Use pull_request_target for backport workflow to support fork PRs#1731
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
|
🧪 E2E Test Results❌ Some tests failed Summary
❌ Failed Tests▲ Vercel Production (2 failed)astro (1 failed):
express (1 failed):
🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)mongodb (7 failed):
redis (7 failed):
turso (60 failed):
Details by Category❌ ▲ Vercel Production
✅ 💻 Local Development
✅ 📦 Local Production
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
✅ 🪟 Windows
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
✅ 📋 Other
❌ Some E2E test jobs failed:
Check the workflow run for details. |
📊 Benchmark Results
workflow with no steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 1 step💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 10 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 25 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 50 sequential steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)workflow with stream💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)No data available stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express 10 parallel streams (1MB each)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)💻 Local Development
▲ Production (Vercel)
🔍 Observability: Express SummaryFastest Framework by WorldWinner determined by most benchmark wins
Fastest World by FrameworkWinner determined by most benchmark wins
Column Definitions
Worlds:
❌ Some benchmark jobs failed:
Check the workflow run for details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the backport automation workflow to work for pull requests opened from forks by running in the base repository context (so required secrets are available), while still only executing after merge + labeling.
Changes:
- Switch GitHub Actions trigger from
pull_requesttopull_request_targetfor the backport workflow.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Summary
pull_requestevent doesn't expose repository secrets for fork PRs, causing theGenerate GitHub App Tokenstep to fail withInput required and not supplied: app-idpull_request_targetwhich runs in the context of the base repository and has access to secretsThis is safe because:
closed(merged) andlabeledevents, meaning the PR was already approved by maintainersmain, never checking out or executing fork code