try to speedup cache

[AlexInLog]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated workflow configurations to enhance caching mechanisms for dependencies.
  • Improved cache accuracy by modifying cache keys to include additional hash from CMakePresets.json.
  • Introduced conditional execution in jobs based on cache checks, optimizing workflow efficiency.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the workflow configurations in .github/workflows/analyzers.yml and .github/workflows/ci v2.yml to enhance caching mechanisms for dependencies across multiple jobs. The cache keys have been modified to include a hash based on the CMakePresets.json file, which improves cache accuracy. Additionally, the cache_deps job has undergone several modifications, including renaming steps, adding identifiers, and implementing conditional execution based on cache checks.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/analyzers.yml	Updated cache keys for pvs and sonarcloud_and_coverage jobs to include CMakePresets.json hash.
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml	Modified cache_deps job: renamed caching step, added step ID, updated cache key, introduced lookup-only option, and added conditional execution for subsequent steps.

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies play,
Caching's improved, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨
With presets in tow, our jobs are so spry,
No more missed caches, oh my, oh my!
Hopping through workflows, swift as a breeze,
Let's celebrate changes with joyful ease! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

.github/workflows/analyzers.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-165: Consider further cache optimization

The changes made to include CMakePresets.json in the cache keys are beneficial. To potentially further optimize caching, consider the following suggestion:

You could split the cache into two separate caches: one for Conan dependencies and another for CMake-related files. This approach might provide more granular control over what gets invalidated when either Conan dependencies or CMake presets change.

Example:

- name: Cache Conan dependencies
  uses: actions/cache@v4
  with:
    path: ~/.conan2
    key: conan-deps-${{ runner.os }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}

- name: Cache CMake files
  uses: actions/cache@v4
  with:
    path: build
    key: cmake-${{ runner.os }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}

This separation could potentially lead to fewer full rebuilds, as changes to CMake presets wouldn't invalidate the Conan dependency cache, and vice versa.

.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (1)

194-194: Consistent caching strategy applied with room for improvement

The update to include the hash of CMakePresets.json in the cache key for the tests job maintains consistency with the changes made in other jobs. This ensures a uniform caching strategy across the workflow.

However, consider adding conditional execution for the conan detect profile and Run CMake steps in this job, similar to the cache_deps job. This could further optimize the workflow by skipping these steps when the cache is hit.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16fe752 and d372d79.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (5)

.github/workflows/analyzers.yml (2)

42-42: Improved cache key for better accuracy

The addition of CMakePresets.json to the cache key is a good improvement. This ensures that the cache is invalidated when CMake presets change, which could affect the build. This change aligns well with the PR objective of speeding up the cache by reducing cache misses when CMake configurations change.

---

115-115: Consistent cache key improvement across jobs

This change is consistent with the improvement made in the pvs job. Adding CMakePresets.json to the cache key in the sonarcloud_and_coverage job ensures consistent behavior across different parts of the workflow. This consistency is good for maintainability and helps achieve the PR's objective of speeding up the cache uniformly.

.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (3)

56-73: Excellent improvements to the caching mechanism!

The changes in the cache_deps job are well-implemented and should significantly improve the workflow efficiency:

1. Renaming the step to "check cache" and adding an ID improves clarity and allows for conditional execution.
2. Including the hash of CMakePresets.json in the cache key enhances cache accuracy.
3. The lookup-only: true option allows for checking cache existence without restoration, potentially saving time.
4. Conditional execution of subsequent steps based on cache hit status prevents unnecessary work.

These optimizations should lead to faster builds and more efficient use of GitHub Actions resources.

---

117-117: Consistent caching strategy applied

The update to include the hash of CMakePresets.json in the cache key for the sanitize job is consistent with the changes made in other jobs. This ensures a uniform caching strategy across the workflow.

---

Line range hint 1-294: Overall excellent improvements to workflow efficiency

The changes made across the workflow file are well-aligned with the PR objective of speeding up the cache. Key improvements include:

1. Consistent use of CMakePresets.json hash in cache keys across all jobs.
2. Introduction of cache lookup-only and conditional execution in the cache_deps job.
3. Maintaining the overall structure of the workflow while optimizing critical parts.

These changes should lead to faster builds and more efficient use of GitHub Actions resources. Great job on improving the workflow!

To further enhance the improvements:

1. Consider applying the conditional execution strategy used in the cache_deps job to other jobs like tests and sanitize.
2. After merging these changes, monitor the workflow run times and cache hit rates to quantify the improvements and identify any areas for further optimization.

To verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script after merging:

This script will help quantify the impact of the caching improvements on overall workflow execution time.

[github-actions]

BENCHMARK RESULTS (AUTOGENERATED)

ci-ubuntu-gcc

General

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable	300.44 ns	2.16 ns	2.16 ns	1.00
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable via pipe operator	307.61 ns	2.16 ns	2.16 ns	1.00

Sources

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + immediate	740.24 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + current_thread	1049.96 ns	3.71 ns	3.71 ns	1.00
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) create + subscribe	2317.89 ns	142.75 ns	144.18 ns	0.99
defer from array of 1 - defer + create + subscribe + immediate	757.40 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + immediate	2174.58 ns	59.23 ns	59.59 ns	0.99
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + current_thread	3067.19 ns	32.45 ns	32.40 ns	1.00
from array of 1 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	29058.08 ns	27339.36 ns	27714.29 ns	0.99
from array of 1000 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	40153.42 ns	50962.10 ns	50450.63 ns	1.01
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) and just(1,2 immediate)create + subscribe	3537.69 ns	217.42 ns	215.76 ns	1.01

Filtering Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take(1)+subscribe	1140.35 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+filter(true)+subscribe	875.77 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2)+skip(1)+subscribe	1006.18 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,1,2)+distinct_until_changed()+subscribe	915.70 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	0.99
immediate_just(1,2)+first()+subscribe	1258.37 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2)+last()+subscribe	925.45 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	0.99
immediate_just+take_last(1)+subscribe	1145.98 ns	18.22 ns	19.02 ns	0.96
immediate_just(1,2,3)+element_at(1)+subscribe	883.50 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00

Schedulers

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate scheduler create worker + schedule	271.35 ns	2.16 ns	5.31 ns	0.41
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule	384.48 ns	5.87 ns	10.32 ns	0.57
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule + recursive schedule	810.55 ns	55.64 ns	63.33 ns	0.88

Transforming Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+map(v*2)+subscribe	869.62 ns	0.31 ns	0.32 ns	0.97
immediate_just+scan(10, std::plus)+subscribe	895.61 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+flat_map(immediate_just(v*2))+subscribe	2335.44 ns	193.03 ns	252.76 ns	0.76
immediate_just+buffer(2)+subscribe	1538.32 ns	13.90 ns	13.90 ns	1.00
immediate_just+window(2)+subscribe + subscsribe inner	2367.97 ns	1320.91 ns	1692.57 ns	0.78

Conditional Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take_while(false)+subscribe	911.25 ns	-	-	0.00
immediate_just+take_while(true)+subscribe	915.62 ns	0.31 ns	0.32 ns	0.95

Utility Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(1)+subscribe_on(immediate)+subscribe	2076.27 ns	0.31 ns	0.71 ns	0.43

Combining Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(immediate_just(1), immediate_just(1)) + merge() + subscribe	3409.27 ns	236.14 ns	301.54 ns	0.78
immediate_just(1) + merge_with(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	3737.79 ns	191.43 ns	199.66 ns	0.96
immediate_just(1) + with_latest_from(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	-	181.65 ns	335.78 ns	0.54
immediate_just(immediate_just(1),immediate_just(1)) + switch_on_next() + subscribe	3554.16 ns	1158.93 ns	1540.45 ns	0.75
immediate_just(1) + zip(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	2110.91 ns	225.33 ns	240.04 ns	0.94

Subjects

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
publish_subject with 1 observer - on_next	34.46 ns	14.72 ns	14.64 ns	1.01
subscribe 100 observers to publish_subject	198717.67 ns	16616.73 ns	25168.62 ns	0.66
100 on_next to 100 observers to publish_subject	27104.60 ns	20244.45 ns	18569.77 ns	1.09

Scenarios

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
basic sample	1408.30 ns	12.66 ns	12.66 ns	1.00
basic sample with immediate scheduler	1420.20 ns	5.55 ns	5.55 ns	1.00

Aggregating Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+reduce(10, std::plus)+subscribe	917.15 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00

Error Handling Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
create(on_next(1), on_error())+on_error_resume_next(immediate_just(2)))+subscribe	2072.23 ns	917.91 ns	965.13 ns	0.95
create(on_error())+retry(1)+subscribe	624.78 ns	121.55 ns	122.00 ns	1.00

ci-macos

General

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable	1078.50 ns	4.34 ns	7.47 ns	0.58
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable via pipe operator	1078.35 ns	4.32 ns	15.00 ns	0.29

Sources

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + immediate	2128.05 ns	0.26 ns	0.85 ns	0.30
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + current_thread	2682.25 ns	36.87 ns	206.48 ns	0.18
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) create + subscribe	8867.91 ns	704.29 ns	622.39 ns	1.13
defer from array of 1 - defer + create + subscribe + immediate	3441.50 ns	0.28 ns	0.41 ns	0.68
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + immediate	5513.77 ns	134.27 ns	149.45 ns	0.90
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + current_thread	8055.59 ns	106.80 ns	130.42 ns	0.82
from array of 1 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	109635.44 ns	101020.18 ns	3226289.00 ns	0.03
from array of 1000 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	128264.33 ns	119832.80 ns	1284963.00 ns	0.09
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) and just(1,2 immediate)create + subscribe	10127.71 ns	869.79 ns	825.61 ns	1.05

Filtering Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take(1)+subscribe	3186.73 ns	0.26 ns	0.34 ns	0.76
immediate_just+filter(true)+subscribe	2348.97 ns	0.26 ns	1.30 ns	0.20
immediate_just(1,2)+skip(1)+subscribe	3066.11 ns	0.26 ns	0.38 ns	0.68
immediate_just(1,1,2)+distinct_until_changed()+subscribe	2315.18 ns	0.52 ns	4.20 ns	0.12
immediate_just(1,2)+first()+subscribe	3588.52 ns	0.26 ns	0.85 ns	0.30
immediate_just(1,2)+last()+subscribe	2681.04 ns	0.26 ns	1.27 ns	0.20
immediate_just+take_last(1)+subscribe	3356.30 ns	0.26 ns	1.33 ns	0.19
immediate_just(1,2,3)+element_at(1)+subscribe	2471.31 ns	0.26 ns	1.31 ns	0.20

Schedulers

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate scheduler create worker + schedule	944.24 ns	5.75 ns	5.44 ns	1.06
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule	1312.47 ns	40.13 ns	51.23 ns	0.78
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule + recursive schedule	2206.26 ns	222.56 ns	266.40 ns	0.84

Transforming Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+map(v*2)+subscribe	2330.68 ns	4.89 ns	5.78 ns	0.85
immediate_just+scan(10, std::plus)+subscribe	2582.36 ns	0.52 ns	0.60 ns	0.85
immediate_just+flat_map(immediate_just(v*2))+subscribe	5915.21 ns	740.90 ns	522.72 ns	1.42
immediate_just+buffer(2)+subscribe	2795.19 ns	71.21 ns	68.00 ns	1.05
immediate_just+window(2)+subscribe + subscsribe inner	6064.54 ns	2634.12 ns	3206.55 ns	0.82

Conditional Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take_while(false)+subscribe	2315.86 ns	-	-	0.00
immediate_just+take_while(true)+subscribe	2331.49 ns	0.26 ns	0.31 ns	0.83

Utility Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(1)+subscribe_on(immediate)+subscribe	5491.44 ns	5.41 ns	6.87 ns	0.79

Combining Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(immediate_just(1), immediate_just(1)) + merge() + subscribe	8235.34 ns	654.67 ns	689.77 ns	0.95
immediate_just(1) + merge_with(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	9290.61 ns	561.44 ns	1515.69 ns	0.37
immediate_just(1) + with_latest_from(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	-	653.87 ns	1794.92 ns	0.36
immediate_just(immediate_just(1),immediate_just(1)) + switch_on_next() + subscribe	8799.28 ns	2104.88 ns	5748.71 ns	0.37
immediate_just(1) + zip(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	5695.84 ns	1002.44 ns	4657.14 ns	0.22

Subjects

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
publish_subject with 1 observer - on_next	84.10 ns	54.05 ns	84.78 ns	0.64
subscribe 100 observers to publish_subject	390505.33 ns	45786.91 ns	59110.00 ns	0.77
100 on_next to 100 observers to publish_subject	58802.05 ns	21225.62 ns	50365.86 ns	0.42

Scenarios

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
basic sample	3087.70 ns	74.91 ns	281.20 ns	0.27
basic sample with immediate scheduler	3109.91 ns	20.08 ns	56.23 ns	0.36

Aggregating Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+reduce(10, std::plus)+subscribe	2656.11 ns	0.26 ns	0.32 ns	0.82

Error Handling Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
create(on_next(1), on_error())+on_error_resume_next(immediate_just(2)))+subscribe	7200.31 ns	4322.53 ns	4974.96 ns	0.87
create(on_error())+retry(1)+subscribe	2047.97 ns	405.03 ns	519.21 ns	0.78

ci-ubuntu-clang

General

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable	266.17 ns	1.54 ns	1.54 ns	1.00
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable via pipe operator	264.63 ns	1.54 ns	1.54 ns	1.00

Sources

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + immediate	558.76 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + current_thread	789.46 ns	4.02 ns	4.01 ns	1.00
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) create + subscribe	2346.49 ns	185.65 ns	187.18 ns	0.99
defer from array of 1 - defer + create + subscribe + immediate	769.03 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + immediate	2212.98 ns	58.31 ns	58.30 ns	1.00
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + current_thread	3165.47 ns	30.88 ns	30.88 ns	1.00
from array of 1 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	30775.78 ns	28234.81 ns	28417.28 ns	0.99
from array of 1000 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	40543.54 ns	38314.88 ns	35287.29 ns	1.09
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) and just(1,2 immediate)create + subscribe	3707.70 ns	301.39 ns	307.41 ns	0.98

Filtering Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take(1)+subscribe	1131.93 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+filter(true)+subscribe	840.76 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2)+skip(1)+subscribe	1066.84 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,1,2)+distinct_until_changed()+subscribe	868.09 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2)+first()+subscribe	1369.67 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2)+last()+subscribe	991.52 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+take_last(1)+subscribe	1263.76 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2,3)+element_at(1)+subscribe	860.41 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00

Schedulers

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate scheduler create worker + schedule	276.48 ns	1.54 ns	1.54 ns	1.00
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule	386.69 ns	4.56 ns	4.59 ns	0.99
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule + recursive schedule	845.80 ns	55.91 ns	55.55 ns	1.01

Transforming Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+map(v*2)+subscribe	848.15 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+scan(10, std::plus)+subscribe	958.61 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00
immediate_just+flat_map(immediate_just(v*2))+subscribe	2231.74 ns	226.88 ns	228.46 ns	0.99
immediate_just+buffer(2)+subscribe	1593.21 ns	13.59 ns	13.58 ns	1.00
immediate_just+window(2)+subscribe + subscsribe inner	2425.37 ns	928.83 ns	932.76 ns	1.00

Conditional Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take_while(false)+subscribe	831.43 ns	-	-	0.00
immediate_just+take_while(true)+subscribe	847.28 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	0.99

Utility Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(1)+subscribe_on(immediate)+subscribe	2013.93 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00

Combining Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(immediate_just(1), immediate_just(1)) + merge() + subscribe	3267.25 ns	290.46 ns	290.63 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1) + merge_with(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	3760.46 ns	215.25 ns	216.09 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1) + with_latest_from(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	-	197.80 ns	198.44 ns	1.00
immediate_just(immediate_just(1),immediate_just(1)) + switch_on_next() + subscribe	3380.83 ns	840.51 ns	841.94 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1) + zip(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	2185.02 ns	197.39 ns	198.22 ns	1.00

Subjects

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
publish_subject with 1 observer - on_next	63.22 ns	29.55 ns	18.25 ns	1.62
subscribe 100 observers to publish_subject	210825.20 ns	19657.04 ns	16040.67 ns	1.23
100 on_next to 100 observers to publish_subject	45997.09 ns	20477.67 ns	20793.16 ns	0.98

Scenarios

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
basic sample	1295.07 ns	11.42 ns	11.42 ns	1.00
basic sample with immediate scheduler	1280.66 ns	6.17 ns	6.17 ns	1.00

Aggregating Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+reduce(10, std::plus)+subscribe	993.43 ns	0.31 ns	0.31 ns	1.00

Error Handling Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
create(on_next(1), on_error())+on_error_resume_next(immediate_just(2)))+subscribe	2188.68 ns	1010.83 ns	1004.24 ns	1.01
create(on_error())+retry(1)+subscribe	649.20 ns	158.77 ns	162.55 ns	0.98

ci-windows

General

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable	556.15 ns	4.02 ns	5.32 ns	0.76
Subscribe empty callbacks to empty observable via pipe operator	571.48 ns	4.01 ns	5.21 ns	0.77

Sources

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + immediate	1165.64 ns	9.72 ns	10.29 ns	0.94
from array of 1 - create + subscribe + current_thread	1436.10 ns	17.90 ns	19.39 ns	0.92
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) create + subscribe	3716.67 ns	232.18 ns	235.61 ns	0.99
defer from array of 1 - defer + create + subscribe + immediate	1190.46 ns	9.42 ns	9.57 ns	0.98
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + immediate	3693.87 ns	145.55 ns	149.93 ns	0.97
interval - interval + take(3) + subscribe + current_thread	3459.42 ns	65.11 ns	71.19 ns	0.91
from array of 1 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	120312.50 ns	114330.00 ns	125233.33 ns	0.91
from array of 1000 - create + as_blocking + subscribe + new_thread	128933.33 ns	131077.78 ns	152742.86 ns	0.86
concat_as_source of just(1 immediate) and just(1,2 immediate)create + subscribe	5321.83 ns	307.21 ns	306.46 ns	1.00

Filtering Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take(1)+subscribe	1808.80 ns	25.30 ns	24.99 ns	1.01
immediate_just+filter(true)+subscribe	1302.29 ns	24.37 ns	24.05 ns	1.01
immediate_just(1,2)+skip(1)+subscribe	1991.47 ns	24.07 ns	23.45 ns	1.03
immediate_just(1,1,2)+distinct_until_changed()+subscribe	1333.99 ns	29.01 ns	26.23 ns	1.11
immediate_just(1,2)+first()+subscribe	2045.24 ns	22.83 ns	23.74 ns	0.96
immediate_just(1,2)+last()+subscribe	1776.52 ns	24.07 ns	24.67 ns	0.98
immediate_just+take_last(1)+subscribe	1998.57 ns	70.41 ns	70.26 ns	1.00
immediate_just(1,2,3)+element_at(1)+subscribe	1330.09 ns	27.46 ns	26.54 ns	1.03

Schedulers

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate scheduler create worker + schedule	475.07 ns	6.18 ns	6.42 ns	0.96
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule	649.46 ns	13.88 ns	18.11 ns	0.77
current_thread scheduler create worker + schedule + recursive schedule	1087.69 ns	103.26 ns	108.63 ns	0.95

Transforming Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+map(v*2)+subscribe	1304.81 ns	24.37 ns	24.37 ns	1.00
immediate_just+scan(10, std::plus)+subscribe	1444.62 ns	26.56 ns	26.53 ns	1.00
immediate_just+flat_map(immediate_just(v*2))+subscribe	3476.74 ns	266.79 ns	273.06 ns	0.98
immediate_just+buffer(2)+subscribe	2614.83 ns	69.88 ns	69.87 ns	1.00
immediate_just+window(2)+subscribe + subscsribe inner	4042.05 ns	1323.24 ns	1318.21 ns	1.00

Conditional Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+take_while(false)+subscribe	1605.15 ns	23.14 ns	23.12 ns	1.00
immediate_just+take_while(true)+subscribe	1306.20 ns	24.37 ns	24.06 ns	1.01

Utility Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(1)+subscribe_on(immediate)+subscribe	3460.24 ns	11.11 ns	11.11 ns	1.00

Combining Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just(immediate_just(1), immediate_just(1)) + merge() + subscribe	4931.92 ns	306.86 ns	313.84 ns	0.98
immediate_just(1) + merge_with(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	5388.57 ns	264.79 ns	267.19 ns	0.99
immediate_just(1) + with_latest_from(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	-	307.17 ns	337.38 ns	0.91
immediate_just(immediate_just(1),immediate_just(1)) + switch_on_next() + subscribe	5267.86 ns	952.22 ns	934.57 ns	1.02
immediate_just(1) + zip(immediate_just(2)) + subscribe	3564.29 ns	575.93 ns	563.32 ns	1.02

Subjects

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
publish_subject with 1 observer - on_next	37.70 ns	19.98 ns	20.04 ns	1.00
subscribe 100 observers to publish_subject	256350.00 ns	26769.77 ns	28373.81 ns	0.94
100 on_next to 100 observers to publish_subject	54842.11 ns	32648.39 ns	32651.61 ns	1.00

Scenarios

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
basic sample	1890.27 ns	101.85 ns	102.06 ns	1.00
basic sample with immediate scheduler	1918.73 ns	74.21 ns	72.36 ns	1.03

Aggregating Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
immediate_just+reduce(10, std::plus)+subscribe	1446.64 ns	24.99 ns	24.66 ns	1.01

Error Handling Operators

name	rxcpp	rpp	prev rpp	ratio
create(on_next(1), on_error())+on_error_resume_next(immediate_just(2)))+subscribe	2136.42 ns	243.12 ns	248.54 ns	0.98
create(on_error())+retry(1)+subscribe	1462.82 ns	193.95 ns	190.31 ns	1.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.28%. Comparing base (16fe752) to head (d372d79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v2.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v2     #663   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.28%   98.28%           
=======================================
  Files         154      154           
  Lines        7717     7717           
=======================================
  Hits         7585     7585           
  Misses        132      132           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud