Fixed spelling of "separated" - #149
Merged
Merged
Conversation
I know it's super trivial, but boy my 11th grade teacher sure did permanently burn the spelling of that word into my head.
|
|
pksjce
approved these changes
May 18, 2017
|
Thanking you "separately" 🥇 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I know it's super trivial, but boy my 11th grade teacher sure did permanently burn the spelling of that word into my head.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
It fixes the spelling of "separated" in the one of the prompts in the
initworkflow.Did you add tests for your changes?
I did not, but could probably give Mr. Kelly a call to confirm if you'd like.
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant.
Summary
The motivation for making this change was to add polish for a very promising tool that countless users are likely to use.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.