feat: Add the last merged table to the public inputs of the hiding circuit by federicobarbacovi · Pull Request #15829 · AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

federicobarbacovi · 2025-07-18T16:09:33Z

We make the merged table received by the Merge verifier in the hiding circuit a public input to the hiding circuit. This is needed because the Merge verifier will soon receive t_commitments, T_prev_commitments as inputs rather than reading them from the proof.

EDIT:

To complete the work on the consistency checks, and to ensure the soundness of the Goblin verification, the merged table received by the Merge verifier in the last step of a Goblin accumulation must be set to be a public input of the circuit that performs the verification, so that the verifier can extract that public input and use it as the commitment to the previous table in the Merge verification.

For example, in ClientIVC the last Merge verification before the final Goblin verification happens in the HidingKernel, so we need to add the merged table commitments received by the Merge verifier inside the HidingKernel to be public inputs of the HidingKernel.

After this PR, MegaVerifier = UltraVerifier<MegaFlavor> always expects the inputs to be PairingInputs + commitments to ECC op tables. These inputs are produced by the class HidingKernelIO (even though in the future we might consider changing this name)

The PR required changes to various tests to accommodate the new structure of the public inputs.

- Removes `circuit_size` from all VKs (only store `log_circuit_size`) - Updates `compute_public_input_delta()` to correctly take witness values and compute `dyadic_size` via `pow()` Addresses most of AztecProtocol/barretenberg#1283 but one instance remains

…verification (#15735) Introduce the classes `SubtableWitnessCommitments` which stores `t_commitments` (and in the future `T_prev_commitments`) and `WitnessCommitments`, which stores `t_commitments`, `T_commitments` (and in the future `T_prev_commitments`). The role of these classes is to facilitate the introduction of consistency checks between two consecutive merges, see [#1351](AztecProtocol/barretenberg#1351). - The value of `t_commitments` is populated by extracting the commitments from the VK of the PG verifier. - (Future work) The value of `T_prev_commitments` is populated by taking the previous value of `T_commitments` - The value of `T_commitments` is populated by the Merge verifier --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <adam.domurad@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <domuradical@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com>

1. Asserts now throw runtime errors in non-debug builds. 1. `BB_ASSERT_*` now throw_or_abort in non-debug builds. 2. Replace `ASSERT` in tests with `ASSERT_TRUE` or other gtest functions. 3. Replace `EXPECT_DEATH` and `ASSERT_DEATH` in tests with `EXPECT_THROW_OR_ABORT` or `ASSERT_THROW_OR_ABORT`. 4. Remove `#ifdef NDEBUG` around the above in tests since they work in non-debug builds now. 5. Asserts in `constexpr`s uses info instead of sstream. Fixes AztecProtocol/barretenberg#1460

As a measure of precaution in case of misconfigured ecc ops in an app circuit that might attempt, for example, to link ecc ops between apps and kernels, the subtable of ecc ops in each kernel circuit will start with an eq and reset op. This cannot happen when the API for creating ecc ops is used properly as the logic in `goblin_element` ensures an eq and reset op is present at the end of each `batch_mul`, function also used for `operator+` and `operator-`. Moreover, the `add_gates_to_ensure_nonzero_polynomials` makes sure that an eq and reset exists if no other ecc ops are encountered in the circuit. --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <adam.domurad@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <domuradical@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sarkoxed <75146596+Sarkoxed@users.noreply.github.com>

commit 2a5f380 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Jul 18 11:25:25 2025 +0000 Fixes commit 62c7260 Merge: f96e42c ae67a84 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Jul 18 11:20:24 2025 +0000 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/merge-train/barretenberg' into fb/native_io_mechanism commit f96e42c Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Jul 18 11:17:55 2025 +0000 Introduce native IO mechanism and update ultra verifier interface commit 9c85f50 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Jul 18 09:43:37 2025 +0000 Changes to function signatures commit 1885708 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 18:00:17 2025 +0200 feat: Implement native reconstruction from public inputs for `AffineElement`, `bb::fq`, and `bb::fr` (#15774) We make public input reconstruction in native land more idiomatic by introducing `reconstruct_from_public` method for `fq`, `fr`, and `affine_element`. --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <adam.domurad@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <domuradical@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Sarkoxed <75146596+Sarkoxed@users.noreply.github.com> commit d218481 Merge: 5380e55 afc8002 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 15:14:28 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 5380e55 Merge: 9ac2ef8 4023da4 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 14:53:32 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 9ac2ef8 Merge: 8b71509 710c791 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 11:48:55 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 8b71509 Merge: 7ea4056 4aeb094 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 09:01:52 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 7ea4056 Merge: ad3dea5 980391a Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 17 06:19:25 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit ad3dea5 Merge: 8456fac 0ab34ee Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 22:51:35 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 8456fac Merge: de7c071 445db95 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 22:26:26 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit de7c071 Merge: 0968cf0 9bbff1b Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 22:04:07 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 0968cf0 Merge: 921cd03 69bcc53 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 21:57:40 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 921cd03 Merge: 29c5a1f 03138c4 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 18:45:54 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 29c5a1f Merge: 6cd32ca 6205381 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 17:59:18 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 6cd32ca Merge: 6893736 1891f8d Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 16:55:29 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 6893736 Merge: 9f27abb 5988a35 Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 16:44:00 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit 9f27abb Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Wed Jul 16 16:21:05 2025 +0000 [empty] Start merge-train. Choo choo.

federicobarbacovi · 2025-07-18T16:09:56Z

Removed as I imagine it was added by mistake

federicobarbacovi · 2025-07-18T16:10:36Z

-                val += 1;
-                break;
-            }
+        // Tamper with the commitment in the proof


Modified so that it is always a correct tampering. Adding 1 messes up entries in the proof that correspond to point on the curve

We introduce native counterparts for our IO mechanism so that the reconstruction of public inputs in from native field elements is similar to that in-circuit --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <adam.domurad@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <domuradical@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Sarkoxed <75146596+Sarkoxed@users.noreply.github.com>

…b/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs

@LeilaWang

commit 3dbca03 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 13:24:16 2025 +0000 Typos commit 6a8a523 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 13:11:25 2025 +0000 Fixes commit b9e62d6 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 12:15:59 2025 +0000 Update remaining files commit 37088cd Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 11:47:45 2025 +0000 Update Goblin boomerang test commit 39ac8c2 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 11:46:02 2025 +0000 Update goblin commit 888fc82 Author: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 11:26:40 2025 +0000 Update merge verifier api commit 4fb769b Merge: eaf251e f70e99d Author: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 09:38:03 2025 +0000 Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg commit f70e99d Author: Nicolás Venturo <nicolas.venturo@gmail.com> Date: Thu Jul 24 05:55:55 2025 -0300 docs: updated code docs (#15701) With `Empty` being a supertrait of `Eq`, `Empty + Eq` becomes meaningless - this was emitting warnings. @LeilaWang what do you think about setting up a CI job that checks the protocol circuit crates emit no warnings? That's what we use in aztec-nr and it's been working wonderfully. tldr you need to run `nargo check --deny-warnings`.

federicobarbacovi · 2025-07-24T16:52:30Z

        // Check the size of the recursive verifier
        if constexpr (std::same_as<RecursiveFlavor, MegaZKRecursiveFlavor_<UltraCircuitBuilder>>) {
-            uint32_t NUM_GATES_EXPECTED = 873673;
+            uint32_t NUM_GATES_EXPECTED = 874803;


Bump in size is due to the new public inputs. There are 32 new public inputs (4 commitments, which amount to 4 * 2 elements in bigfield, each of which accounts for 4 public inputs), they account for the raise in gates as follows:

(32 // 3 + 1) * 76 = 836 new gates due to hashing to generate the first challenge in Oink

192 new gates to compute public_input_delta (32 * 2 new additions)

Finalisation (there are more range lists)

…ments as input and returns the commitment to the merged table (#15949) We modify the `MergeVerifier` so that it gets the subtable commitments as input and returns the commitment to the merged table. The reason for this change is that given the new structure of `ClientIVC` following [#15704](#15704), we can't access the merged table commitments from inside `complete_hiding_circuit_logic`. This PR is in preparation for [#15829](#15829) --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com>

…b/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs

federicobarbacovi · 2025-07-25T11:48:05Z

 HonkRecursionConstraintOutput<typename Flavor::CircuitBuilder> create_honk_recursion_constraints(
    typename Flavor::CircuitBuilder& builder, const RecursionConstraint& input, bool has_valid_witness_assignments)
-    requires IsRecursiveFlavor<Flavor>
+    requires(IsRecursiveFlavor<Flavor> && IsUltraHonk<typename Flavor::NativeFlavor>)


Added because this function is used only when IsUltraHonk is true. It avoids confusion now that the public inputs for MegaFlavor are different

…y circuit

iakovenkos · 2025-07-25T14:11:34Z

+        builder->finalize_public_inputs();
+    }
+
+    static std::array<G1, Builder::NUM_WIRES> empty_ecc_op_tables(Builder& builder)


can delete now, right?

We could, but in some places we will need to instantiate ecc op tables to the points at infinity as the starting point of the Goblin recursion. More precisely, we'll need to do it in the init Kernel, and in the Goblin AVM verifier. I thought it was nicer to have a method that produces such tables rather than having a loop every time

iakovenkos

Looks great, thanks for avoiding points at infinity in the default ecc tables!

See [merge-train-readme.md](https://github.com/AztecProtocol/aztec-packages/blob/next/.github/workflows/merge-train-readme.md). BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE chore: remove `logic` operations from `uint` (#15975) chore: Modify the `MergeVerifier` so that it gets the subtable commitments as input and returns the commitment to the merged table (#15949) fix: delete tar generated by test-vk-havent-changed script (#15988) chore: replace q_arith with q_3 in memory relation (#15953) chore: simplify `uint` logic by removing `witness_status` (#15976) Revert "chore: remove `logic` operations from `uint`" (#15997) Revert "chore: simplify `uint` logic by removing `witness_status`" (#16000) feat: Add the last merged table to the public inputs of the hiding circuit (#15829) chore: combined `uint` audit (#16030) chore: delete and ignore barretenberg/src/honk/keys/ (#16042) fix: Fix tube proof construction (#16052) feat: Link successive recursive Merge verifications (#16032) chore: Package inputs to Merge verifier into a single struct (#16075) END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE --------- Co-authored-by: AztecBot <tech@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Suyash Bagad <suyash@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: federicobarbacovi <171914500+federicobarbacovi@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Hao <jonathan@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sergei iakovenko <105737703+iakovenkos@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <adam.domurad@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Raju Krishnamoorthy <krishnamoorthy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: notnotraju <raju@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Xia <lucasxia01@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Khashayar Barooti <khashayar@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Jean M <132435771+jeanmon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Gherghisan <alexghr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <spalladino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Santiago Palladino <santiago@aztec-labs.com> Co-authored-by: ludamad <domuradical@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: maramihali <mara@aztecprotocol.com> Co-authored-by: Sarkoxed <75146596+Sarkoxed@users.noreply.github.com>

AztecBot and others added 20 commits July 17, 2025 20:46

[empty] Start merge-train. Choo choo.

f1176b4

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

0aa2254

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

49c15da

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

a1a4706

Introduce hiding kernel io class

702f858

Update hiding kernel io to contain array of commitments

5658bbd

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

e4452b9

Update civc

80741b1

Update ClientIVC recursive verifier

d179fa2

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

fdc378e

Fix test

1609816

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

86afd02

Remove flavor

7c22a9d

Fix

db5f547

Delete bb-civc-inputs-tar.gz

2636a3f

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread barretenberg/cpp/bb-civc-inputs.tar.gz

federicobarbacovi Jul 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed as I imagine it was added by mistake

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

AztecBot and others added 8 commits July 18, 2025 16:13

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

09ae049

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

774dc8a

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

21af6a7

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

13fef33

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

617644a

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

db567de

Merge branch 'next' into merge-train/barretenberg

d5e9cb3

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/merge-train/barretenberg' into f…

a1e5c1f

…b/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs

federicobarbacovi mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2025

chore: Modify the MergeVerifier so that it gets the subtable commitments as input and returns the commitment to the merged table #15949

Merged

federicobarbacovi added 5 commits July 24, 2025 13:54

Update CIVC

4dd7d0b

Introduce default method for ecc op tables

fb57179

Reset Cargo lock

89f47e5

Fixes

099da55

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

federicobarbacovi added 2 commits July 24, 2025 16:54

Use IO mechanism for clearer handling of public inputs propagation

31a4b19

Fix

6d8f16a

Base automatically changed from merge-train/barretenberg to next July 24, 2025 18:20

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/merge-train/barretenberg' into f…

c5401db

…b/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs

federicobarbacovi changed the base branch from next to merge-train/barretenberg July 25, 2025 10:17

federicobarbacovi added 3 commits July 25, 2025 10:43

Minore chores

08e57a4

Fix

6379c53

Fix

8445537

federicobarbacovi marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2025 11:34

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

Reset circuits

987cb42

federicobarbacovi requested a review from iakovenkos July 25, 2025 12:15

federicobarbacovi self-assigned this Jul 25, 2025

Default value of ecc ops reflect those obtained by finalizing an empt…

5ff53f3

…y circuit

iakovenkos reviewed Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

iakovenkos approved these changes Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

federicobarbacovi merged commit fd26dff into merge-train/barretenberg Jul 25, 2025
4 checks passed

federicobarbacovi deleted the fb/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs branch July 25, 2025 15:15

AztecBot mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2025

feat: merge-train/barretenberg #15978

Merged

federicobarbacovi mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2025

chore: Introduce GoblinAvmIO and add templated version of verify_proof to UltraRecursiveVerifier #16218

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: Add the last merged table to the public inputs of the hiding circuit#15829

feat: Add the last merged table to the public inputs of the hiding circuit#15829
federicobarbacovi merged 79 commits into
merge-train/barretenbergfrom
fb/add_merge_table_to_hiding_circuit_pub_inputs

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 18, 2025

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 18, 2025

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 24, 2025

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

iakovenkos Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

iakovenkos left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Conversation

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

iakovenkos Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

federicobarbacovi Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

iakovenkos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

federicobarbacovi commented Jul 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading