Skip to content

update check for turning off sloppy coercion when body request is application/json - #266

Closed
ebourmalo wants to merge 2 commits into
strongloop:masterfrom
PayFit:fix/bodySloppyCoercion
Closed

update check for turning off sloppy coercion when body request is application/json#266
ebourmalo wants to merge 2 commits into
strongloop:masterfrom
PayFit:fix/bodySloppyCoercion

Conversation

@ebourmalo

@ebourmalo ebourmalo commented Dec 15, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check and fix if the content-type header is an application/json request type.
Allow now the charset definition in the content-type (i.e 'application/json;charset=UTF-8').

Connect to #267

Check if the content-type request header in an application/json type.
Allow now the charset definition (i.e 'application/json;charset=UTF-8')
@slnode

slnode commented Dec 15, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch? To accept patch and trigger a build add comment ".ok\W+to\W+test."

@ebourmalo ebourmalo changed the title update check for turning off sloppy coercion update check for turning off sloppy coercion when body request is application/json Dec 15, 2015
@ghislainf

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👍

@rmg

rmg commented Dec 16, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@slnode ok to test

@bajtos bajtos self-assigned this May 9, 2016
@bajtos

bajtos commented May 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hello @ebourmalo, sorry for taking so long to respond. Could you please rebase your patch on top of the current master and add a unit-test to demonstrate your code works as intended and prevent regressions in the future?

@slnode

slnode commented May 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch? To accept patch and trigger a build add comment ".ok\W+to\W+test."

@bajtos

bajtos commented May 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@slnode ok to test

@bajtos bajtos added the bug label Sep 6, 2016
@bajtos bajtos added this to the #Epic: Coercion Cleanup milestone Sep 6, 2016
@slnode

slnode commented Sep 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

2 similar comments
@slnode

slnode commented Sep 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@slnode

slnode commented Sep 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@bajtos

bajtos commented Sep 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing in favour of #350

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants