— Fix heading inlib/node_modules/@stdlib/ndarray/base/reinterpret-complex/README.md(introduced in 2eb9120): changed# reinterpretto# reinterpretComplexto match the convention used by sibling packages (reinterpret-complex128,reinterpret-complex64,reinterpret-boolean).docs/talks.md— In 59a6ae8 (docs/talks.md), the HPSF Conference 2026<img>tag had an emptysrc, leaving the thumbnail broken despite the PNG being committed alongside it; patched to use the jsDelivr CDN URL pinned to that commit, consistent with every other entry in the file.Related Issues
No.
Questions
No.
Other
Validation
Audited every commit merged to
developin the last 24 hours via four parallel reviewers (two stdlib-style passes, two correctness passes). Each reviewer's findings were cross-checked against the diff before being accepted.Checked:
dcartesian-squareforscartesian-square;reinterpret-complex128/reinterpret-complex64/reinterpret-booleanforreinterpret-complex).Deliberately excluded:
node/→n/ESLint plugin rename (all listed on the reviewers' guard list).One class of false positive was filtered out and is worth recording: two reviewers flagged the
@exampleoutputs inndarray/base/reinterpret-complex(README,lib/main.js,docs/types/index.d.ts) as wrong, claimingzeroTo([2,2], { dtype: 'complex128' })should produce sequential0,1,2,3across the whole ndarray. By defaultzeroTofills along the last dimension only (dims: [-1]), so the duplicated-row output as documented is correct.Checklist
AI Assistance
If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?
Disclosure
This PR was authored by Claude Code as part of a routine cross-commit review of the last 24 hours of merges to
develop. Each fix was independently re-verified by re-reading the originating diff and the relevant style convention before being applied.@stdlib-js/reviewers
Generated by Claude Code