fix: Incorrect contract path in "Go to definition" reply from copy/paste error#1865
Merged
jbencin merged 1 commit intostx-labs:mainfrom Jun 18, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Currently goto definition for
contract-call?is broken. It takes you to the correct line/column, but always in the current file, not where it is actually defined. I broke this in #1859 due to copy/pasting the first instance ofuri: contract_location.try_into().ok()?. The following ones should use a different variable (definition_contract_location)