Skip to content

chore: babysit merge-train/fairies-v5 CI (public_authwit_transfer failure)#23903

Closed
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit into
merge-train/fairies-v5from
cb/babysit-fairies-v5
Closed

chore: babysit merge-train/fairies-v5 CI (public_authwit_transfer failure)#23903
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit into
merge-train/fairies-v5from
cb/babysit-fairies-v5

Conversation

@AztecBot

@AztecBot AztecBot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Babysit/iteration PR for the merge-train/fairies-v5 CI failure (re: #23881).

Failing test

cli-wallet/test/flows/public_authwit_transfer.sh — the only failing test on #23881; rest of CI is green.

Root cause (so far)

During aztec-wallet send transfer_in_public -f operator, the operator account's entrypoint reads its own signing key:

storage.signing_public_key.get_note()   (schnorr_account_contract/src/main.nr:70)
 → view_note / get_note                  (single_private_immutable.nr:136, note_getter.nr:113/286)
 → Assertion failed: Failed to get a note

i.e. the operator account's signing_public_key (a PrivateImmutable, written at deploy-account and discovered via tagging with the account's own address) is not present in the operator PXE's note DB at simulation time.

Bisection

This points to a note-sync timing issue (fresh-account own-note race), possibly exposed by the #23827 mempool/sequencer changes, rather than a logic bug in the #23785 NoteStore refactor.

This PR

Empty re-trigger commit to get a clean CI signal on the same merged content and confirm whether the failure is flaky or deterministic, and to provide a branch to land a fix on. No source changes yet.


Created by claudebox · group: slackbot

Empty commit to re-run CI and determine whether the public_authwit_transfer
e2e failure (operator account signing_public_key note not found during
entrypoint) is a flaky note-sync race or a deterministic regression.
@AztecBot AztecBot added ci-draft Run CI on draft PRs. claudebox Owned by claudebox. it can push to this PR. labels Jun 5, 2026
@nchamo nchamo closed this Jun 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-draft Run CI on draft PRs. claudebox Owned by claudebox. it can push to this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants