Module: keep frame pointer in ReleaseSmall on x86#22271
Conversation
On x86 and x86_64 keeping the frame pointer usually reduces binary size, even for simple programs:
```
~$ cat x.zig
pub fn main() void {
@import("std").debug.print("hello", .{});
}
~$ zig build-exe x.zig -target x86_64-linux -OReleaseSmall -fno-omit-frame-pointer && wc -c x
5168 x
~$ zig build-exe x.zig -target x86_64-linux -OReleaseSmall -fomit-frame-pointer && wc -c x
5216 x
```
```
~$ cat x.zig
pub fn main() void {
@import("std").debug.print("hello", .{});
}
~$ zig build-exe x.zig -target x86-linux -OReleaseSmall -fno-omit-frame-pointer && wc -c x
3400 x
~$ zig build-exe x.zig -target x86-linux -OReleaseSmall -fomit-frame-pointer && wc -c x
3556 x
```
A bigger benchmark is the Zig compiler:
With no changes to anything on master branch:
```
$ zig build -Dno-lib -Dno-langref --zig-lib-dir lib -Doptimize=ReleaseSmall
$ wc -c zig-out/bin/zig
10698792 zig-out/bin/zig
```
Adding `.omit_frame_pointer = false` in `addCompilerStep` in `build.zig`:
```
$ zig build -Dno-lib -Dno-langref --zig-lib-dir lib -Doptimize=ReleaseSmall
$ wc -c zig-out/bin/zig
10155744 zig-out/bin/zig
```
alexrp
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2024
Member
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On x86 and x86_64 keeping the frame pointer usually reduces binary size, even for simple programs:
A bigger benchmark is the Zig compiler:
With no changes to anything on master branch:
Adding
.omit_frame_pointer = falseinaddCompilerStepinbuild.zig:x86 seems to be a bit of a special case. I couldn't find any other architecture where this reduces binary size.
Progress towards #22270