feat!: cosmwasm an optional integration to app

[gsk967]

Description

added cosmwasm feature as an optional features for app

// to build cosmwasm feature into app 
$ EXPERIMENTAL=true make build

closes: #802

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• added appropriate labels to the PR
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1547 (7e4405d) into main (2791f00) will decrease coverage by 0.19%.
The diff coverage is 3.70%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1547      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.79%   51.59%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        6897     6923      +26     
==========================================
  Hits         3572     3572              
- Misses       3056     3081      +25     
- Partials      269      270       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
ante/ante.go	32.14% <3.70%> (-27.86%)	⬇️

[robert-zaremba]

Left few comments.
Also, have an idea how to better integrate the experimental build without doing so many custom functions. I will make a commit with an example directly in your repo, let me know what do you think.

[robert-zaremba]

See this commit as an alternative idea to reduce copied functions: 009f87d
What do you think?

[gsk967]

See this commit as an alternative idea to reduce copied functions: 009f87d What do you think?

I think it is better to keep old functions only, because we already passing one build flag for experimental config , so no need for new flag again.
We will keep experimental features everything into experimenatal_appconfig only.

[robert-zaremba]

I think it is better to keep old functions only, because we already passing one build flag for experimental config , so no need for new flag again.

There is no need for a new flag. Where did you get an impression that we need a new flag?

We will keep experimental features everything into experimenatal_appconfig only.

On the other hand, the code is a bit more bloated. So my idea was to use both: "if else" when the change is small, and function in other places. Especially the maccPerms looks much cleaner with the "if else" approach.

[gsk967]

@robert-zaremba Please can you review again

[robert-zaremba]

Looks good, let's solve the remaining comments.