Skip to content

Auto-inject workflow run/step ID VQS headers from queue payload#1098

Merged
pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pg/auto-inject-vqs-run-id-header
Feb 17, 2026
Merged

Auto-inject workflow run/step ID VQS headers from queue payload#1098
pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pg/auto-inject-vqs-run-id-header

Conversation

@pranaygp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Moves x-workflow-run-id and x-workflow-step-id header injection into world-vercel queue implementation (getHeadersFromPayload) so headers are automatically derived from the queue payload
  • Removes manual x-workflow-run-id header passing from all callers in @workflow/core (step-handler, suspension-handler)
  • Also covers the sleep re-enqueue path inside createQueueHandler which was previously missing the header entirely

Test plan

  • Verify pnpm typecheck passes (pre-existing web-shared failure is unrelated)
  • Verify pnpm build passes for @workflow/core and @workflow/world-vercel
  • Run e2e tests to confirm VQS messages still carry correct headers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Move `x-workflow-run-id` and `x-workflow-step-id` header injection into
`world-vercel` queue implementation so callers don't need to set them
manually. The headers are extracted from the queue payload itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp pranaygp requested review from Copilot and ctgowrie February 17, 2026 21:33
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 79da8ab

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 15 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 534 0 38 572
✅ 💻 Local Development 556 0 68 624
✅ 📦 Local Production 556 0 68 624
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 556 0 68 624
✅ 🪟 Windows 49 0 3 52
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 111 45 9 165
✅ 📋 Other 135 0 21 156
Total 2497 45 275 2817

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (45 failed)

turso (45 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow
  • addTenWorkflow
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow
  • promiseRaceWorkflow
  • promiseAnyWorkflow
  • hookWorkflow
  • webhookWorkflow
  • sleepingWorkflow
  • parallelSleepWorkflow
  • nullByteWorkflow
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow
  • fetchWorkflow
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling retry behavior workflow completes despite transient 5xx on step_completed
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars)
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply()
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 48 0 4
✅ example 48 0 4
✅ express 48 0 4
✅ fastify 48 0 4
✅ hono 48 0 4
✅ nextjs-turbopack 51 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack 51 0 1
✅ nitro 48 0 4
✅ nuxt 48 0 4
✅ sveltekit 48 0 4
✅ vite 48 0 4
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 45 0 7
✅ express-stable 45 0 7
✅ fastify-stable 45 0 7
✅ hono-stable 45 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 49 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 49 0 3
✅ nitro-stable 45 0 7
✅ nuxt-stable 45 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable 45 0 7
✅ vite-stable 45 0 7
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 49 0 3
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 3 0 0
✅ mongodb 49 0 3
✅ redis-dev 3 0 0
✅ redis 49 0 3
✅ turso-dev 3 0 0
❌ turso 4 45 3
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 45 0 7
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 45 0 7

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.032s (-3.0%) 1.004s (~) 0.973s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.032s (+26.7% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.973s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.040s 1.005s 0.965s 10 1.26x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.048s 1.005s 0.956s 10 1.52x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.121s (-59.7% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.889s 10 3.80x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.131s 1.007s 0.876s 10 4.11x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.265s (+25.8% 🔺) 1.014s (~) 0.749s 10 8.32x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.554s (-14.1% 🟢) 1.744s (-10.4% 🟢) 1.190s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 0.614s (+5.1% 🔺) 1.969s (+0.5%) 1.356s 10 1.11x
▲ Vercel Express 0.648s (+22.4% 🔺) 2.111s (+24.8% 🔺) 1.463s 10 1.17x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.098s 2.005s 0.907s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.105s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.899s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.107s (+3.0%) 2.006s (~) 0.899s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.110s 2.006s 0.896s 10 1.01x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 1.294s 2.008s 0.713s 10 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.427s (~) 3.014s (~) 0.587s 10 2.21x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.445s (+6.0% 🔺) 3.014s (+7.1% 🔺) 0.569s 10 2.23x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.246s (-3.9%) 3.229s (-1.8%) 0.983s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.372s (+1.3%) 3.065s (-13.7% 🟢) 0.693s 10 1.06x
▲ Vercel Express 3.748s (+37.3% 🔺) 4.839s (+37.3% 🔺) 1.091s 10 1.67x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.710s 11.022s 0.312s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.731s 11.023s 0.292s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 10.821s (+2.6%) 11.022s (~) 0.201s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 10.822s (~) 11.021s (~) 0.200s 3 1.01x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 12.185s 13.017s 0.832s 3 1.14x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 20.279s (~) 21.057s (~) 0.778s 2 1.89x
🐘 Postgres Express 20.392s (+33.6% 🔺) 21.058s (+31.2% 🔺) 0.666s 2 1.90x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 17.835s (-2.1%) 19.388s (+1.7%) 1.553s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 17.993s (-2.5%) 18.712s (-3.8%) 0.719s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 18.214s (+3.3%) 19.362s (+3.6%) 1.148s 2 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 26.929s 27.051s 0.122s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 27.222s 28.051s 0.828s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express 27.486s (+2.4%) 28.051s (+3.7%) 0.565s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 27.489s (~) 28.052s (~) 0.562s 3 1.02x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 30.358s 31.033s 0.674s 2 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 41.331s (-17.4% 🟢) 42.101s (-16.8% 🟢) 0.770s 2 1.53x
🐘 Postgres Express 50.219s (+32.8% 🔺) 51.138s (+34.2% 🔺) 0.919s 2 1.86x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 44.157s (~) 45.300s (+0.7%) 1.144s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 44.318s (+1.7%) 46.362s (+3.7%) 2.045s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 44.898s (~) 45.756s (~) 0.858s 2 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 54.410s 55.101s 0.691s 2 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 56.748s 57.099s 0.351s 2 1.04x
💻 Local Express 57.352s (+2.9%) 58.101s (+3.6%) 0.749s 2 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 57.379s (~) 58.103s (~) 0.724s 2 1.05x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 60.727s 61.062s 0.335s 2 1.12x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 75.234s (-22.6% 🟢) 75.672s (-22.2% 🟢) 0.439s 2 1.38x
🐘 Postgres Express 100.430s (+33.1% 🔺) 101.244s (+32.9% 🔺) 0.814s 1 1.85x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 89.556s (-0.9%) 90.384s (-0.8%) 0.828s 1 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 90.945s (+1.2%) 91.495s (~) 0.550s 1 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 92.851s (+2.6%) 93.413s (+2.1%) 0.562s 1 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.252s 2.006s 0.755s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.387s 2.006s 0.619s 15 1.11x
💻 Local Express 1.415s (+3.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.590s 15 1.13x
💻 Local Nitro 1.428s (+1.1%) 2.005s (~) 0.578s 15 1.14x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.931s (-17.1% 🟢) 2.513s (-16.7% 🟢) 0.582s 12 1.54x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.150s 3.008s 0.857s 10 1.72x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.468s (+4.8%) 3.014s (~) 0.546s 10 1.97x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.717s (+5.0% 🔺) 3.514s (+1.1%) 0.798s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.757s (+16.5% 🔺) 3.852s (+26.7% 🔺) 1.095s 8 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.859s (+10.6% 🔺) 3.833s (+6.6% 🔺) 0.974s 8 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.519s 3.008s 0.489s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.563s (+9.3% 🔺) 3.007s (~) 0.444s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 2.594s (~) 3.007s (~) 0.414s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.619s 3.007s 0.389s 10 1.04x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.743s 5.176s 0.434s 6 1.88x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 8.268s (-1.2%) 8.784s (~) 0.516s 4 3.28x
🐘 Postgres Express 8.680s (-15.0% 🟢) 9.284s (-13.3% 🟢) 0.604s 4 3.45x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.801s (-9.2% 🟢) 4.542s (+14.5% 🔺) 1.742s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.346s (-3.9%) 4.388s (-2.1%) 1.042s 7 1.19x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.486s (+30.0% 🔺) 4.472s (+24.7% 🔺) 0.986s 7 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.105s 4.868s 0.763s 7 1.00x
💻 Local Express 7.460s (+17.8% 🔺) 8.019s (+14.3% 🔺) 0.559s 4 1.82x
💻 Local Nitro 7.495s (+3.0%) 8.019s (~) 0.524s 4 1.83x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.577s 8.268s 0.691s 4 1.85x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 9.942s 10.348s 0.407s 3 2.42x
🐘 Postgres Express 50.703s (+1.7%) 51.128s (+1.9%) 0.425s 1 12.35x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 50.800s (+16.8% 🔺) 51.127s (+15.9% 🔺) 0.327s 1 12.38x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.201s (-56.7% 🟢) 4.134s (-50.7% 🟢) 0.933s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.237s (-52.1% 🟢) 4.289s (-46.3% 🟢) 1.052s 7 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.291s (-37.0% 🟢) 4.449s (-32.7% 🟢) 1.158s 7 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.246s 2.006s 0.760s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.420s 2.004s 0.584s 15 1.14x
💻 Local Express 1.424s (+1.5%) 2.005s (~) 0.581s 15 1.14x
💻 Local Nitro 1.442s (+2.8%) 2.006s (~) 0.564s 15 1.16x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 2.178s 3.007s 0.830s 10 1.75x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.207s (-2.0%) 2.740s (+2.2%) 0.533s 11 1.77x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.231s (+7.8% 🔺) 2.678s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.447s 12 1.79x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.272s (-26.7% 🟢) 3.280s (-17.9% 🟢) 1.008s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.334s (-6.5% 🟢) 3.001s (-13.2% 🟢) 0.666s 10 1.03x
▲ Vercel Express 2.350s (-17.4% 🟢) 3.334s (-8.2% 🟢) 0.984s 9 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.513s 3.008s 0.495s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.609s 3.008s 0.399s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Express 2.703s (+8.4% 🔺) 3.007s (~) 0.303s 10 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 2.760s (+2.4%) 3.008s (~) 0.248s 10 1.10x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 4.625s 5.177s 0.553s 6 1.84x
🐘 Postgres Express 11.136s (-7.1% 🟢) 11.705s (-7.8% 🟢) 0.570s 3 4.43x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 11.718s (+24.0% 🔺) 12.039s (+20.0% 🔺) 0.321s 3 4.66x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.530s (-6.1% 🟢) 3.497s (-0.8%) 0.968s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.557s (-4.2%) 3.072s (-13.7% 🟢) 0.515s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Express 2.842s (+20.1% 🔺) 3.881s (+27.2% 🔺) 1.039s 8 1.12x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.091s 5.011s 0.920s 6 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 7.780s (-1.5%) 8.519s (+3.0%) 0.739s 4 1.90x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.942s 8.265s 0.324s 4 1.94x
💻 Local Express 8.044s (+12.4% 🔺) 8.521s (+6.2% 🔺) 0.477s 4 1.97x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 9.807s 10.346s 0.540s 3 2.40x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 48.993s (-0.9%) 49.105s (-2.0%) 0.112s 1 11.98x
🐘 Postgres Express 51.450s (+4.2%) 52.120s (+4.0%) 0.670s 1 12.58x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.915s (-5.5% 🟢) 3.773s (~) 0.859s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.048s (+9.8% 🔺) 3.957s (-14.9% 🟢) 0.909s 8 1.05x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.707s (+12.0% 🔺) 4.858s (+8.6% 🔺) 1.151s 7 1.27x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.143s 1.001s 0.012s 1.017s 0.874s 10 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.156s 0.999s 0.001s 1.007s 0.851s 10 1.09x
💻 Local Nitro 0.171s (-1.7%) 1.002s (~) 0.011s (~) 1.016s (~) 0.846s 10 1.19x
💻 Local Express 0.174s (+48.8% 🔺) 1.002s (~) 0.011s (+12.7% 🔺) 1.017s (~) 0.842s 10 1.22x
🌐 MongoDB Next.js (Turbopack) 0.528s 0.916s 0.001s 1.008s 0.480s 10 3.69x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.250s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.790s (+4.7%) 0.002s (+23.1% 🔺) 2.014s (~) 0.763s 10 8.74x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.326s (+85.0% 🔺) 2.717s (+52.0% 🔺) 0.001s (~) 3.015s (+49.6% 🔺) 0.689s 10 16.26x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.057s (+0.6%) 2.703s (+0.7%) 0.528s (+197.9% 🔺) 3.815s (+11.8% 🔺) 1.758s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.058s (~) 2.755s (+15.9% 🔺) 0.199s (-2.2%) 3.563s (+15.8% 🔺) 1.505s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.099s (~) 2.504s (-7.9% 🟢) 0.866s (+381.8% 🔺) 3.887s (+12.9% 🔺) 1.788s 10 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8/12
🐘 Postgres Nitro 8/12
▲ Vercel Express 5/12
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 💻 Local 10/12
Next.js (Turbopack) 🌐 Redis 7/12
Nitro 💻 Local 9/12
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@pranaygp pranaygp requested a review from a team February 17, 2026 21:35
@pranaygp pranaygp enabled auto-merge (squash) February 17, 2026 21:38
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR centralizes injection of Vercel Queue (VQS) observability headers (x-workflow-run-id, x-workflow-step-id) inside @workflow/world-vercel by deriving them from the queued payload, and removes manual header passing from @workflow/core callers.

Changes:

  • Add payload-derived VQS header injection in packages/world-vercel/src/queue.ts and merge with any caller-provided headers.
  • Remove manual x-workflow-run-id header passing from suspension-handler and step-handler queueing paths.
  • Add a changeset bumping @workflow/world-vercel and @workflow/core as patch releases.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
packages/world-vercel/src/queue.ts Derive and inject run/step ID headers from QueuePayload during Client.send() calls.
packages/core/src/runtime/suspension-handler.ts Stop manually injecting x-workflow-run-id when queueing step execution messages.
packages/core/src/runtime/step-handler.ts Stop manually injecting x-workflow-run-id when re-queueing workflow invocations.
.changeset/auto-vqs-run-id-header.md Record patch release notes for the header injection behavior change.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +62 to +63
}
if ('workflowRunId' in payload && typeof payload.workflowRunId === 'string') {
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

getHeadersFromPayload can set x-workflow-run-id twice (from runId and workflowRunId), with the latter overwriting the former. Because QueuePayloadSchema is a union of non-strict objects (unknown keys are stripped), a payload object containing both keys can be encoded/parsed as a workflow payload with only runId, while the header ends up reflecting workflowRunId, creating an observability mismatch. Consider deriving headers from the same sanitized/encoded payload you actually send (or explicitly choosing precedence with if/else if, and potentially warning when both are present).

Suggested change
}
if ('workflowRunId' in payload && typeof payload.workflowRunId === 'string') {
} else if (
'workflowRunId' in payload &&
typeof payload.workflowRunId === 'string'
) {

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 136 to +142
{
idempotencyKey: opts?.idempotencyKey,
delaySeconds: opts?.delaySeconds,
headers: opts?.headers,
headers: {
...getHeadersFromPayload(payload),
...opts?.headers,
},
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New behavior auto-injects VQS headers from the payload, but there’s no test assertion covering that Client.send receives the expected x-workflow-run-id / x-workflow-step-id headers (including the delayed re-enqueue path and merge behavior with opts.headers). Adding a focused unit test in packages/world-vercel/src/queue.test.ts would prevent regressions.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@pranaygp pranaygp merged commit 7046610 into main Feb 17, 2026
106 checks passed
@pranaygp pranaygp deleted the pg/auto-inject-vqs-run-id-header branch February 17, 2026 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants