ci: use GitHub API commit mode for changesets action by TooTallNate · Pull Request #1867 · vercel/workflow

TooTallNate · 2026-04-29T17:32:34Z

Summary

Follow-up to #1866. The Release workflow failed when trying to push the "Version Packages" PR commit to changeset-release/main:

remote: error: GH013: Repository rule violations found for refs/heads/changeset-release/main.
remote: - Commits must have verified signatures.

Org/enterprise-level rulesets require verified signatures on all branches in the repo. Commits pushed via the Git CLI using GITHUB_TOKEN are not signed.

This PR switches changesets/action to commitMode: github-api, which creates commits via the GitHub REST API. Commits made through the API are automatically GPG-signed by GitHub and therefore satisfy the signature requirement.

Note on backport workflow

backport.yml still pushes cherry-picks to stable via git push, which will likely also fail the signature rule. That can be addressed in a follow-up PR if/when the backport flow is exercised — the manual fallback documented in the workflow's failure comment still works.

The repo enforces "Commits must have verified signatures" via an org/enterprise-level ruleset, which blocks unsigned commits pushed via the Git CLI by GITHUB_TOKEN. Switching the changesets action to commitMode: github-api makes commits GPG-signed by GitHub.

vercel · 2026-04-29T17:32:35Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
example-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-astro-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-express-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-fastify-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-hono-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-nitro-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workbench-vite-workflow	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workflow-swc-playground	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm
workflow-web	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 29, 2026 5:37pm

changeset-bot · 2026-04-29T17:32:39Z

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 47511e1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

github-actions · 2026-04-29T17:32:47Z

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

Summary

	Passed	Failed	Skipped	Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production	981	8	67	1056
✅ 💻 Local Development	1066	0	86	1152
✅ 📦 Local Production	1066	0	86	1152
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres	1066	0	86	1152
✅ 📋 Other	270	0	18	288
Total	4449	8	343	4800

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (8 failed)

astro (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow positive startIndex (skips first chunk)

example (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow positive startIndex (skips first chunk)

express (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow - getTailIndex and getChunks getTailIndex returns correct index after stream completes

fastify (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow negative startIndex (reads from end)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow positive startIndex (skips first chunk)

nextjs-webpack (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow positive startIndex (skips first chunk)

nuxt (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow negative startIndex (reads from end)

vite (1 failed):

outputStreamWorkflow negative startIndex (reads from end)

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App	Passed	Failed	Skipped
❌ astro	88	1	7
❌ example	88	1	7
❌ express	88	1	7
❌ fastify	88	1	7
✅ hono	89	0	7
❌ nextjs-turbopack	93	1	2
❌ nextjs-webpack	93	1	2
✅ nitro	89	0	7
❌ nuxt	88	1	7
✅ sveltekit	89	0	7
❌ vite	88	1	7

✅ 💻 Local Development

App	Passed	Skipped
✅ astro-stable	90	6
✅ express-stable	90	6
✅ fastify-stable	90	6
✅ hono-stable	90	6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable	96	0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable	96	0
✅ nitro-stable	90	6
✅ nuxt-stable	90	6
✅ sveltekit-stable	90	6
✅ vite-stable	90	6

✅ 📦 Local Production

App	Passed	Skipped
✅ astro-stable	90	6
✅ express-stable	90	6
✅ fastify-stable	90	6
✅ hono-stable	90	6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable	96	0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable	96	0
✅ nitro-stable	90	6
✅ nuxt-stable	90	6
✅ sveltekit-stable	90	6
✅ vite-stable	90	6

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App	Passed	Skipped
✅ astro-stable	90	6
✅ express-stable	90	6
✅ fastify-stable	90	6
✅ hono-stable	90	6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable	96	0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary	77	19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable	96	0
✅ nitro-stable	90	6
✅ nuxt-stable	90	6
✅ sveltekit-stable	90	6
✅ vite-stable	90	6

✅ 📋 Other

App	Passed	Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable	90	6
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable	90	6
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable	90	6

📋 View full workflow run

❌ Some E2E test jobs failed:

Vercel Prod: failure
Local Dev: success
Local Prod: success
Local Postgres: success
Windows: cancelled

Check the workflow run for details.

github-actions · 2026-04-29T17:32:47Z

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
💻 Local	🥇 Nitro	0.044s (+2.1%)	1.005s (~)	0.961s	10	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.048s	1.009s	0.961s	10	1.09x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.049s	1.006s	0.956s	10	1.12x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.068s (-29.0% 🟢)	1.011s (-3.1%)	0.943s	10	1.54x
🐘 Postgres	Express	0.169s (+191.9% 🔺)	1.092s (+8.0% 🔺)	0.922s	10	3.85x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	1.113s	2.009s	0.896s	10	1.00x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	1.122s	2.006s	0.884s	10	1.01x
💻 Local	Nitro	1.129s (~)	2.006s (~)	0.876s	10	1.01x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	1.153s (+1.1%)	2.010s (~)	0.857s	10	1.04x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.198s (+4.5%)	2.030s (+1.0%)	0.832s	10	1.08x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	10.737s	11.017s	0.280s	3	1.00x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	10.813s	11.025s	0.212s	3	1.01x
💻 Local	Nitro	10.943s (~)	11.024s (~)	0.081s	3	1.02x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	10.948s (+0.7%)	11.027s (~)	0.079s	3	1.02x
🐘 Postgres	Express	11.863s (+8.2% 🔺)	12.365s (+12.2% 🔺)	0.501s	3	1.10x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	14.086s	15.022s	0.937s	4	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	14.729s (+0.9%)	15.029s (~)	0.300s	4	1.05x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	14.746s	15.031s	0.285s	4	1.05x
💻 Local	Nitro	15.059s (~)	15.782s (-1.5%)	0.724s	4	1.07x
🐘 Postgres	Express	15.911s (+9.1% 🔺)	16.298s (+8.5% 🔺)	0.388s	4	1.13x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	13.004s	13.307s	0.303s	7	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	14.208s (+1.7%)	15.024s (+5.0%)	0.816s	6	1.09x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	16.337s	17.033s	0.696s	6	1.26x
💻 Local	Nitro	16.780s (~)	17.032s (~)	0.252s	6	1.29x
🐘 Postgres	Express	17.831s (+27.3% 🔺)	18.591s (+27.4% 🔺)	0.760s	5	1.37x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	1.193s	2.009s	0.816s	15	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	1.279s (~)	2.011s (~)	0.732s	15	1.07x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.493s (+18.4% 🔺)	2.032s (+1.1%)	0.539s	15	1.25x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	1.506s	2.006s	0.501s	15	1.26x
💻 Local	Nitro	1.537s (-5.8% 🟢)	2.006s (-3.3%)	0.470s	15	1.29x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	2.343s	3.008s	0.665s	10	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	2.356s (~)	3.010s (~)	0.653s	10	1.01x
🐘 Postgres	Express	2.889s (+22.4% 🔺)	3.371s (+12.0% 🔺)	0.482s	9	1.23x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	2.916s	3.453s	0.538s	9	1.24x
💻 Local	Nitro	3.073s (-2.2%)	3.885s (~)	0.812s	8	1.31x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Nitro	3.532s (+1.5%)	4.013s (~)	0.481s	8	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Next.js (Turbopack)	3.548s	4.011s	0.463s	8	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Express	4.057s (+16.4% 🔺)	4.603s (+14.8% 🔺)	0.547s	7	1.15x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	8.470s	9.018s	0.548s	4	2.40x
💻 Local	Nitro	8.618s (+3.2%)	9.023s (~)	0.405s	4	2.44x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	1.186s	2.009s	0.822s	15	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	1.271s (+1.1%)	2.009s (~)	0.737s	15	1.07x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.376s (+9.4% 🔺)	2.096s (+4.4%)	0.720s	15	1.16x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	1.516s	2.007s	0.491s	15	1.28x
💻 Local	Nitro	1.936s (+3.8%)	2.407s (+2.9%)	0.472s	15	1.63x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Nitro	2.349s (~)	3.009s (~)	0.660s	10	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Next.js (Turbopack)	2.374s	3.008s	0.634s	10	1.01x
🐘 Postgres	Express	2.587s (+10.5% 🔺)	3.013s (~)	0.426s	10	1.10x
💻 Local	Nitro	3.075s (~)	3.886s (~)	0.810s	8	1.31x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	3.135s	4.010s	0.875s	8	1.33x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Nitro	3.504s (+0.7%)	4.011s (~)	0.507s	8	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Next.js (Turbopack)	3.551s	4.011s	0.460s	8	1.01x
🐘 Postgres	Express	4.624s (+32.1% 🔺)	5.241s (+30.7% 🔺)	0.617s	6	1.32x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	8.850s	9.521s	0.671s	4	2.53x
💻 Local	Nitro	9.125s (~)	9.525s (-5.0%)	0.401s	4	2.60x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.611s	1.006s	0.395s	60	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.839s (+2.2%)	1.006s (~)	0.168s	60	1.37x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.883s	1.039s	0.156s	58	1.45x
💻 Local	Nitro	1.026s (+4.6%)	1.854s (+69.5% 🔺)	0.828s	33	1.68x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.136s (+35.4% 🔺)	1.563s (+52.8% 🔺)	0.427s	39	1.86x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	1.518s	2.029s	0.511s	45	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	2.030s (+5.3% 🔺)	2.853s (+35.8% 🔺)	0.823s	32	1.34x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	2.788s	3.008s	0.221s	30	1.84x
🐘 Postgres	Express	2.877s (+45.6% 🔺)	3.347s (+48.2% 🔺)	0.470s	28	1.90x
💻 Local	Nitro	3.038s (~)	3.801s (+1.1%)	0.763s	24	2.00x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	3.117s	3.912s	0.795s	31	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	4.090s (~)	4.893s (+6.3% 🔺)	0.802s	25	1.31x
🐘 Postgres	Express	5.538s (+38.8% 🔺)	6.032s (+38.0% 🔺)	0.493s	21	1.78x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	8.964s	9.404s	0.440s	13	2.88x
💻 Local	Nitro	9.150s (-1.6%)	9.942s (-0.8%)	0.792s	13	2.94x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.198s	1.006s	0.809s	60	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.291s (+2.8%)	1.007s (~)	0.716s	60	1.47x
🐘 Postgres	Express	0.469s (+65.9% 🔺)	1.124s (+11.6% 🔺)	0.656s	54	2.37x
💻 Local	Nitro	0.589s (-2.7%)	1.005s (-1.6%)	0.416s	60	2.98x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.595s	1.005s	0.410s	60	3.01x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.407s	1.005s	0.598s	90	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.515s (+3.7%)	1.007s (~)	0.492s	90	1.26x
🐘 Postgres	Express	0.890s (+74.6% 🔺)	1.444s (+43.5% 🔺)	0.554s	63	2.19x
💻 Local	Nitro	2.505s (-1.3%)	3.009s (~)	0.504s	30	6.15x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	2.638s	3.009s	0.371s	30	6.48x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.621s	1.006s	0.385s	120	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.836s (+5.8% 🔺)	1.010s (~)	0.174s	119	1.35x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.008s (+23.1% 🔺)	1.400s (+37.7% 🔺)	0.393s	86	1.62x
💻 Local	Nitro	11.091s (-0.9%)	11.663s (~)	0.572s	11	17.86x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	11.544s	12.029s	0.485s	11	18.59x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)

workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	TTFB	Slurp	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.159s	1.001s	0.001s	1.010s	0.850s	10	1.00x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.178s	1.003s	0.013s	1.019s	0.841s	10	1.12x
💻 Local	Nitro	0.205s (-4.2%)	1.004s (~)	0.012s (-3.2%)	1.018s (~)	0.814s	10	1.29x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.224s (+9.4% 🔺)	0.995s (~)	0.001s (-13.3% 🟢)	1.012s (~)	0.787s	10	1.41x
🐘 Postgres	Express	0.408s (+99.1% 🔺)	0.994s (~)	0.630s (+39281.3% 🔺)	1.638s (+62.0% 🔺)	1.230s	10	2.56x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-	-

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	TTFB	Slurp	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.542s	1.025s	0.003s	1.037s	0.495s	58	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	0.653s (+4.6%)	1.020s (+1.3%)	0.004s (-4.1%)	1.042s (+1.9%)	0.389s	58	1.20x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	0.693s	1.012s	0.010s	1.024s	0.331s	59	1.28x
💻 Local	Nitro	0.846s (+0.8%)	1.012s (~)	0.009s (-8.7% 🟢)	1.115s (~)	0.269s	54	1.56x
🐘 Postgres	Express	0.987s (+56.6% 🔺)	1.402s (+39.3% 🔺)	0.095s (+2369.0% 🔺)	1.521s (+48.7% 🔺)	0.534s	40	1.82x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-	-

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	TTFB	Slurp	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	0.898s	1.053s	0.000s	1.060s	0.162s	57	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	1.013s (+4.6%)	1.413s (+13.2% 🔺)	0.000s (+11.6% 🔺)	1.428s (+13.5% 🔺)	0.414s	43	1.13x
💻 Local	Nitro	1.225s (~)	2.021s (~)	0.000s (+333.3% 🔺)	2.023s (~)	0.798s	30	1.36x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	1.328s	2.022s	0.001s	2.025s	0.697s	30	1.48x
🐘 Postgres	Express	1.696s (+76.5% 🔺)	2.074s (+62.3% 🔺)	0.000s (-17.9% 🟢)	2.164s (+65.7% 🔺)	0.468s	28	1.89x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-	-

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World	Framework	Workflow Time	TTFB	Slurp	Wall Time	Overhead	Samples	vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres	🥇 Next.js (Turbopack)	1.782s	2.105s	0.000s	2.111s	0.329s	29	1.00x
🐘 Postgres	Nitro	1.879s (+4.9%)	2.307s (+7.7% 🔺)	0.000s (+7.7% 🔺)	2.319s (+6.6% 🔺)	0.439s	26	1.05x
🐘 Postgres	Express	2.537s (+43.2% 🔺)	2.816s (+29.3% 🔺)	0.000s (NaN%)	2.884s (+31.2% 🔺)	0.347s	21	1.42x
💻 Local	Nitro	3.721s (+9.8% 🔺)	4.032s (~)	0.000s (-19.6% 🟢)	4.392s (+8.8% 🔺)	0.672s	14	2.09x
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	3.903s	4.389s	0.001s	4.394s	0.491s	14	2.19x
💻 Local	Express	⚠️ missing	-	-	-	-	-

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World	🥇 Fastest Framework	Wins
💻 Local	Next.js (Turbopack)	14/21
🐘 Postgres	Next.js (Turbopack)	18/21

Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework	🥇 Fastest World	Wins
Express	🐘 Postgres	21/21
Next.js (Turbopack)	🐘 Postgres	21/21
Nitro	🐘 Postgres	17/21

Column Definitions

Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

❌ Some benchmark jobs failed:

Local: failure
Postgres: success
Vercel: cancelled

Check the workflow run for details.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Updates the Release workflow to satisfy repository rulesets that require verified/signed commits by switching changesets’ commit mechanism to the GitHub API (which produces GitHub-verified commits), preventing failures when pushing the version PR commit.

Changes:

Configure changesets/action to use commitMode: github-api to create verified commits via the GitHub REST API.
Add an inline comment explaining why the GitHub API commit mode is required.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

The repo enforces "Commits must have verified signatures" via an org/enterprise-level ruleset, which blocks unsigned commits pushed via the Git CLI by GITHUB_TOKEN. Switching the changesets action to commitMode: github-api makes commits GPG-signed by GitHub.

…#1913) * ci: upgrade pnpm/action-setup to v5 and read version from package.json (#1785) * ci: upgrade pnpm/action-setup to v6 and read version from package.json Removes hardcoded pnpm version (10.14.0) from all workflows and instead reads the version from the packageManager field in package.json, so CI stays in sync with the version used locally. * ci: update setup-workflow-dev composite action to use pnpm/action-setup@v6 Also removes the pnpm-version input since the action now reads the version from package.json#packageManager. * ci: downgrade pnpm/action-setup to v5 v6 installs pnpm 11 RC/beta, which has a regression (pnpm/pnpm#11264, pnpm/action-setup#225/#227/#228) that causes 'ERR_PNPM_BROKEN_LOCKFILE: expected a single document in the stream' when the project's packageManager pins a 10.x pnpm version. v5 is the latest stable release before v6 and supports reading the version from package.json#packageManager. * ci: stop using Release App token in release workflows (#1866) The Release App has been temporarily removed. Switch the Release and Backport workflows to use the default GITHUB_TOKEN, and disable the cross-repo Front dispatch workflow until the App is restored. Also add a workflow_dispatch trigger to release.yml so the Version Packages PR can be created/updated manually (since pushes made by GITHUB_TOKEN do not trigger downstream workflow runs). * ci: use GitHub API commit mode for changesets action (#1867) The repo enforces "Commits must have verified signatures" via an org/enterprise-level ruleset, which blocks unsigned commits pushed via the Git CLI by GITHUB_TOKEN. Switching the changesets action to commitMode: github-api makes commits GPG-signed by GitHub. * Add changeset for backport * Potential fix for pull request finding Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io> --------- Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io> Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

…#1918) * ci: upgrade pnpm/action-setup to v5 and read version from package.json (#1785) * ci: upgrade pnpm/action-setup to v6 and read version from package.json Removes hardcoded pnpm version (10.14.0) from all workflows and instead reads the version from the packageManager field in package.json, so CI stays in sync with the version used locally. * ci: update setup-workflow-dev composite action to use pnpm/action-setup@v6 Also removes the pnpm-version input since the action now reads the version from package.json#packageManager. * ci: downgrade pnpm/action-setup to v5 v6 installs pnpm 11 RC/beta, which has a regression (pnpm/pnpm#11264, pnpm/action-setup#225/#227/#228) that causes 'ERR_PNPM_BROKEN_LOCKFILE: expected a single document in the stream' when the project's packageManager pins a 10.x pnpm version. v5 is the latest stable release before v6 and supports reading the version from package.json#packageManager. * ci: stop using Release App token in release workflows (#1866) The Release App has been temporarily removed. Switch the Release and Backport workflows to use the default GITHUB_TOKEN, and disable the cross-repo Front dispatch workflow until the App is restored. Also add a workflow_dispatch trigger to release.yml so the Version Packages PR can be created/updated manually (since pushes made by GITHUB_TOKEN do not trigger downstream workflow runs). * ci: use GitHub API commit mode for changesets action (#1867) The repo enforces "Commits must have verified signatures" via an org/enterprise-level ruleset, which blocks unsigned commits pushed via the Git CLI by GITHUB_TOKEN. Switching the changesets action to commitMode: github-api makes commits GPG-signed by GitHub. * Add changeset for backport * Potential fix for pull request finding Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io> --------- Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io> Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 29, 2026 17:32

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of TooTallNate April 29, 2026 17:33 View session

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workflow-web April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

karthikscale3 approved these changes Apr 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-vite-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-express-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-hono-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-astro-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – example-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow April 29, 2026 17:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack April 29, 2026 17:34 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack April 29, 2026 17:34 View deployment

Copilot AI reviewed Apr 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

TooTallNate merged commit 787bb15 into main Apr 29, 2026
80 of 91 checks passed

TooTallNate deleted the ci/release-signed-commits branch April 29, 2026 17:34

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workflow-docs April 29, 2026 17:34 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – workflow-swc-playground April 29, 2026 17:37 View deployment

TooTallNate mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026

[backport] [ci] Stop using Release App token + bump pnpm/action-setup #1913

Merged

TooTallNate mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026

[backport] [ci] Stop using Release App token + bump pnpm/action-setup #1918

Merged

Conversation

TooTallNate commented Apr 29, 2026

Summary

Note on backport workflow

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🧪 E2E Test Results

Summary

❌ Failed Tests

Details by Category

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📊 Benchmark Results

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

💻 Local Development

Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

vercel Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading