Skip to content

docs: close ledger #009 #010 #032 #041 #063#1175

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/ledger-009-010-032-041-063-519b
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

docs: close ledger #009 #010 #032 #041 #063#1175
cursor[bot] merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/ledger-009-010-032-041-063-519b

Conversation

@BigSimmo

@BigSimmo BigSimmo commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Closes outstanding-issues ledger items with docs/decision records only (no application or RAG behavior changes):

Also fixes CI/PR hygiene found on review:

  • Prettier formatting on touched docs (Static PR checks failure).
  • Removes leftover PR_POLICY_BODY.md from merged docs: search performance review ledger (cross-mode) #1134 that had overwritten this PR description with unrelated search-performance text (this file is the temporary sync template for the correct body).

RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change — docs/guardrail reinforcement and product briefs only; no edits under src/lib/rag/**, clinical-search, ranking, or eval fixtures.

Verification

  • npm run verify:cheap (passed on tip 95d68c6b; 3318 tests)
  • npx prettier --check on touched docs after format fix
  • npm run check:branch-review-ledger
  • UI verification not run: docs-only; no UI/routing/styling product changes
  • Provider/eval gates not run: no retrieval/ranking/answer behavior change

Risk and rollout

  • Risk: Low — documentation, ledger archive, and PR-body template hygiene
  • Rollback: Revert the docs commits
  • Provider or production effects: None

Notes

Recommended queue order gap closed after removing #063. Gated brief follow-ups (wire coming-soon features, Current Clinical Work storage/UI, second Factsheets mode, governance ranking) are intentionally not implemented.

Record ops-only /api/jobs decision, coming-soon audit, governance
ranking REFUTED guardrail, Factsheets reading-model brief, and Current
Clinical Work privacy/persistence brief. Archive the five open items;
no RAG or application behavior changes.

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@BigSimmo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 10 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 78008b90-db1f-40af-9861-937cca22b4ff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de1a82b and 7c58302.

📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • PR_POLICY_BODY.md
  • docs/api-jobs-ops-surface.md
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md
  • docs/codebase-index.md
  • docs/current-clinical-work-brief.md
  • docs/factsheets-reading-model-brief.md
  • docs/outstanding-issues.md
  • docs/rag-behaviour/README.md
  • docs/rag-behaviour/refuted-approaches.md
  • docs/rag-behaviour/safeguards.md
  • docs/site-map.md
  • docs/wiring-conventions.md
  • scripts/generate-site-map.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cursor/ledger-009-010-032-041-063-519b

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@supabase

supabase Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI triage

CI failed on this PR. Automated classification of the 2 failed job(s):

  • Static PR checksneeds investigation: inspect the failing step and uploaded diagnostics; rerun only after classifying the cause.
  • PR requiredneeds investigation: inspect the failing step and uploaded diagnostics; rerun only after classifying the cause.

Compared with main CI run #5327 (success).

Classification is evidence routing, not permission to ignore a failure. Exact quarantined Playwright identities remain governed by the flake ledger.

cursoragent and others added 8 commits July 24, 2026 17:36
…-032-041-063-519b

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Static PR checks failed on Prettier for five docs files. Also remove
leftover PR_POLICY_BODY.md from merged #1134 so Sync PR policy body
stops overwriting this docs PR description.

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Temporary template so CI Sync PR policy body replaces the polluted
search-performance description left from merged #1134.

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Keep the corrected PR #1175 description without leaving the sync
template on the branch for merge to main.

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
…-032-041-063-519b

Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursor
cursor Bot marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 19:15
@cursor
cursor Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) July 24, 2026 19:17
cursoragent and others added 3 commits July 24, 2026 19:23
Resolve docs/outstanding-issues.md by keeping main's ledger and re-applying closures for #9 #10 #32 #41 #63 into Resolved/archive.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@cursor
cursor Bot merged commit 87b6b43 into main Jul 25, 2026
18 checks passed
@cursor
cursor Bot deleted the cursor/ledger-009-010-032-041-063-519b branch July 25, 2026 05:26
cursor Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2026
#1175 deleted the #1134 leftover, then #1153 reintroduced a sync
template. Leaving it on main lets Sync PR policy body overwrite
unrelated PR descriptions. Remove it again after descriptions are set.

Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: BigSimmo <BigSimmo@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants