fix(therapy): remove search-page intro and local query field

[BigSimmo]

Summary

Removes the redundant Therapy search intro on /therapy-compass/search across all breakpoints:

• Drop the Therapy heading and “Find source-grounded…” blurb
• Drop the local in-page Search therapies input (library filtering still works via home/?q= deep links, topic/availability filters, and chips)
• Promote SearchResultsHeaderBand to the page h1 so the route keeps a primary heading

Clinical governance preflight

• Not applicable: UI-only Therapy search chrome change; no ingestion, answer generation, ranking, source rendering, document access, privacy, or clinical output changes.

Test plan

• npm run test:focused -- --files tests/therapy-compass-mode-wiring.test.ts
• Focused Playwright: therapy a11y + route coverage (or npm run verify:ui if runtime available)
• Manual: /therapy-compass/search on phone + desktop — no intro/local input; ribbon + filters remain

Notes

Shell search chrome is unchanged. On-page typing against the therapy library is intentionally removed with this intro block; typed queries from the Therapy home still land via ?q=&run=1.

  

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Updates
  • Refined the Therapy Compass search results header to provide a clearer results ribbon with proper heading semantics.
  • Removed redundant search-page title, description, and search-input layout elements.
  • Updated search results behavior to display the selected topic as the primary heading.
  • Improved accessibility checks for focus visibility and heading structure.
  • Updated responsive and route coverage for search result navigation.

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@BigSimmo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 57 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0a17a91a-9b20-4850-a633-72b1e3985120

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59bf6d6 and b80a381.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/therapy-compass-mode-wiring.test.ts

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Therapy Compass now renders the search results heading through SearchResultsHeaderBand at level 1, removes the standalone search header and related CSS, and updates wiring, accessibility, and route tests for the revised UI.

Changes

Therapy search results header

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Search results header composition src/components/therapy-compass/screens/search-screen.tsx, src/components/therapy-compass/therapy-compass.css	SearchResultsHeaderBand now receives headingLevel={1}, while the standalone search header, input block, unused icon import, and obsolete CSS rules are removed.
Search header validation tests/therapy-compass-mode-wiring.test.ts, tests/ui-accessibility.spec.ts, tests/ui-route-coverage.spec.ts	Tests now validate the search results ribbon, absence of the search textbox, topic-filter focus styling, and the selected therapy heading.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• BigSimmo/Database#646: Introduces the Therapy Compass search screen mockup updated by this change.
• BigSimmo/Database#650: Refactors the search screen around the search-results ribbon used here.
• BigSimmo/Database#1184: Moves search-screen controls into the SearchResultsHeaderBand integration.

Suggested labels: codex

Suggested reviewers: claude, cursoragent

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately describes the main UI change on the therapy search page.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers summary, testing, clinical preflight, and notes, but it does not follow the template’s Verification format exactly.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch cursor/therapy-search-trim-e63e

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 59bf6d6532

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[BigSimmo]

@codex resolve actionable Codex review findings for this pull request and current head using the repository instructions. This is the pull request's single automatic repair pass: do not perform a fresh review, create new standalone findings, or request another review. Work only the existing unresolved Codex threads on the current head. Always fix P0 and P1 findings. For P2 and lower findings, fix only clear, scoped, low-risk issues; otherwise disposition them with a concise reason. After fixing or dispositioning a thread, reply in that thread with as the first line, followed by a concise summary; that marker authorizes the workflow to close that exact thread. If human input or new authorization is required, do not use the marker and leave the thread open with the blocker. Finish only after every actionable thread is fixed or dispositioned and closed, or explicitly left open for a human decision. Do not update the branch from main, address unrelated reviews, broaden scope, or create more than one scoped fix commit. Do not use external APIs, paid services, credentials, dependency changes, or broad refactors unless explicitly authorized. Add targeted tests where behavior changes and run the narrowest relevant validation.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: b80a381081

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".