Skip to content

Use pull_request_target for backport workflow to support fork PRs#1731

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
nate/fix-backport-fork-prs
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

Use pull_request_target for backport workflow to support fork PRs#1731
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
nate/fix-backport-fork-prs

Conversation

@TooTallNate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TooTallNate TooTallNate commented Apr 14, 2026

Summary

  • Fix backport workflow failing on PRs from external contributors (forks), e.g. https://github.com/vercel/workflow/actions/runs/24410087349/job/71304128891
  • The pull_request event doesn't expose repository secrets for fork PRs, causing the Generate GitHub App Token step to fail with Input required and not supplied: app-id
  • Switch to pull_request_target which runs in the context of the base repository and has access to secrets

This is safe because:

  • We only trigger on closed (merged) and labeled events, meaning the PR was already approved by maintainers
  • We cherry-pick the merge commit from main, never checking out or executing fork code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 14, 2026 18:55
@TooTallNate TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2026 18:55
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 14, 2026 7:14pm

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 666b608

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 921 2 67 990
✅ 💻 Local Development 898 0 182 1080
✅ 📦 Local Production 835 0 155 990
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🪟 Windows 82 0 8 90
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 228 0 42 270
Total 3995 76 660 4731

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (2 failed)

astro (1 failed):

express (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e onFinish fires constructor + stream callbacks in order with event data
🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP6PJNMRDPCJBWFA53FCW9T0
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PJYGBTC2GNABHX58TZVS7
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PPHB0QGT85MB3YS5EJMGB
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP6PTW7Z7JD8QMRP56Z67HWS
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP6Q1PBC77JTHA3CHV1GM1DQ

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP6PJNMRDPCJBWFA53FCW9T0
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PJYGBTC2GNABHX58TZVS7
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PPHB0QGT85MB3YS5EJMGB
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP6PTW7Z7JD8QMRP56Z67HWS
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP6Q1PBC77JTHA3CHV1GM1DQ

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PHGEVYKEN0ZNQC23RM21B
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PHGEVYKEN0ZNQC23RM21B
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KP6PJFTVZGX6MDPEKFB2H7N4
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PHPZB06YFMN96M0A2XQFH
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PHT84S811Y1BXY8EBM0KY
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PHXGY75F6TDC5TSMKJKQS
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PJV0GRMTZP4ZRSWK4HHN4
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PJ9DB1JBZFWC3GJK1KEZ2
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KP6PJNMRDPCJBWFA53FCW9T0
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PJYGBTC2GNABHX58TZVS7
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PK5D70F9XA6FKQ06KHEF2
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PKJJTVC72WM8FQ8PY421C
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PKNTEFQ8HQG65H2PVQD01
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PKQX9R6TWNHS5B6192EPX
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PPHB0QGT85MB3YS5EJMGB
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KP6PPMP0G24XVP3HHNFQ6846
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KP6PT7RRQZ06G2GWEV1P2XEC
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KP6PTW7Z7JD8QMRP56Z67HWS
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KP6PVHDFHAZJ6REGDKP1KT0Y
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KP6PW53BWNWJ6V3AX620YYT2
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KP6PWF80CDFD8WK631D1252Q
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KP6PWMP2KSPEX7VQ3DPXN2EP
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KP6PWPSYWTHGP2S1Y9P2N0G6
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries | wrun_01KP6PX1WYZ77W52YBDQYK139G
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KP6PXGHK5G3ZSJSMKRYA2M2Q
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KP6PXP244JNRBBV5JGFKP8Q3
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KP6PXWPYRWPD53EH3WJWDMYB
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KP6PY3AC9RQWYYD9KPJWA4JY
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KP6PY9WDS5A5TWJBKP23T18S
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KP6PYHP4R1GYYC0MCD0Z80AB
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KP6PYRFHEZ3A472TRHSVE6NJ
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KP6PZ3GG50J0TH2B0KC9W043
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KP6PZCEW5NVRKJCBB1Z4ZJ88
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KP6PZKHVRGTJ40JW9KGGK3ZY
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KP6PZWRAAAXK38N1GD829XMA
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KP6Q0AZVDXMV3MGMDDMFXWBP
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KP6Q0ZMJW0JK2S2AHF15TYRX
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KP6Q1A2H8P942QHB9VT0SNQE
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KP6Q1HW1Z30FPH3K5D40P3FA
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KP6Q1M8FWNYVENHX6JJPFJGJ
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KP6Q1PBC77JTHA3CHV1GM1DQ
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KP6Q1V57JCWYTN7NC1YHMHD0

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ astro 82 1 7
✅ example 83 0 7
❌ express 82 1 7
✅ fastify 83 0 7
✅ hono 83 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 88 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 88 0 2
✅ nitro 83 0 7
✅ nuxt 83 0 7
✅ sveltekit 83 0 7
✅ vite 83 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 76 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: failure
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.041s (+11.8% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.964s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.044s (+6.5% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.961s 10 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.062s (-7.3% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.948s 10 1.53x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.063s (+10.1% 🔺) 1.010s (~) 0.946s 10 1.56x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.312s (+20.7% 🔺) 2.624s (+45.7% 🔺) 2.312s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.131s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.874s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.134s (+3.4%) 2.005s (~) 0.871s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.141s (-0.9%) 2.010s (~) 0.870s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.142s (-0.7%) 2.011s (~) 0.869s 10 1.01x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.929s (-2.7%) 3.687s (-4.6%) 1.758s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 10.880s (~) 11.026s (~) 0.146s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 10.918s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.105s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 10.919s (+2.7%) 11.024s (~) 0.105s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.962s (~) 11.020s (~) 0.059s 3 1.01x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 17.911s (+1.1%) 19.449s (-3.8%) 1.538s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 14.511s (~) 15.024s (~) 0.513s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.594s (~) 15.021s (~) 0.428s 4 1.01x
💻 Local Express 14.974s (+5.1% 🔺) 15.030s (~) 0.056s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 15.045s (~) 15.531s (+3.3%) 0.486s 4 1.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 32.953s (-7.8% 🟢) 34.575s (-8.6% 🟢) 1.623s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 13.881s (-0.5%) 14.024s (-2.0%) 0.143s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.069s (~) 14.881s (+1.0%) 0.812s 7 1.01x
💻 Local Express 16.678s (+10.9% 🔺) 17.031s (+9.7% 🔺) 0.353s 6 1.20x
💻 Local Nitro 16.890s (+0.9%) 17.031s (~) 0.141s 6 1.22x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 54.390s (~) 56.218s (~) 1.828s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.270s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.739s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.279s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.730s 15 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.516s (+5.2% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.490s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Nitro 1.549s (+1.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.457s 15 1.22x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.008s (+11.9% 🔺) 4.633s (+4.0%) 1.625s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.334s (-0.6%) 3.010s (~) 0.676s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.366s (~) 3.010s (~) 0.644s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 2.930s (+13.7% 🔺) 3.342s (+11.1% 🔺) 0.411s 9 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 3.046s (+2.8%) 3.886s (+3.4%) 0.840s 8 1.31x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.829s (+7.4% 🔺) 4.205s (-4.4%) 1.375s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.452s (-1.2%) 4.010s (~) 0.558s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.466s (-0.6%) 4.011s (~) 0.545s 8 1.00x
💻 Local Express 7.430s (+10.6% 🔺) 8.024s (+14.4% 🔺) 0.594s 4 2.15x
💻 Local Nitro 8.707s (+4.0%) 9.021s (~) 0.315s 4 2.52x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.176s (+1.5%) 4.731s (-4.0%) 1.555s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.250s (-1.4%) 2.008s (~) 0.758s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.266s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.744s 15 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.507s (+2.7%) 2.005s (~) 0.498s 15 1.21x
💻 Local Nitro 1.669s (+9.5% 🔺) 2.008s (~) 0.339s 15 1.33x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.358s (+2.5%) 4.097s (-5.3% 🟢) 1.739s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.337s (-1.1%) 3.011s (~) 0.674s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.341s (-0.9%) 3.011s (~) 0.670s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 2.897s (-2.5%) 3.008s (-10.0% 🟢) 0.111s 10 1.24x
💻 Local Nitro 3.274s (+5.7% 🔺) 4.010s (~) 0.736s 8 1.40x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.852s (+5.5% 🔺) 4.245s (-3.3%) 1.393s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.458s (-1.2%) 4.009s (~) 0.552s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.482s (-0.7%) 4.012s (~) 0.530s 8 1.01x
💻 Local Express 8.053s (~) 8.522s (-2.8%) 0.470s 4 2.33x
💻 Local Nitro 9.170s (-1.8%) 10.025s (~) 0.855s 3 2.65x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.365s (+4.6%) 5.282s (+3.2%) 1.917s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.810s (-3.2%) 1.006s (~) 0.196s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.834s (~) 1.024s (+1.7%) 0.190s 59 1.03x
💻 Local Express 1.019s (+45.4% 🔺) 1.720s (+71.3% 🔺) 0.701s 35 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 1.022s (+3.3%) 1.942s (+54.7% 🔺) 0.920s 31 1.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 9.807s (+1.4%) 12.119s (+4.9%) 2.312s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.897s (-3.4%) 2.052s (-7.8% 🟢) 0.155s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.963s (+1.3%) 2.227s (-1.1%) 0.264s 41 1.03x
💻 Local Express 3.032s (+24.2% 🔺) 3.729s (+17.3% 🔺) 0.697s 25 1.60x
💻 Local Nitro 3.080s (+2.0%) 3.967s (+10.6% 🔺) 0.886s 23 1.62x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 30.385s (+8.8% 🔺) 32.634s (+7.9% 🔺) 2.249s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.835s (-4.7%) 4.042s (-9.3% 🟢) 0.208s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.950s (+1.5%) 4.367s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.417s 28 1.03x
💻 Local Express 8.962s (+22.7% 🔺) 9.401s (+18.2% 🔺) 0.439s 13 2.34x
💻 Local Nitro 9.297s (+0.5%) 10.019s (~) 0.722s 12 2.42x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 77.811s (+9.6% 🔺) 80.081s (+8.7% 🔺) 2.270s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.278s (-1.5%) 1.007s (~) 0.728s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.279s (+1.2%) 1.007s (~) 0.728s 60 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.570s (-2.1%) 1.004s (~) 0.434s 60 2.05x
💻 Local Nitro 0.609s (+4.8%) 1.005s (~) 0.396s 60 2.19x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.475s (+2.3%) 3.013s (-6.4% 🟢) 1.538s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.477s (-4.5%) 1.006s (~) 0.529s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.488s (-2.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.518s 90 1.02x
💻 Local Express 2.406s (~) 3.008s (~) 0.602s 30 5.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.572s (+3.9%) 3.010s (~) 0.438s 30 5.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 155.180s (+5818.8% 🔺) 157.148s (+3407.1% 🔺) 1.968s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.782s (~) 1.007s (~) 0.226s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.794s (~) 1.016s (+0.8%) 0.222s 119 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.418s (+4.1%) 11.031s (+3.2%) 0.613s 11 13.33x
💻 Local Nitro 11.118s (~) 11.757s (-0.7%) 0.639s 11 14.23x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 8.002s (+21.3% 🔺) 10.146s (+17.7% 🔺) 2.144s 13 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.201s (-2.9%) 0.998s (~) 0.001s (~) 1.010s (~) 0.809s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.208s (+2.5%) 1.005s (~) 0.013s (+5.0% 🔺) 1.019s (~) 0.811s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Express 0.210s (+50.2% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (+9.6% 🔺) 1.016s (~) 0.806s 10 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.231s (+8.5% 🔺) 0.999s (~) 0.001s (-7.7% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.781s 10 1.15x

▲ Production (Vercel)

No data available

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.601s (-2.0%) 1.006s (~) 0.004s (+1.8%) 1.021s (~) 0.420s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.607s (~) 1.003s (~) 0.004s (-17.1% 🟢) 1.021s (~) 0.414s 59 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 0.732s (+0.7%) 1.012s (~) 0.010s (-1.2%) 1.024s (~) 0.292s 59 1.22x
💻 Local Express 0.840s (+50.5% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.008s (-5.4% 🟢) 1.115s (+9.1% 🔺) 0.275s 54 1.40x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.378s (+5.4% 🔺) 5.667s (-4.3%) 0.231s (-15.6% 🟢) 6.537s (-1.7%) 2.159s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.952s (-2.8%) 1.086s (-9.0% 🟢) 0.000s (-54.5% 🟢) 1.097s (-9.9% 🟢) 0.144s 56 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.965s (+2.0%) 1.265s (+8.2% 🔺) 0.000s (+77.1% 🔺) 1.279s (+8.0% 🔺) 0.314s 48 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.218s (+6.8% 🔺) 2.020s (~) 0.000s (+37.5% 🔺) 2.022s (~) 0.805s 30 1.28x
💻 Local Nitro 1.267s (+2.3%) 2.022s (~) 0.000s (+50.0% 🔺) 2.024s (~) 0.757s 30 1.33x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.541s (+35.1% 🔺) 5.030s (+31.2% 🔺) 0.001s (-53.0% 🟢) 5.482s (+26.9% 🔺) 1.941s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.742s (-2.1%) 2.099s (-1.8%) 0.000s (NaN%) 2.121s (-1.2%) 0.379s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.746s (-0.9%) 2.180s (+3.9%) 0.000s (+7.4% 🔺) 2.232s (+5.7% 🔺) 0.486s 27 1.00x
💻 Local Express 3.290s (~) 4.033s (+3.2%) 0.000s (-41.8% 🟢) 4.036s (+3.2%) 0.746s 15 1.89x
💻 Local Nitro 3.689s (+5.3% 🔺) 4.167s (+1.6%) 0.001s (-14.3% 🟢) 4.171s (+1.6%) 0.482s 15 2.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.221s (~) 5.478s (-3.1%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.918s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.697s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Express 17/21
🐘 Postgres Express 12/21
▲ Vercel Express 20/20
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the backport automation workflow to work for pull requests opened from forks by running in the base repository context (so required secrets are available), while still only executing after merge + labeling.

Changes:

  • Switch GitHub Actions trigger from pull_request to pull_request_target for the backport workflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread .github/workflows/backport.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/backport.yml
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants