Manual polyfill pdfjs worker#105
Merged
Merged
Conversation
harbournick
force-pushed
the
nick/manual-polyfill-pdfjs-worker
branch
from
October 2, 2024 17:57
8ddd65b to
7e77422
Compare
harbournick
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 2, 2024 18:07
harbournick
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
* Fix pdfjs worker manually * Bump to alpha 64
superdoc-bot Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2026
…3451) (#105) Note: this ports only the public subtree changes from a mixed source commit (65 public paths, 4 non-public paths ignored). Ported-From-Source-Repo: superdoc/orbit Ported-From-Source-Commit: 78c46065d3a6d7009f4cbdb79a96dd91df48b848 Ported-Public-Prefix: superdoc/public
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.