Skip to content

ScalarFn validity#8514

Draft
gatesn wants to merge 22 commits into
developfrom
ngates/scalar-fn-validity
Draft

ScalarFn validity#8514
gatesn wants to merge 22 commits into
developfrom
ngates/scalar-fn-validity

Add remaining scalar function validity hooks

ca773ed
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Jun 19, 2026 in 0s

6 benchmarks regressed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1570 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation decompress_rd[f64, (10000, 0.01)] 108.9 µs 135.1 µs -19.44%
Simulation decompress_rd[f64, (10000, 0.0)] 108.9 µs 135.1 µs -19.4%
Simulation decompress_rd[f32, (100000, 0.0)] 496.1 µs 583.8 µs -15.02%
Simulation decompress_rd[f64, (10000, 0.1)] 109.2 µs 125.5 µs -13%
Simulation patched_take_10k_adversarial 259.7 µs 289.1 µs -10.16%
Simulation patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches 259.6 µs 288.9 µs -10.14%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] 244.4 ns 186.1 ns +31.34%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] 304.7 ns 246.4 ns +23.68%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] 205.6 µs 168.9 µs +21.74%
Simulation decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.1)] 1,020.9 µs 842.8 µs +21.13%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[2048] 427.8 ns 369.4 ns +15.79%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ngates/scalar-fn-validity (ca773ed) with develop (97850e9)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on develop (3f54d1f) during the generation of this report, so 97850e9 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.