Skip to content

fix(audit): supersede #1186 with safe main-based remediation#1209

Merged
BigSimmo merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/pr1186-audit-remediation-c94c
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

fix(audit): supersede #1186 with safe main-based remediation#1209
BigSimmo merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/pr1186-audit-remediation-c94c

Conversation

@BigSimmo

@BigSimmo BigSimmo commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Supersedes conflicted PR #1186 (closed without merging). That PR was based on a dirty reconciliation checkpoint (faa50e6e3), carried unresolved conflict markers, and could not merge. This branch ports only the intentional 16-file audit commit onto current main, with the P0/P1 defects fixed.

  • Library health CLS skeletons / intrinsic size
  • Eval harness bounded concurrency (latency mode stays serial)
  • Async heavy-run lock heartbeats, force/stale reclaim
  • Dry-run branch:cleanup with argv-safe deletes
  • skill:create with correct interface: openai.yaml shape

RAG impact: no retrieval behaviour change - eval harness concurrency and operator tooling only; ranking/imputation/comparator formulas unchanged.

Verification

  • Focused Vitest: tests/audit-remediation-tooling.test.ts + force-lock/dead-owner cases
  • npm run check:skills (33 canonical skills)
  • Prettier on touched files
  • Merged latest origin/main (clean; PR MERGEABLE)
  • Verification not run: full npm run verify:cheap / verify:pr-local deferred to hosted CI on exact head
  • UI verification not run: small Library health skeleton CLS change; covered by hosted Production UI

Risk and rollout

  • Risk: medium; touches eval harness concurrency and heavy-run lock reclaim paths, plus a small Documents library-health UI loading state.
  • Rollback: revert this PR tip. Do not reopen Implement Audit Recommendations #1186 as the rollback path.

Explicitly not ported from #1186

  • Conflicted checkpoint tree / merge markers
  • Placeholder skills that would break the 33-skill catalog
  • Accidental deletion of composite-action discovery in check-github-action-pins.mjs

BigSimmo added 2 commits July 25, 2026 22:41
Supersede conflicted PR #1186 by landing only the intentional audit fixes:
library-health skeleton/CLS, eval concurrency without duplicate bindings,
async heavy-run lock heartbeats with force/stale reclaim, dry-run branch
cleanup, and skill-create scaffolding with the interface openai.yaml shape.
@supabase

supabase Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@BigSimmo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 23 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9d8d9705-72ad-4651-b092-d88024144541

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb443df and 61f6df8.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • docs/branch-review-ledger.md
  • package.json
  • scripts/eval-retrieval.ts
  • scripts/run-heavy.mjs
  • scripts/skill-create.mjs
  • scripts/sweep-merged-branches.mjs
  • scripts/test-run-lock.mjs
  • src/components/clinical-dashboard/DocumentManagerPanel.tsx
  • tests/audit-remediation-tooling.test.ts
  • tests/test-runner-safety.test.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch cursor/pr1186-audit-remediation-c94c

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@BigSimmo
BigSimmo marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2026 14:56
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@BigSimmo
BigSimmo merged commit e98376c into main Jul 25, 2026
19 checks passed
@BigSimmo
BigSimmo deleted the cursor/pr1186-audit-remediation-c94c branch July 25, 2026 15:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant