Skip to content

Update sbt-scalajs, scalajs-compiler, ... to 1.9.0 - #4132

Closed
scala-steward wants to merge 7 commits into
typelevel:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-scalajs-1.9.0
Closed

Update sbt-scalajs, scalajs-compiler, ... to 1.9.0#4132
scala-steward wants to merge 7 commits into
typelevel:mainfrom
scala-steward:update/sbt-scalajs-1.9.0

Conversation

@scala-steward

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates

from 1.7.1 to 1.9.0.
GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scala-js" } ]

labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, commit-count:1

@armanbilge armanbilge left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I proposed the following update scheme for SJS in typelevel/cats-effect#2710 (review):

a good rule of thumb might be to tie the SJS version to our current Scala 3 version. E.g. Scala 3.0 requires SJS 1.5+, Scala 3.1 requires SJS 1.7+, and we'll see what is needed in Scala 3.2.

@satorg

satorg commented Feb 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I wonder if it is possible to configure @scala-steward somehow to keep its updates for SJS being aligned with Scala3...

@armanbilge armanbilge closed this Mar 24, 2022
@scala-steward
scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-scalajs-1.9.0 branch March 25, 2022 04:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants