Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients from 3.0.0 to 3.4.0 - #1725

Closed
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-ff3b0870f735ce1390b30bd62a14034b
Closed

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients from 3.0.0 to 3.4.0#1725
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-ff3b0870f735ce1390b30bd62a14034b

Conversation

@snyk-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `maven` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • kafka-3-0/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 566/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-JAVA-ORGAPACHEKAFKA-3317161
org.apache.kafka:kafka-clients:
3.0.0 -> 3.4.0
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Deserialization of Untrusted Data

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@snyk-bot:Thanks for your contribution. For this PR, do we need to update docs?
(The PR template contains info about doc, which helps others know more about the changes. Can you provide doc-related info in this and future PR descriptions? Thanks)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the doc-info-missing This pr needs to mark a document option in description label Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

doc-info-missing This pr needs to mark a document option in description

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants