-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
linux: export getauxval when not compiling with libc #16977
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
731c6d3
linux: export elf_aux_maybe so that libraries can call getauxval
kcbanner fba81cd
linux: instead of export elf_aux_maybe, export getauxval itself
kcbanner fb0cef8
linux: only export getauxval if not linking libc
kcbanner 2e2d6d2
linux: fixup for platforms that don't support extern functions yet
kcbanner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I understand, we are exporting it as weak because we expect it to be overriden by a different version in an exe/dso that has
getauxvalhooked up into startup routine? What if we're building an exe and link with a dso? Which version takes precedence then? Do I even understand the problem correctly here?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, exactly. The intention is that the version used is the one that references the
elf_aux_maybeinitialized by the startup code.My assumption had been that the version in the exe would take precedence, but if this is not true in all cases then this solution won't be adequate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha thanks!