Skip to content

fix(next): resolve bare specifiers in copied step files for lazy discovery#1670

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/next-lazy-discovery-bare-specifiers
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(next): resolve bare specifiers in copied step files for lazy discovery#1670
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/next-lazy-discovery-bare-specifiers

Conversation

@TooTallNate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Use enhanced-resolve with ESM conditions (node, import) to resolve bare specifiers from the original source file's location when copying step files for lazy discovery
  • Only rewrite specifiers that can't be resolved from the app directory (transitive SDK deps like @workflow/serde), leaving direct deps (like workflow) as bare specifiers
  • Add enhanced-resolve to the pnpm catalog and use catalog: in both @workflow/builders and @workflow/next

…overy

When the deferred builder copies step files to __workflow_step_files__/,
bare specifiers that are transitive SDK deps can't resolve from the app
directory. Use enhanced-resolve with ESM conditions (preferring 'import'
over 'require') to resolve from the original source location, only when
the specifier can't be resolved from the app directory.

Also add enhanced-resolve to the pnpm catalog and use catalog: in both
@workflow/builders and @workflow/next.
@TooTallNate TooTallNate requested review from a team and ijjk as code owners April 9, 2026 17:43
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 9, 2026 17:43
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 94cddab

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/ai Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 890 0 67 957
✅ 💻 Local Development 866 0 178 1044
✅ 📦 Local Production 866 0 178 1044
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 866 0 178 1044
✅ 🪟 Windows 79 0 8 87
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 136 65 24 225
✅ 📋 Other 219 0 42 261
Total 3922 65 675 4662

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (65 failed)

mongodb (4 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNSSMWEAYMG5DWWJSFK4Q44X
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSN58M98B21G252MEXECV9
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNSSX1NPNG3867FMH4DPTC9E
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNST3H45GZ7YSK992AV8VE84

redis (3 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNSSMWEAYMG5DWWJSFK4Q44X
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNSSX1NPNG3867FMH4DPTC9E
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNST3H45GZ7YSK992AV8VE84

turso (58 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSKJV0ESAZH5QPY0D4YNKF
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSKJV0ESAZH5QPY0D4YNKF
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNSSNNAMRG1F2XCGWWX3Y572
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSKSZG84N0DMV787K7EVZ2
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSM0SFBKKJJQAFYBYB0TCS
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSM48KG08VFBGZ4N1G9NDB
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSP09RRW5B201AK7VYZQJZ
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSMG63C0J9FSH20RZGAZH2
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNSSMWEAYMG5DWWJSFK4Q44X
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSN58M98B21G252MEXECV9
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSNBZ0D9AXYP947SPGM7PW
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSNRS3R27TMPGXH7SJQF1W
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSNW34W0097DF3HXRG6MTM
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSNY7PRXNFXWSVATTVSSV3
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSRMFZXN9C5BTTF41KQNSY
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNSSRS1DF10H1319CD1SDCTR
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNSSWD1EYDYY3S6RT1MA1RK2
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNSSX1NPNG3867FMH4DPTC9E
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNSSXQB7P4N07VP2JTZQ4JQT
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNSSYB60MQP8VWFF60140QRV
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNSSYMETGXGF9385S1F7FSFM
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNSSYSYNMG12VJJYSNM7JW4K
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNSSYW9ZFKZPAW4SF37RS2A6
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNSSZBXMRSX71PWFK51ZNEST
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNSSZJMYCFH4PK6HPTHHZA9D
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNSSZSDW92CEN1MT1EDJ1HES
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNST008ECHED5CQ8F1PYGH26
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNST06ZA9860S39G2YMZ778A
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNST0DT201PC0XNS9D8YQHY9
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNST0N139FBBC1X2D3SEC02D
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNST10CRXWNKYYJTRGZ421QF
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNST18AFHTX57FP143GMT3VA
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNST1F637TMJ803D6RYEEH4R
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNST1RJVXX48NP4GR8GDX8HG
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNST24REFZGBN55Q5VJCYWJR
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNST2V96XHEKT0WZAPY92JT9
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNST35TAW5V7J0NZD685JYFH
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNST3CR3ETP19P25X2JSSH7A
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNST3EZ2FAKACK18RBB7Z46C
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNST3H45GZ7YSK992AV8VE84
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNST3KZM7PG5G27JCY3NZT91

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 80 0 7
✅ example 80 0 7
✅ express 80 0 7
✅ fastify 80 0 7
✅ hono 80 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 85 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 85 0 2
✅ nitro 80 0 7
✅ nuxt 80 0 7
✅ sveltekit 80 0 7
✅ vite 80 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 73 0 14
✅ express-stable 73 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 73 0 14
✅ hono-stable 73 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 73 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 73 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 73 0 14
✅ vite-stable 73 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 73 0 14
✅ express-stable 73 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 73 0 14
✅ hono-stable 73 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 73 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 73 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 73 0 14
✅ vite-stable 73 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 73 0 14
✅ express-stable 73 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 73 0 14
✅ hono-stable 73 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 62 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 79 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 73 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 73 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 73 0 14
✅ vite-stable 73 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 79 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 5 0 0
❌ mongodb 58 4 8
✅ redis-dev 5 0 0
❌ redis 59 3 8
✅ turso-dev 5 0 0
❌ turso 4 58 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 73 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 73 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 73 0 14

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.041s (-3.7%) 1.005s (~) 0.963s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.043s (+15.4% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.962s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.052s 1.006s 0.954s 10 1.25x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.054s 1.005s 0.951s 10 1.30x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.058s 1.011s 0.953s 10 1.40x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.059s (-10.3% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.951s 10 1.44x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.060s (-4.6%) 1.010s (~) 0.950s 10 1.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 0.227s (-19.8% 🟢) 2.288s (-7.8% 🟢) 2.061s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.327s (-26.4% 🟢) 2.494s (+12.2% 🔺) 2.167s 10 1.44x
▲ Vercel Express 0.332s (+37.3% 🔺) 2.186s (+2.9%) 1.854s 10 1.47x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.121s 2.006s 0.886s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.125s (+2.1%) 2.005s (~) 0.880s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.129s (~) 2.006s (~) 0.877s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.137s 2.009s 0.872s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.144s (-0.6%) 2.010s (~) 0.866s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.144s 2.007s 0.862s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.152s (+0.5%) 2.010s (~) 0.859s 10 1.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.898s (-9.4% 🟢) 3.603s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.705s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.905s (-8.0% 🟢) 3.719s (+0.7%) 1.814s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.938s (+3.6%) 3.578s (-6.9% 🟢) 1.640s 10 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.757s 11.023s 0.266s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.843s 11.023s 0.180s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 10.928s (+2.4%) 11.023s (~) 0.094s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.935s (~) 11.024s (~) 0.089s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.947s 11.017s 0.070s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.956s (+0.9%) 11.026s (~) 0.069s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.972s (+0.9%) 11.354s (+3.0%) 0.382s 3 1.02x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 16.793s (~) 19.239s (+1.4%) 2.446s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 17.082s (-3.9%) 18.640s (-1.7%) 1.557s 2 1.02x
▲ Vercel Express 17.462s (+4.3%) 19.862s (+6.1% 🔺) 2.401s 2 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 14.240s 15.028s 0.788s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.542s 15.020s 0.478s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.608s (~) 15.022s (~) 0.414s 4 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.655s (+1.1%) 15.026s (~) 0.371s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.765s 15.030s 0.266s 4 1.04x
💻 Local Express 14.999s (~) 15.279s (-4.7%) 0.279s 4 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 15.021s (+5.6% 🔺) 15.280s (+1.7%) 0.259s 4 1.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 32.276s (+2.7%) 34.188s (+1.7%) 1.912s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 33.979s (~) 36.235s (+0.8%) 2.256s 2 1.05x
▲ Vercel Express 34.165s (+13.3% 🔺) 35.843s (+11.2% 🔺) 1.678s 2 1.06x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 13.427s 14.026s 0.599s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 13.954s 14.163s 0.209s 7 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.032s (~) 14.594s (-1.0%) 0.563s 7 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.249s (+2.8%) 15.023s (+7.2% 🔺) 0.773s 6 1.06x
💻 Local Express 16.476s (-2.7%) 17.032s (~) 0.556s 6 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 16.695s (+11.9% 🔺) 17.031s (+13.3% 🔺) 0.335s 6 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 16.813s 17.199s 0.386s 6 1.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 54.773s (+4.2%) 57.676s (+5.3% 🔺) 2.903s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 57.519s (+6.6% 🔺) 59.211s (+5.9% 🔺) 1.692s 2 1.05x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 57.775s (+5.6% 🔺) 59.709s (+4.7%) 1.934s 2 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.240s 2.009s 0.769s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.266s (-0.5%) 2.010s (~) 0.744s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.274s (+0.6%) 2.009s (~) 0.735s 15 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.358s 2.006s 0.648s 15 1.09x
💻 Local Express 1.504s (-1.6%) 2.006s (~) 0.502s 15 1.21x
💻 Local Nitro 1.538s (+2.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.468s 15 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.552s 2.006s 0.453s 15 1.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.182s (-12.5% 🟢) 3.811s (-3.3%) 1.629s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.347s (-1.2%) 3.851s (~) 1.503s 8 1.08x
▲ Vercel Express 2.537s (+6.9% 🔺) 4.173s (+1.0%) 1.636s 8 1.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.334s (~) 3.009s (~) 0.674s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.357s (~) 3.011s (~) 0.654s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.397s 3.009s 0.613s 10 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.524s 3.008s 0.485s 10 1.08x
💻 Local Express 2.850s (-10.5% 🟢) 3.342s (-16.7% 🟢) 0.492s 9 1.22x
💻 Local Nitro 2.906s (+6.5% 🔺) 3.108s (-3.1%) 0.202s 10 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.294s 3.886s 0.592s 8 1.41x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.760s (+4.2%) 4.055s (-1.1%) 1.295s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.772s (-9.7% 🟢) 4.084s (-9.4% 🟢) 1.311s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.185s (+5.3% 🔺) 4.732s (+7.4% 🔺) 1.547s 7 1.15x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.445s (-1.7%) 4.010s (~) 0.565s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.503s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.507s 8 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.662s 4.012s 0.349s 8 1.06x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.118s 5.011s 0.893s 6 1.20x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.276s 7.766s 0.490s 4 2.11x
💻 Local Express 7.919s (-5.1% 🟢) 8.517s (-5.6% 🟢) 0.598s 4 2.30x
💻 Local Nitro 8.409s (+8.6% 🔺) 9.021s (+5.9% 🔺) 0.612s 4 2.44x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.043s (+3.2%) 4.619s (-2.0%) 1.576s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.314s (+10.3% 🔺) 5.379s (+15.2% 🔺) 2.065s 6 1.09x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.005s (+31.9% 🔺) 5.834s (+26.6% 🔺) 1.829s 6 1.32x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.231s 2.010s 0.779s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.261s (~) 2.008s (~) 0.747s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.264s (-2.4%) 2.009s (~) 0.744s 15 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.309s 2.006s 0.697s 15 1.06x
💻 Local Express 1.519s (-2.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.486s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 1.534s (+1.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.472s 15 1.25x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.545s 2.006s 0.462s 15 1.25x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.124s (-2.0%) 3.971s (+10.9% 🔺) 1.847s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.480s (+28.8% 🔺) 4.151s (+11.8% 🔺) 1.671s 8 1.17x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.578s (+32.0% 🔺) 4.147s (+8.8% 🔺) 1.569s 8 1.21x

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.344s (-1.5%) 3.011s (~) 0.667s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.411s 3.009s 0.598s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.415s (+3.4%) 3.011s (~) 0.595s 10 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.564s 3.008s 0.443s 10 1.09x
💻 Local Express 2.879s (-9.2% 🟢) 3.453s (-11.1% 🟢) 0.575s 9 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 2.965s (-15.2% 🟢) 3.565s (-11.2% 🟢) 0.600s 9 1.26x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.971s 3.676s 0.705s 9 1.27x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.573s (-1.8%) 4.295s (-2.7%) 1.722s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.616s (~) 4.135s (-3.1%) 1.518s 8 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.607s (+45.4% 🔺) 5.212s (+34.7% 🔺) 1.605s 6 1.40x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.481s (~) 4.008s (~) 0.527s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.500s (+0.9%) 4.009s (~) 0.509s 8 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.667s 4.011s 0.344s 8 1.05x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.066s 4.581s 0.515s 7 1.17x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.564s 8.021s 0.457s 4 2.17x
💻 Local Express 8.186s (-19.9% 🟢) 9.023s (-18.2% 🟢) 0.837s 4 2.35x
💻 Local Nitro 9.115s (+7.2% 🔺) 9.525s (+5.6% 🔺) 0.410s 4 2.62x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.162s (+41.9% 🔺) 6.014s (+42.7% 🔺) 1.852s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.202s (+21.3% 🔺) 6.084s (+26.3% 🔺) 1.882s 5 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro 4.624s (+78.5% 🔺) 6.034s (+40.5% 🔺) 1.410s 5 1.11x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.695s 1.004s 0.309s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.764s 1.006s 0.242s 60 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.824s (-4.6%) 1.022s (+1.5%) 0.198s 59 1.19x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.883s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.023s (~) 0.141s 59 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.923s 1.058s 0.135s 57 1.33x
💻 Local Nitro 0.990s (+34.3% 🔺) 1.309s (+30.4% 🔺) 0.320s 46 1.42x
💻 Local Express 1.031s (+1.7%) 1.912s (+12.4% 🔺) 0.880s 32 1.48x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 9.515s (+3.5%) 11.712s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.197s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 9.834s (+10.0% 🔺) 11.976s (+12.3% 🔺) 2.142s 6 1.03x
▲ Vercel Nitro 10.992s (+28.3% 🔺) 12.709s (+24.5% 🔺) 1.717s 5 1.16x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.690s 2.006s 0.316s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.910s 2.174s 0.263s 42 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.954s (-9.4% 🟢) 2.203s (-26.0% 🟢) 0.249s 41 1.16x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.137s (+9.9% 🔺) 2.884s (+37.3% 🔺) 0.747s 32 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 3.007s (+17.1% 🔺) 3.586s (+12.7% 🔺) 0.578s 26 1.78x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.011s 3.380s 0.369s 27 1.78x
💻 Local Express 3.051s (-1.3%) 3.884s (-3.1%) 0.833s 24 1.81x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 31.344s (+6.5% 🔺) 33.301s (+5.7% 🔺) 1.957s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 31.574s (+10.3% 🔺) 33.139s (+9.2% 🔺) 1.565s 3 1.01x
▲ Vercel Express 32.014s (+14.4% 🔺) 34.305s (+14.6% 🔺) 2.291s 3 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.447s 4.008s 0.561s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.805s 4.010s 0.205s 30 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.018s (-6.9% 🟢) 4.491s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.473s 27 1.17x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 4.291s (+7.5% 🔺) 5.012s (+16.6% 🔺) 0.720s 24 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.513s 9.017s 0.503s 14 2.47x
💻 Local Express 8.963s (-2.7%) 9.324s (-6.9% 🟢) 0.362s 13 2.60x
💻 Local Nitro 9.154s (+18.7% 🔺) 9.787s (+19.1% 🔺) 0.633s 13 2.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 76.398s (-2.6%) 78.394s (-2.3%) 1.996s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 77.312s (+7.9% 🔺) 79.504s (+6.8% 🔺) 2.192s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 82.489s (+7.2% 🔺) 84.529s (+7.3% 🔺) 2.040s 2 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.254s 1.007s 0.753s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.280s (-5.3% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.726s 60 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.284s (+0.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.722s 60 1.12x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.296s 1.004s 0.708s 60 1.16x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.589s 1.005s 0.416s 60 2.32x
💻 Local Express 0.602s (+0.9%) 1.004s (-1.7%) 0.403s 60 2.37x
💻 Local Nitro 0.620s (-6.5% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.384s 60 2.44x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.575s (-42.3% 🟢) 3.171s (-28.7% 🟢) 1.597s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.580s (+9.0% 🔺) 3.348s (+11.3% 🔺) 1.768s 18 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.765s (+16.0% 🔺) 3.538s (+14.2% 🔺) 1.772s 17 1.12x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.479s 1.006s 0.527s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.492s (-6.4% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.515s 90 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.502s (+2.8%) 1.007s (~) 0.504s 90 1.05x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.136s 2.006s 0.869s 45 2.37x
💻 Local Express 2.419s (-3.6%) 3.009s (~) 0.590s 30 5.05x
💻 Local Nitro 2.530s (-7.9% 🟢) 3.009s (-5.5% 🟢) 0.479s 30 5.29x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.711s 3.296s 0.585s 28 5.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.741s (+10.9% 🔺) 4.365s (+5.4% 🔺) 1.624s 21 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.761s (+0.8%) 4.272s (-1.8%) 1.512s 22 1.01x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.087s (-8.3% 🟢) 4.613s (-4.5%) 1.526s 20 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.769s 1.006s 0.237s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.779s (-7.3% 🟢) 1.007s (-1.1%) 0.228s 120 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.816s (+3.7%) 1.009s (~) 0.193s 119 1.06x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.715s 3.057s 0.343s 40 3.53x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.608s 11.208s 0.600s 11 13.79x
💻 Local Express 10.949s (~) 11.392s (-2.3%) 0.443s 11 14.24x
💻 Local Nitro 11.265s (+1.1%) 11.938s (+0.8%) 0.673s 11 14.65x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.312s (-7.8% 🟢) 8.215s (-5.5% 🟢) 1.903s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 6.325s (-17.6% 🟢) 8.016s (-14.3% 🟢) 1.691s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.922s (-4.4%) 8.651s (~) 1.729s 14 1.10x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.186s 1.001s 0.001s 1.007s 0.821s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.191s 1.000s 0.002s 1.010s 0.819s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.192s 1.003s 0.012s 1.019s 0.827s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.199s (-7.2% 🟢) 0.995s (~) 0.002s (-5.9% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.810s 10 1.07x
💻 Local Nitro 0.207s (+40.3% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.012s (+31.9% 🔺) 1.018s (~) 0.811s 10 1.11x
💻 Local Express 0.215s (+2.8%) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (-18.7% 🟢) 1.016s (~) 0.802s 10 1.16x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.226s (+13.4% 🔺) 0.998s (~) 0.001s (-31.3% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.784s 10 1.22x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.566s (+5.9% 🔺) 2.998s (-0.9%) 0.501s (+65.4% 🔺) 3.923s (+4.2%) 2.356s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.724s (+10.9% 🔺) 3.224s (+7.7% 🔺) 0.374s (-36.1% 🟢) 4.089s (+2.0%) 2.366s 10 1.10x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.874s (+14.7% 🔺) 3.350s (+12.7% 🔺) 0.534s (+24.1% 🔺) 4.382s (+15.7% 🔺) 2.509s 10 1.20x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.505s 1.001s 0.003s 1.010s 0.505s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.607s 1.009s 0.004s 1.022s 0.415s 59 1.20x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.614s (-5.1% 🟢) 1.003s (~) 0.004s (-23.6% 🟢) 1.021s (~) 0.408s 59 1.21x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.648s (+7.1% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (-0.9%) 1.027s (+0.7%) 0.379s 59 1.28x
💻 Local Nitro 0.727s (+9.9% 🔺) 1.011s (~) 0.008s (-20.9% 🟢) 1.021s (~) 0.294s 59 1.44x
💻 Local Express 0.768s (+4.5%) 1.013s (~) 0.009s (-8.4% 🟢) 1.024s (~) 0.255s 59 1.52x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.920s 1.011s 0.011s 1.230s 0.309s 49 1.82x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.094s (-6.5% 🟢) 5.619s (-6.3% 🟢) 0.290s (-1.7%) 6.430s (-5.7% 🟢) 2.336s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.185s (-0.9%) 5.311s (-9.2% 🟢) 0.195s (-11.3% 🟢) 5.981s (-7.8% 🟢) 1.795s 11 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.778s (+16.2% 🔺) 6.217s (+11.3% 🔺) 0.242s (-66.7% 🟢) 6.923s (+3.6%) 2.144s 9 1.17x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.911s 1.000s 0.000s 1.004s 0.093s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.972s 1.225s 0.000s 1.233s 0.260s 49 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.973s (-1.9%) 1.210s (-9.4% 🟢) 0.000s (-13.7% 🟢) 1.223s (-10.7% 🟢) 0.249s 51 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.976s (+3.3%) 1.271s (+10.9% 🔺) 0.000s (-63.1% 🟢) 1.285s (+10.6% 🔺) 0.309s 47 1.07x
💻 Local Express 1.237s (-2.9%) 2.022s (~) 0.000s (-9.1% 🟢) 2.025s (~) 0.787s 30 1.36x
💻 Local Nitro 1.237s (-6.6% 🟢) 2.022s (~) 0.000s (-41.2% 🟢) 2.024s (~) 0.786s 30 1.36x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.355s 2.019s 0.000s 2.022s 0.666s 30 1.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.627s (+3.2%) 3.877s (+8.2% 🔺) 0.000s (-46.4% 🟢) 4.380s (+6.7% 🔺) 1.753s 14 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.811s (+6.3% 🔺) 3.855s (+3.8%) 0.000s (+7.1% 🔺) 4.324s (+4.4%) 1.513s 14 1.07x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.617s (+42.0% 🔺) 6.203s (+41.4% 🔺) 0.000s (-51.9% 🟢) 6.668s (+39.8% 🔺) 2.051s 9 1.76x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.604s 2.035s 0.000s 2.040s 0.435s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.740s (-2.6%) 2.099s (-2.0%) 0.000s (NaN%) 2.125s (-1.3%) 0.385s 29 1.08x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.746s (-2.1%) 2.104s (~) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.112s (~) 0.366s 29 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.826s 2.144s 0.000s 2.151s 0.325s 28 1.14x
💻 Local Nitro 3.539s (-10.3% 🟢) 4.099s (-9.6% 🟢) 0.000s (-57.6% 🟢) 4.102s (-9.6% 🟢) 0.563s 15 2.21x
💻 Local Express 3.613s (-1.3%) 4.034s (-3.2%) 0.000s (-36.4% 🟢) 4.037s (-3.2%) 0.424s 15 2.25x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.802s 4.233s 0.001s 4.239s 0.436s 15 2.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.896s (+9.6% 🔺) 5.268s (+7.7% 🔺) 0.000s (-63.6% 🟢) 5.726s (+7.5% 🔺) 1.830s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.124s (+21.5% 🔺) 5.922s (+22.0% 🔺) 0.001s (+300.0% 🔺) 6.401s (+20.5% 🔺) 2.277s 11 1.06x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.109s (+17.4% 🔺) 6.439s (+15.4% 🔺) 0.000s (-18.5% 🟢) 6.854s (+14.6% 🔺) 1.746s 9 1.31x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 9/21
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 16/21
▲ Vercel Nitro 11/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🌐 Redis 11/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 16/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 9, 2026 6:56pm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes lazy discovery step-file copying in @workflow/next by resolving and rewriting certain bare import specifiers (notably transitive SDK deps) based on the original source file’s location, and standardizes enhanced-resolve usage via the pnpm catalog.

Changes:

  • Add enhanced-resolve to the pnpm catalog and consume it via catalog: in @workflow/builders and @workflow/next.
  • In the deferred Next builder, resolve bare specifiers with enhanced-resolve (ESM-first, CJS fallback) and rewrite only when they’re not resolvable from the copied file’s app location.
  • Add a changeset for patch releases of @workflow/next and @workflow/builders.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
pnpm-workspace.yaml Adds enhanced-resolve to the shared version catalog.
pnpm-lock.yaml Updates lockfile to reflect catalog usage and dependency graph changes.
packages/next/src/builder-deferred.ts Implements bare-specifier resolution and conditional rewriting for copied step files.
packages/next/package.json Adds enhanced-resolve dependency via catalog:.
packages/builders/package.json Switches enhanced-resolve dependency to catalog:.
.changeset/lazy-discovery-bare-specifiers.md Declares patch releases for the affected packages.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread packages/next/src/builder-deferred.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +1346 to +1369
const resolveOptions = {
extensions: [
'.ts',
'.tsx',
'.mts',
'.cts',
'.cjs',
'.mjs',
'.js',
'.jsx',
'.json',
],
mainFields: ['main'],
mainFiles: ['index'],
symlinks: true,
};
const esmResolver = enhancedResolveOrig.create.sync({
...resolveOptions,
conditionNames: ['node', 'import'],
});
const cjsResolver = enhancedResolveOrig.create.sync({
...resolveOptions,
conditionNames: ['node', 'require'],
});
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier() constructs new enhanced-resolve ESM/CJS resolvers on every call. This is likely on a hot path while rewriting many imports, and create.sync() allocation can be expensive. Consider creating the resolvers once (e.g., lazily as private fields) and reusing them across calls.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. ESM and CJS resolvers are now cached as private class fields (esmSyncResolver, cjsSyncResolver), lazily initialized on first use.

Comment thread packages/next/src/builder-deferred.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +1284 to +1301
try {
const resolved = this.resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier(
specifier,
sourceFilePath
);
if (!resolved) return specifier;
let rewrittenPath = relative(
dirname(copiedFilePath),
resolved
).replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (!rewrittenPath.startsWith('.')) {
rewrittenPath = `./${rewrittenPath}`;
}
return rewrittenPath;
} catch {
// If resolution fails (e.g. Node.js builtins), keep as-is.
return specifier;
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The try/catch around resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier() is redundant because resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier() already swallows resolver errors and returns undefined on failure. Removing the outer try/catch would simplify control flow without changing behavior.

Suggested change
try {
const resolved = this.resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier(
specifier,
sourceFilePath
);
if (!resolved) return specifier;
let rewrittenPath = relative(
dirname(copiedFilePath),
resolved
).replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (!rewrittenPath.startsWith('.')) {
rewrittenPath = `./${rewrittenPath}`;
}
return rewrittenPath;
} catch {
// If resolution fails (e.g. Node.js builtins), keep as-is.
return specifier;
}
const resolved = this.resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier(
specifier,
sourceFilePath
);
if (!resolved) return specifier;
let rewrittenPath = relative(
dirname(copiedFilePath),
resolved
).replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (!rewrittenPath.startsWith('.')) {
rewrittenPath = `./${rewrittenPath}`;
}
return rewrittenPath;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. Removed the redundant outer try/catch since resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier() already handles errors internally and returns undefined on failure.

Comment thread packages/next/src/builder-deferred.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +1346 to +1361
const resolveOptions = {
extensions: [
'.ts',
'.tsx',
'.mts',
'.cts',
'.cjs',
'.mjs',
'.js',
'.jsx',
'.json',
],
mainFields: ['main'],
mainFiles: ['index'],
symlinks: true,
};
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The enhanced-resolve option set here is inconsistent with the resolver configuration used elsewhere in the repo (e.g. builders’ resolver includes dependencyType, exportsFields, importsFields, fullySpecified, etc.). Since this logic is meant to mirror bundler/module resolution semantics, consider reusing the same shared option set (or matching it field-for-field) to avoid subtle resolution differences across the toolchain.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. Now uses shared NODE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS and NODE_ESM_RESOLVE_OPTIONS constants that match the configuration in swc-esbuild-plugin.ts field-for-field (dependencyType, exportsFields, importsFields, fullySpecified, enforceExtensions, etc.).

- Cache ESM/CJS resolvers as class fields instead of re-creating per call
- Remove redundant try/catch (resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier already
  returns undefined on failure)
- Use shared NODE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS / NODE_ESM_RESOLVE_OPTIONS matching
  the configuration in swc-esbuild-plugin.ts for consistent resolution
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review: no blocking issues

// Shared resolve options matching the configuration used by the SWC
// esbuild plugin (swc-esbuild-plugin.ts) for consistent resolution
// semantics across the toolchain.
const NODE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS = {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Nit

These NODE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS / NODE_ESM_RESOLVE_OPTIONS blocks intentionally mirror packages/builders/src/swc-esbuild-plugin.ts. That is good for consistency today, but it can drift over time. A follow-up could centralize the object (for example exporting a helper from @workflow/builders) so the two call sites cannot diverge silently.

// Only rewrite when the specifier can't be resolved from the app
// directory. If the package is a direct dependency of the app,
// the bare specifier will resolve normally and should be left as-is.
const appResolvable = this.resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier(
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Nit

The comment refers to resolving from the app directory; resolveBareCopiedStepSpecifier uses dirname(copiedFilePath) as the resolver context (under __workflow_step_files__). Consider wording that matches that precisely so readers do not assume project-root or cwd semantics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants